Michael Schmidt

Michael Schmidt


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 July 2022 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RNRanda Natras
Randa Natras
Benedikt SojaBenedikt Soja
Benedikt Soja
Michael SchmidtMichael Schmidt
Michael Schmidt
Space weather describes varying conditions between the Sun and Earth that can degrade Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) operations. Thus, these effects should be precisely and timely corrected for accurate and reliable GNSS applications. That can be modeled with the Vertical Total Electron Content (VTEC) in the Earth’s ionosphere. This study investigates different learning algorithms to approximate nonlinear space weather processes and forecast VTEC for 1 h and 24 h in the future for low-, mid- and high-latitude ionospheric grid points along the same longitude. VTEC models are developed using learning algorithms of Decision Tree and ensemble learning of Random Forest, Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost). Furthermore, ensemble models are combined into a single meta-model Voting Regressor. Models were trained, optimized, and validated with the time series cross-validation technique. Moreover, the relative importance of input variables to the VTEC forecast is estimated. The results show that the developed models perform well in both quiet and storm conditions, where multi-tree ensemble learning outperforms the single Decision Tree. In particular, the meta-estimator Voting Regressor provides mostly the lowest RMSE and the highest correlation coefficients as it averages predictions from different well-performing models. Furthermore, expanding the input dataset with time derivatives, moving averages, and daily differences, as well as modifying data, such as differencing, enhances the learning of space weather features, especially over a longer forecast horizon.

22 December 2020 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Andreas GossAndreas Goss
Andreas Goss
MPManuel Hernandez Pajares
Manuel Hernandez Pajares
Michael SchmidtMichael Schmidt
Michael Schmidt
David Roma-DollaseDavid Roma-Dollase
David Roma-Dollase
EEEren Erdogan
Eren Erdogan
FSFlorian Seitz
Florian Seitz
The ionosphere is one of the main error sources in positioning and navigation; thus, information about the ionosphere is mandatory for precise modern Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) applications. The International GNSS Service (IGS) and its Ionosphere Associated Analysis Centers (IAAC) routinely provide ionospheric information in terms of global ionosphere maps (final GIM). Typically, these products are modeled using series expansion in terms of spherical harmonics (SHs) with a maximum degree of n=15 and are based on post processed observations from Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS), as well as final satellite orbits. However, precise applications such as autonomous driving or precision agriculture require real-time (RT) information about the ionospheric electron content with high spectral and spatial resolution. Ionospheric RT-GIMs are disseminated via Ntrip protocol using the SSR VTEC message of the RTCM. This message can be streamed in RT, but it is limited for the dissemination of coefficients of SHs of lower degrees only. It allows the dissemination of SH coefficients up to a degree of n=16. This suits to most the SH models of the IAACs, but higher spectral degrees or models in terms of B-spline basis functions, voxels, splines and many more cannot be considered. In addition to the SHs, several alternative approaches, e.g., B-splines or Voxels, have proven to be appropriate basis functions for modeling the ionosphere with an enhanced resolution. Providing them using the SSR VTEC message requires a transfer to SHs. In this context, the following questions are discussed based on data of a B-spline model with high spectral resolution; (1) How can the B-spline model be transformed to SHs in order to fit to the RTCM requirements and (2) what is the loss of detail when the B-spline model is converted to SHs of degree of n=16? Furthermore, we discuss (3) what is the maximum necessary SH degree n to convert the given B-spline model and (4) how can the transformation be performed to make it applicable for real-time applications? For a final assessment, we perform both, the dSTEC analysis and a single-frequency positioning in kinematic mode, using the transformed GIMs for correcting the ionospheric delay. The assessment shows that the converted GIMs with degrees n≥30 coincide with the original B-spline model and improve the positioning accuracy significantly.

4 June 2020 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EEEren Erdogan
Eren Erdogan
Michael SchmidtMichael Schmidt
Michael Schmidt
Andreas GossAndreas Goss
Andreas Goss
BGBarbara Görres
Barbara Görres
FSFlorian Seitz
Florian Seitz
The Kalman filter (KF) is widely applied in (ultra) rapid and (near) real-time ionosphere modeling to meet the demand on ionosphere products required in many applications extending from navigation and positioning to monitoring space weather events and naturals disasters. The requirement of a prior definition of the stochastic models attached to the measurements and the dynamic models of the KF is a drawback associated with its standard implementation since model uncertainties can exhibit temporal variations or the time span of a given test data set would not be large enough. Adaptive methods can mitigate these problems by tuning the stochastic model parameters during the filter run-time. Accordingly, one of the primary objectives of our study is to apply an adaptive KF based on variance component estimation to compute the global Vertical Total Electron Content (VTEC) of the ionosphere by assimilating different ionospheric GNSS measurements. Secondly, the derived VTEC representation is based on a series expansion in terms of compactly supported B-spline functions. We highlight the morphological similarity of the spatial distributions and the magnitudes between VTEC values and the corresponding estimated B-spline coefficients. This similarity allows for deducing physical interpretations from the coefficients. In this context, an empirical adaptive model to account for the dynamic model uncertainties, representing the temporal variations of VTEC errors, is developed in this work according to the structure of B-spline coefficients. For the validation, the differential slant total electron content (dSTEC) analysis and a comparison with Jason-2/3 altimetry data are performed. Assessments show that the quality of the VTEC products derived by the presented algorithm is in good agreement, or even more accurate, with the products provided by IGS ionosphere analysis centers within the selected periods in 2015 and 2017. Furthermore, we show that the presented approach can be applied to different ionosphere conditions ranging from very high to low solar activity without concerning time-variable model uncertainties, including measurement error and process noise of the KF because the associated covariance matrices are computed in a self-adaptive manner during run-time.

