Francesco M. Chelli

Prof. Francesco M. Chelli

Department of Economics and Social Sciences, School of Economics "Giorgio Fuà", Marche Polytechnic University, Piazzale Martelli, 8, I-60121 Ancona, Italy

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

35Years (1992-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2018 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LSLuca Salvati
Luca Salvati
Ilaria ZambonIlaria Zambon
Ilaria Zambon
Francesco M. ChelliFrancesco M. Chelli
Francesco M. Chelli
PSPere Serra
Pere Serra

26 September 2008 in Economic Systems Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ABAndrea Bonfiglio
Andrea Bonfiglio
Francesco M. ChelliFrancesco M. Chelli
Francesco M. Chelli
The paper aims to analyse the behaviour of a battery of non-survey techniques of constructing regional I-O tables in estimating impact. For this aim, a Monte Carlo simulation, based on the generation of ‘true’ multiregional I-O tables, was carried out. By aggregating multi-regional I-O tables, national I-O tables were obtained. From the latter, indirect regional tables were derived through the application of various regionalisation methods and the relevant multipliers were compared with the ‘true’ multipliers using a set of statistics. Three aspects of the behaviour of the methods have been analysed: performances to reproduce ‘true’ multipliers, variability of simulation error and direction of bias. The results have demonstrated that the Flegg et al. Location Quotient (FLQ) and its augmented version (AFLQ) represent an effective improvement of conventional techniques based on the use of location quotients in both reproducing ‘true’ multipliers and generating more stable simulation errors. In addition, the results have confirmed the existence of a tendency of the methods to over/underestimate impact. In the cases of the FLQ and the AFLQ, this tendency depends on the value of the parameter δ.

1 February 2019 in Land Use Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LSLuca Salvati
Luca Salvati
MCMaria Teresa Ciommi
Maria Teresa Ciommi
Pere SerraPere Serra
Pere Serra
Francesco M. ChelliFrancesco M. Chelli
Francesco M. Chelli

5 August 2018 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Mariateresa CiommiMariateresa Ciommi
Mariateresa Ciommi
Francesco M. ChelliFrancesco M. Chelli
Francesco M. Chelli
MCMargherita Carlucci
Margherita Carlucci
Luca SalvatiLuca Salvati
Luca Salvati
Metropolitan growth in Europe has resulted in drastic changes of urban forms, socio-spatial structures and land-use patterns due to sequential processes of urbanization, suburbanization and re-urbanization. To assess latent shifts from mono-centric models towards more disarticulated and decentralized settlement configurations, the present study evaluates spatio-temporal patterns of growth between the 1920s and the 2010s in three Mediterranean cities with different structure and functions (Barcelona: compact and moderately polycentric; Rome: dispersed, medium-density; Athens: mono-centric, hyper-compact). To identify and characterize long-term urban transformations, an original approach was illustrated in this study, based on a multivariate analysis of 13 indicators resulting from descriptive statistics and linear regression modeling the relationship between population density and distance from inner cities. The empirical results of this study indicate that Barcelona, Rome and Athens have experienced different urbanization cycles, characterized by a (more or less) concentrated distribution of population along urban gradients. Despite similarities in demographic dynamics and planning practices, these processes have determined (i) a mostly centralized growth in Barcelona, (ii) a relatively dispersed and discontinuous spatial structure in Rome, and (iii) a steep decline of population density with the distance from downtown Athens. Compact urban expansion, population decline and urban de-concentration were finally assessed using the analytical approach proposed in this study.

1 May 2017 in Ecological Indicators
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Mariateresa CiommiMariateresa Ciommi
Mariateresa Ciommi
CGChiara Gigliarano
Chiara Gigliarano
AEAlessandra Emili
Alessandra Emili
STStefania Taralli
Stefania Taralli
Francesco M. ChelliFrancesco M. Chelli
Francesco M. Chelli

5 June 2019 in Spatial Economic Analysis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GLGiuseppe Ricciardo Lamonica
Giuseppe Ricciardo Lamonica
MRMaria Cristina Recchioni
Maria Cristina Recchioni
Francesco M. ChelliFrancesco M. Chelli
Francesco M. Chelli
Luca SalvatiLuca Salvati
Luca Salvati
Updating or estimating regional input–output tables is a challenging task addressed with non-survey methods. These can be classified into two groups: location quotient (LQ) methods and constrained matrix-balancing methods. This paper focuses on the second group and, specifically, on the performance of the cross-entropy method (CE). The most important finding is that the RAS method slightly outperforms the CE method on average, but its efficiency varies greatly from country to country. On the contrary, the performance of the CE method is more stable over countries and time. More interestingly, a fair implementation of the CE method boosted by the Flegg location quotient (FLQ) method outperforming the competing CE approach in terms of accuracy.