Henning Willers

Dr. Henning Willers


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 September 2011 in Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MWMeng Wang
Meng Wang
FMFabian Morsbach
Fabian Morsbach
DSDavid Sander
David Sander
LGLiliana Gheorghiu
Liliana Gheorghiu
ANAkash Nanda
Akash Nanda
HWHenning Willers
Henning Willers
The mechanisms by which inhibition of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) sensitizes non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells to ionizing radiation remain poorly understood. We set out to characterize the radiosensitizing effects of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor erlotinib and the monoclonal antibody cetuximab in NSCLC cells that contain wild-type p53. Unexpectedly, EGFR inhibition led to pronounced cellular senescence but not apoptosis of irradiated cells, both in vitro and in vivo. Senescence was completely dependent on wild-type p53 and associated with a reduction in cell number as well as impaired clonogenic radiation survival. Study of ten additional NSCLC cell lines revealed that senescence is a prominent mechanism of radiosensitization in 45% of cell lines and occurs not only in cells with wild-type p53 but also in cells with mutant p53, where it is associated with an induction of p16. Interestingly, senescence and radiosensitization were linked to an increase in residual radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks irrespective of p53/p16 status. This effect of EGFR inhibition was at least partially mediated by disruption of the MEK–ERK pathway. Thus, our data indicate a common mechanism of radiosensitization by erlotinib or cetuximab across diverse genetic backgrounds. Our findings also suggest that assays that are able to capture the initial proliferative delay that is associated with senescence should be useful for screening large cell line panels to identify genomic biomarkers of EGFR inhibitor–mediated radiosensitization. Cancer Res; 71(19); 6261–9. ©2011 AACR.

13 April 2017 in Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MWMeng Wang
Meng Wang
JHJing Han
Jing Han
LMLynnette Marcar
Lynnette Marcar
JBJosh Black
Josh Black
QI LiuQI Liu
QI Liu
HWHenning Willers
Henning Willers
Lung cancers with activating KRAS mutations are characterized by treatment resistance and poor prognosis. In particular, the basis for their resistance to radiation therapy is poorly understood. Here, we describe a radiation resistance phenotype conferred by a stem-like subpopulation characterized by mitosis-like condensed chromatin (MLCC), high CD133 expression, invasive potential, and tumor-initiating properties. Mechanistic investigations defined a pathway involving osteopontin and the EGFR in promoting this phenotype. Osteopontin/EGFR–dependent MLCC protected cells against radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks and repressed putative negative regulators of stem-like properties, such as CRMP1 and BIM. The MLCC-positive phenotype defined a subset of KRAS-mutated lung cancers that were enriched for co-occurring genomic alterations in TP53 and CDKN2A. Our results illuminate the basis for the radiation resistance of KRAS-mutated lung cancers, with possible implications for prognostic and therapeutic strategies. Cancer Res; 77(8); 2018–28. ©2017 AACR.

1 July 2018 in Radiotherapy and Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HWHenning Willers
Henning Willers
AAAntino Allen
Antino Allen
DGDavid Grosshans
David Grosshans
SMStephen J. Mcmahon
Stephen J. Mcmahon
CNCläre Von Neubeck
Cläre Von Neubeck
BVBhadrasain Vikram
Bhadrasain Vikram
In the clinic, proton beam therapy (PBT) is based on the use of a generic relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 1.1 compared to photons in human cancers and normal tissues. However, the experimental basis for this RBE lacks any significant number of representative tumor models and clinically relevant endpoints for dose-limiting organs at risk. It is now increasingly appreciated that much of the variations of treatment responses in cancers are due to inter-tumoral genomic heterogeneity. Indeed, recently it has been shown that defects in certain DNA repair pathways, which are found in subsets of many cancers, are associated with a RBE increase in vitro. However, there currently exist little in vivo or clinical data that confirm the existence of similarly increased RBE values in human cancers. Furthermore, evidence for variable RBE values for normal tissue toxicity has been sparse and conflicting to date. If we could predict variable RBE values in patients, we would be able to optimally use and personalize PBT. For example, predictive tumor biomarkers may facilitate selection of patients with proton-sensitive cancers previously ineligible for PBT. Dose de-escalation may be possible to reduce normal tissue toxicity, especially in pediatric patients. Knowledge of increased tumor RBE may allow us to develop biologically optimized therapies to enhance local control while RBE biomarkers for normal tissues could lead to a better understanding and prevention of unusual PBT-associated toxicity. Here, we will review experimental data on the repair of proton damage to DNA that impact both RBE values and biophysical modeling to predict RBE variations. Experimental approaches for studying proton sensitivity in vitro and in vivo will be reviewed as well and recent clinical findings discussed. Ultimately, therapeutically exploiting the understudied biological advantages of protons and developing approaches to limit treatment toxicity should fundamentally impact the clinical use of PBT.

1 April 2015 in International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
QI LiuQI Liu
QI Liu
PGPriyanjali Ghosh
Priyanjali Ghosh
NMNicole Magpayo
Nicole Magpayo
MTMauro Testa
Mauro Testa
STShikui Tang
Shikui Tang
HWHenning Willers
Henning Willers

3 February 2000 in Oncogene
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HWHenning Willers
Henning Willers
EMEllen E McCarthy
Ellen E McCarthy
BWBiao Wu
Biao Wu
HWHannah Wunsch
Hannah Wunsch
WTWei Tang
Wei Tang
SPSimon N Powell
Simon N Powell

18 November 2019 in British Journal of Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AMAimee McNamara
Aimee McNamara
HWHenning Willers
Henning Willers
HPHarald Paganetti
Harald Paganetti
Dose in proton radiotherapy is generally prescribed by scaling the physical proton dose by a constant value of 1.1. Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) is defined as the ratio of doses required by two radiation modalities to cause the same level of biological effect. The adoption of an RBE of 1.1. assumes that the biological efficacy of protons is similar to photons, allowing decades of clinical dose prescriptions from photon treatments and protocols to be utilized in proton therapy. There is, however, emerging experimental evidence that indicates that proton RBE varies based on technical, tissue and patient factors. The notion that a single scaling factor may be used to equate the effects of photons and protons across all biological endpoints and doses is too simplistic and raises concern for treatment planning decisions. Here, we review the models that have been developed to better predict RBE variations in tissue based on experimental data as well as using a mechanistic approach.