8 April 2020 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Andreas GossAndreas Goss
Andreas Goss
Michael SchmidtMichael Schmidt
Michael Schmidt
EEEren Erdogan
Eren Erdogan
FSFlorian Seitz
Florian Seitz
The ionosphere is one of the largest error sources in GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite Systems) applications and can cause up to several meters of error in positioning. Especially for single-frequency users, who cannot correct the ionospheric delay, the information about the state of the ionosphere is mandatory. Dual- and multi-frequency GNSS users, on the other hand, can correct the ionospheric effect on their observations by linear combination. However, real-time applications such as autonomous driving or precision farming, require external high accuracy corrections for fast convergence. Mostly, this external information is given in terms of grids or coefficients of the vertical total electron content (VTEC). Globally distributed GNSS stations of different networks, such as the network of the International GNSS Services (IGS), provide a large number of multi-frequency observations which can be used to determine the state of the ionosphere. These data are used to generate Global Ionosphere Maps (GIM). Due to the inhomogeneous global distribution of GNSS real-time stations and especially due to the large data gaps over oceanic areas, the global VTEC models are usually limited in their spatial and spectral resolution. Most of the GIMs are mathematically based on globally defined radial basis functions, i.e., spherical harmonics (SH), with a maximum degree of 15 and provided with a spatial resolution of 2.5 ° × 5 ° in latitude and longitude, respectively. Regional GNSS networks, however, offer dense clusters of observations, which can be used to generate regional VTEC solutions with a higher spectral resolution. In this study, we introduce a two-step model (TSM) comprising a global model as the first step and a regional model as the second step. We apply polynomial and trigonometric B-spline functions to represent the global VTEC. Polynomial B-splines are used for modelling the finer structures of VTEC within selected regions, i.e., the densification areas. The TSM provides both, a global and a regional VTEC map at the same time. In order to study the performance, we apply the developed approach to hourly data of the global IGS network as well as the EUREF network of the European region for St. Patrick storm in March 2015. For the assessment of the generated maps, we use the dSTEC analysis and compare both maps with different global and regional products from the IGS Ionosphere Associated Analysis Centers, e.g., the global product from CODE (Berne, Switzerland) and from UPC (Barcelona, Spain), as well as the regional maps from ROB (Brussels, Belgium). The assessment shows a significant improvement of the regional VTEC representation in the form of the generated TSM maps. Among all other products used for comparison, the developed regional one is of the highest accuracy within the selected time span. Since the numerical tests are performed using hourly data with a latency of one to two hours, the presented procedure is seen as an intermediate step for the generation of high precision regional real-time corrections for modern applications.

1 July 2021 in IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PCPeng Chen
Peng Chen
Hang LiuHang Liu
Hang Liu
Michael SchmidtMichael Schmidt
Michael Schmidt
YYYibin Yao
Yibin Yao
WYWanqiang Yao
Wanqiang Yao
Aiming at the urgent demands on (near) real-time ionosphere products, we study the near real-time (NRT) modeling of the global ionospheric total electron content (TEC) by IGS hourly data and introduce the Kalman filter (KF) to solve the model parameters. The main objective of this article is to propose an adaptive method for determining the KF process noise covariance matrix. This method can reflect the change regularity of spherical harmonic (SH) between epochs and consider the impact of the current ionosphere level on SH. It can adaptively adjust the KF process noise covariance matrix of each epoch to improve the accuracy of NRT global ionosphere maps (GIMs). We analyze the effects of different initial values of the state vector and its covariance matrix on the SH coefficients and propose a method to avoid repeated filter initialization. The results show that for different initial values, the filter can reach the state of convergence within 6 h, but a high-precision initial value can significantly accelerate the KF convergence speed. Compared with Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) differential slant TEC (dSTEC) observables, the rms of our NRT products xrtg during quiet and magnetic storms are 1.47 and 1.56 TECU, respectively, larger than the postprocessed GIMs, but significantly smaller than those of real-time GIMs. Compared with Jason VTEC, the results also show that the accuracy of xrtg is even better than European Space Agency (ESA) final products during the magnetic storm.

19 May 2020 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
QLQing Liu
Qing Liu
Michael SchmidtMichael Schmidt
Michael Schmidt
Roland PailRoland Pail
Roland Pail
MWMartin Willberg
Martin Willberg
Various types of heterogeneous observations can be combined within a parameter estimation process using spherical radial basis functions (SRBFs) for regional gravity field refinement. In this process, regularization is in most cases inevitable, and choosing an appropriate value for the regularization parameter is a crucial issue. This study discusses the drawbacks of two frequently used methods for choosing the regularization parameter, which are the L-curve method and the variance component estimation (VCE). To overcome their drawbacks, two approaches for the regularization parameter determination are proposed, which combine the L-curve method and VCE. The first approach, denoted as “VCE-Lc”, starts with the calculation of the relative weights between the observation techniques by means of VCE. Based on these weights, the L-curve method is applied to determine the regularization parameter. In the second approach, called “Lc-VCE”, the L-curve method determines first the regularization parameter, and it is set to be fixed during the calculation of the relative weights between the observation techniques from VCE. To evaluate and compare the performance of the two proposed methods with the L-curve method and VCE, all these four methods are applied in six study cases using four types of simulated observations in Europe, and their modeling results are compared with the validation data. The RMS errors (w.r.t the validation data) obtained by VCE-Lc and Lc-VCE are smaller than those obtained from the L-curve method and VCE in all the six cases. VCE-Lc performs the best among these four tested methods, no matter if using SRBFs with smoothing or non-smoothing features. These results prove the benefits of the two proposed methods for regularization parameter determination when different data sets are to be combined.