Amit Kumar Sharma

Dr. Amit Kumar Sharma

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2021 in Journal of Environmental Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PGPraveen Kumar Ghodke
Praveen Kumar Ghodke
ASAmit Kumar Sharma
Amit Kumar Sharma
JPJ.K. Pandey
J.K. Pandey
WCWei-Hsin Chen
Wei-Hsin Chen
APAlok Patel
Alok Patel
VAVeeramuthu Ashokkumar
Veeramuthu Ashokkumar

1 September 2016 in Bioresource Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ASAmit Kumar Sharma
Amit Kumar Sharma
PSPradeepta Kumar Sahoo
Pradeepta Kumar Sahoo
SSShailey Singhal
Shailey Singhal
GJGirdhar Joshi
Girdhar Joshi

31 May 2016 in 3 Biotech
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASAmit Kumar Sharma
Amit Kumar Sharma
PSPradeepta Kumar Sahoo
Pradeepta Kumar Sahoo
SSShailey Singhal
Shailey Singhal
ALOK PATELALOK PATEL
ALOK PATEL
In this study, five Chlorella species (Chlorella vulgaris, Chlorella minutissima, Chlorella pyrenoidosa, Chlorella sp.1 and Chlorella sp.2) were grown in various nutrient medium including BG-11, BBM, Fog’s medium and M4N medium for the evolution of biomass and lipid production potential. Among the tested medium, BG-11 was found most economical and efficient medium for all Chlorella species. To see the impact of organic carbon sources on lipid production potential, all microalgae species were also cultured in selected medium (BG-11) with different organic carbon sources like glucose, glycerol, sodium acetate, and sucrose under mixotrophic condition. The results showed that all Chlorella species performs better under mixotrophic condition, but Chlorella vulgaris achieved maximum lipid productivity (3.5 folds higher) in glycerol supplemented culture medium than control medium among all species.

26 May 2022 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PHPulla Rose Havilah
Pulla Rose Havilah
ASAmit Kumar Sharma
Amit Kumar Sharma
GGGopalakrishnan Govindasamy
Gopalakrishnan Govindasamy
Leonidas MatsakasLeonidas Matsakas
Leonidas Matsakas
ALOK PATELALOK PATEL
ALOK PATEL
Rapid climate change and forecasted damage from fossil fuel combustion, forced researchers to investigate renewable and clean energy sources for the sustainable development of societies throughout the world. Biomass-based energy is one of the most important renewable energy sources for meeting daily energy needs, which are gaining in popularity daily. Gasification-based bioenergy production is an effective way to replace fossil fuels and reduce CO2 emissions. Even though biomass gasification has been studied extensively, there is still much opportunity for improvement in terms of high-quality syngas generation (high H2/CO ratio) and reduced tar formation. Furthermore, the presence of tar has a considerable impact on syngas quality. Downdraft gasifiers have recently shown a significant potential for producing high-quality syngas with lower tar concentrations. This article presents a comprehensive review on the advancement in biomass downdraft gasification technologies for high-quality synthesis gas. In addition, factors affecting syngas production and composition e.g., equivalency ratio, temperature, particle size, and gasification medium on synthesis gas generation are also comprehensively studied. The up-gradation and various applications of synthesis gas are also discussed in brief in this review article.

10 February 2025 in Processes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASAmit Kumar Sharma
Amit Kumar Sharma
SJShivangi Jaryal
Shivangi Jaryal
SSShubham Sharma
Shubham Sharma
Archana DhyaniArchana Dhyani
Archana Dhyani
BTBhagya Sindhu Tewari
Bhagya Sindhu Tewari
Neelima MahatoNeelima Mahato
Neelima Mahato
Rising global energy demands, depleting fossil fuel reserves, and growing environmental concerns have led to an increasing demand for clean and renewable energy sources. Recently, microalgae biofuels have emerged as a promising and sustainable energy source due to their high biomass productivity, lipid content, and wastewater treatment capabilities. However, the viability of microalgae biofuels as a commercial-scale renewable fuel remains uncertain due to high production costs and storage stability issues. This review focuses on advanced technologies aimed at enhancing both the production of microalgae biodiesel and its storage stability. It explores the potential and challenges of recent developments in microalgae cultivation systems, particularly those factors that have contributed to increased lipid content in microalgae biomass. The study also examines the role of industrial wastewater in promoting microalgae growth and provides an overview of recent advances in biodiesel production. Additionally, it discusses various strategies to improve the storage stability of biodiesel, a critical consideration for the commercialization of microalgae biodiesel.

ASAmit Kumar Sharma
Amit Kumar Sharma
PSPankaj Sharma
Pankaj Sharma
VCVenkateswarlu Chintala
Venkateswarlu Chintala
NKNarayan Khatri
Narayan Khatri
ALOK PATELALOK PATEL
ALOK PATEL
Biodiesel derived from biomass is a renewable source of fuel, and global application of biodiesel in the transport sector has rapidly expanded over the last decade. However, effort has been made to overcome its main shortcoming, i.e., efficiency and exhaust emission characteristics (NOx emissions) in unmodified diesel engines. Biodiesel combustion generally results in lower unburned hydrocarbons (HC), carbon monoxide (CO), and particulate matter (PM) in exhaust emissions compared to fossil diesel. In this study, various biodiesel blends (Chlorella vulgaris, Jatropha curcus, and Calophyllum inophyllum) were investigated for fuel characteristics, and engine performance with exhaust emission compared to diesel. Chlorella vulgaris, Jatropha curcus, and Calophyllum inophyllum biodiesel were synthesized by the acid–base transesterification approach in a microwave reactor and blended with conventional diesel fuel by volume. The fuel blends were denoted as MB10 (90% diesel + 10% microalgae biodiesel), MB20 (80% diesel + 20% microalgae biodiesel), JB10 (90% diesel + 10% jatropha biodiesel), JB20 (80% diesel + 20% jatropha biodiesel), PB10 (90% diesel + 10% polanga biodiesel) and PB20 (80% diesel + 20% polanga biodiesel). Experiments were performed using these fuel blends with a single-cylinder four-stroke diesel engine at different loads. It was shown in the results that, at rated load, thermal efficiency of the engine decreased from 34.6% with diesel to 34.1%, 33.7%, 34.1%, 34.0%, 33.9%, and 33.5% with MB10, MB20, JB10, JB20, PB10, and PB20 fuels, respectively. Unburned hydrocarbon, carbon monoxide and smoke emissions improved with third-generation fuels (MB10, MB20) in comparison to base diesel fuel and second-generation fuels (JB10, JB20, PB10 and PB20). Oxides of nitrogen emissions were slightly increased with both the third- and second-generation fuels as compared to the base diesel. The combustion behavior of microalgae biodiesel was also very close to diesel fuels. In the context of comparable engine performance, emissions, and combustion characteristics, along with biofuel production yield (per year per acre), microalgae biodiesel could have a great potential as a next-generation sustainable fuel in compression engine (CI) engines compared to jatropha and polanga biodiesel fuels.