Cancer stem cells are found in many cancer types. They comprise a distinct subpopulation of cells within the tumor that exhibit properties of stem cells. They express a number of cell surface markers, such as CD133, CD44, ALDH, and EpCAM, as well as embryonic transcription factors Oct4, Nanog, and SOX2. CSCs are more resistant to conventional chemotherapy and can potentially drive tumor relapse. Therefore, it is essential to understand the molecular mechanisms that drive chemoresistance and to target them with specific therapy effectively. Highly conserved developmental signaling pathways such as Wnt, Hedgehog, and Notch are commonly reported to play a role in CSCs chemoresistance development. Studies show that particular pathway inhibitors combined with conventional therapy may re-establish sensitivity to the conventional therapy. Another significant contributor of chemoresistance is a specific tumor microenvironment. Surrounding stroma in the form of cancer-associated fibroblasts, macrophages, endothelial cells, and extracellular matrix components produce cytokines and other factors, thus creating a favorable environment and decreasing the cytotoxic effects of chemotherapy. Anti-stromal agents may potentially help to overcome these effects. Epigenetic changes and autophagy were also among the commonly reported mechanisms of chemoresistance. This review provides an overview of signaling pathway components involved in the development of chemoresistance of CSCs and gathers evidence from experimental studies in which CSCs can be re-sensitized to conventional chemotherapy agents across different cancer types.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract that arises from a complex interplay of genetic susceptibility, immune dysregulation, environmental exposures, and altered host–microbiome interactions. Increasing evidence identifies the gut microbiota as a central component of IBD pathogenesis. In healthy individuals, the intestinal microbiota supports epithelial integrity, metabolic homeostasis, immune education, colonization resistance, and bidirectional gut–brain communication. In IBD, this ecosystem is disrupted by reduced microbial diversity, expansion of pathobionts, and broader functional alterations affecting community stability and metabolic output. Importantly, these changes are increasingly viewed not merely as consequences of inflammation, but as active contributors to disease development and persistence. Dysbiosis may also influence neuroimmune signaling through the gut–brain axis, linking microbial metabolites, intestinal barrier dysfunction, enteric nervous system activity, and psychological comorbidities frequently observed in patients with IBD. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the role of the gut microbiota in IBD, beginning with its physiological functions in intestinal homeostasis and the evidence linking dysbiosis to disease pathogenesis, followed by a critical evaluation of current microbiome-based therapeutic strategies, their translational challenges, and prospects for personalized microbiota-directed interventions. Approaches such as fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), probiotics, live biotherapeutic products, and genetically engineered bacteria aim to restore microbial balance and modulate intestinal inflammation. Among these, FMT has provided the strongest proof-of-concept for microbiome restoration, whereas probiotic efficacy remains variable and strain-dependent. Emerging defined microbial consortia and engineered bacterial platforms offer improved standardization and mechanistic precision, but their clinical application remains limited by challenges related to engraftment, durability of response, safety, and treatment optimization. Collectively, current evidence supports gut microbiota as both a key determinant of IBD pathogenesis and a promising therapeutic target, underscoring the need for more precise and personalized microbiota-directed approaches in IBD management.

Gene duplication underlies evolutionary innovation, yet many paralogues remain highly similar, raising questions about their functional divergence and physiological relevance. The spliceosomal Sm core protein SNRPB and its mammalian-specific paralogue SNRPN share over 90% sequence identity, but their distinct expression patterns - SNRPB being ubiquitous and SNRPN confined to the brain - suggest specialized functions. Why mammals have two different spliceosomes has remained obscure. Here, we generated isogenic human cell lines expressing ectopically either SNRPB or SNRPN exclusively and found that SNRPN stabilizes transcripts involved in energy metabolism and mitochondrial function, leading to increased mitochondrial abundance and oxygen consumption. Despite similar spliceosomal interactomes, SNRPN more strongly associates with the PRMT5 methylosome complex and exhibits dynamic arginine methylation in its C-terminal region that is sensitive to translation inhibition and amino acid availability. The SNRPN-dependent transcriptome responds to translation inhibition by stabilizing long, intron-rich genes involved in amino acid and energy metabolism. Our findings reveal a nutrient-sensitive, methylation-dependent mechanism that differentiates the two paralogues. This suggests that SNRPN functions as a metabolic-specialized spliceosomal subunit thereby providing tissue-specific adaptation of RNA processing in mammals.

Bladder cancer (BLCA) is a common and heterogeneous malignancy in which disease progression is driven not only by tumor-intrinsic alterations but also by dynamic interactions within the tumor microenvironment (TME). Increasing evidence positions the extracellular matrix (ECM) as a critical regulator of these processes. Matricellular proteins (MCPs), a group of nonstructural ECM-associated molecules, have emerged as key modulators of tumor–stroma communication. In BLCA, MCPs have been reported to display divergent, and in some cases opposing, associations or functions, with the same protein participating in both tumor promotion and suppression. Here, we review current evidence on the function of MCPs in BLCA and synthesize their bidirectional roles in carcinogenesis. MCPs contribute to tumor progression by promoting invasion, epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT), angiogenesis, and metastatic niche formation. At the same time, MCPs can restrain tumor growth by inhibiting angiogenesis, stabilizing ECM organization, inducing cell cycle arrest, and maintaining epithelial integrity. A key concept emerging from this body of evidence is the context-dependent functional plasticity of MCPs. We propose that MCP-associated phenotypes in BLCA may be influenced by contextual factors, including isoform diversity arising from alternative splicing and post-translational modifications, spatial compartmentalization within tumor and stromal niches, tumor microenvironmental composition, and molecular subtype. However, the level of supporting evidence differs substantially among MCPs, and direct BLCA-specific mechanistic evidence remains limited for many proposed relationships. These factors, therefore, provide a framework for interpreting divergent findings rather than representing universally established determinants of MCP function. Recognizing MCPs as context-sensitive regulators rather than fixed tumor-promoting or tumor-suppressing entities provides a unifying framework for understanding their roles in BLCA. This could be an important step for therapeutic targeting, encouraging effective strategies to consider and incorporate the molecular and microenvironmental context in which MCPs operate.