Roman Konovalov

Mr. Roman Konovalov

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

1Year (2026-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 August 2026 in Biomolecules
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ATAlim Turgaliyev
Alim Turgaliyev
RKRoman Konovalov
Roman Konovalov
ABAnton Borissenko
Anton Borissenko
DRDieter Riethmacher
Dieter Riethmacher
The extracellular matrix (ECM) in cancer differs from healthy tissue in structure, composition, and mechanical properties. Matricellular proteins (MCPs) play important roles in shaping ECM architecture during tissue remodeling. This narrative review, combined with a bioinformatics analysis, examines six major MCP families—Fasciclins, Tenascins, Thrombospondins, Small Leucine-Rich Proteoglycans, the SPARC family, and the CCN family—through a mechanobiological lens in bladder cancer. It summarizes current knowledge on the mechanical regulation of MCP expression, their effects on matrix stiffness, and their contributions to bladder cancer progression. Analyses of public datasets reveal that stromal cells are the predominant source of MCPs in the tumor microenvironment. Furthermore, mechanical upregulation and involvement in the formation of stiff ECM highlight MCPs as important players in a mechanotransduction feedback loop. While most MCPs exert pro-tumorigenic effects on bladder cancer cells, several display context-dependent or anti-tumorigenic activities. Existing studies have primarily focused on the isolated effects of MCPs on bladder cancer cell lines in two-dimensional systems or simple subcutaneous xenograft models. Both approaches fail to capture the context-dependent nature of MCPs and their involvement in ECM formation. These findings underscore the need for future studies to investigate the complex effects of MCPs on bladder cancer progression.

4 August 2026 in Biomedicines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SZSanzhar Zhetkenev
Sanzhar Zhetkenev
RKRoman Konovalov
Roman Konovalov
Azamat AkhmetkalitevAzamat Akhmetkalitev
Azamat Akhmetkalitev
ESEva Sonnenberg-Riethmacher
Eva Sonnenberg-Riethmacher
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract that arises from a complex interplay of genetic susceptibility, immune dysregulation, environmental exposures, and altered host–microbiome interactions. Increasing evidence identifies the gut microbiota as a central component of IBD pathogenesis. In healthy individuals, the intestinal microbiota supports epithelial integrity, metabolic homeostasis, immune education, colonization resistance, and bidirectional gut–brain communication. In IBD, this ecosystem is disrupted by reduced microbial diversity, expansion of pathobionts, and broader functional alterations affecting community stability and metabolic output. Importantly, these changes are increasingly viewed not merely as consequences of inflammation, but as active contributors to disease development and persistence. Dysbiosis may also influence neuroimmune signaling through the gut–brain axis, linking microbial metabolites, intestinal barrier dysfunction, enteric nervous system activity, and psychological comorbidities frequently observed in patients with IBD. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the role of the gut microbiota in IBD, beginning with its physiological functions in intestinal homeostasis and the evidence linking dysbiosis to disease pathogenesis, followed by a critical evaluation of current microbiome-based therapeutic strategies, their translational challenges, and prospects for personalized microbiota-directed interventions. Approaches such as fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), probiotics, live biotherapeutic products, and genetically engineered bacteria aim to restore microbial balance and modulate intestinal inflammation. Among these, FMT has provided the strongest proof-of-concept for microbiome restoration, whereas probiotic efficacy remains variable and strain-dependent. Emerging defined microbial consortia and engineered bacterial platforms offer improved standardization and mechanistic precision, but their clinical application remains limited by challenges related to engraftment, durability of response, safety, and treatment optimization. Collectively, current evidence supports gut microbiota as both a key determinant of IBD pathogenesis and a promising therapeutic target, underscoring the need for more precise and personalized microbiota-directed approaches in IBD management.