QI Liu

Dr. QI Liu

Shenzhen Bay Laboratory, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 April 2017 in Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MWMeng Wang
Meng Wang
JHJing Han
Jing Han
LMLynnette Marcar
Lynnette Marcar
JBJosh Black
Josh Black
QI LiuQI Liu
QI Liu
HWHenning Willers
Henning Willers
Lung cancers with activating KRAS mutations are characterized by treatment resistance and poor prognosis. In particular, the basis for their resistance to radiation therapy is poorly understood. Here, we describe a radiation resistance phenotype conferred by a stem-like subpopulation characterized by mitosis-like condensed chromatin (MLCC), high CD133 expression, invasive potential, and tumor-initiating properties. Mechanistic investigations defined a pathway involving osteopontin and the EGFR in promoting this phenotype. Osteopontin/EGFR–dependent MLCC protected cells against radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks and repressed putative negative regulators of stem-like properties, such as CRMP1 and BIM. The MLCC-positive phenotype defined a subset of KRAS-mutated lung cancers that were enriched for co-occurring genomic alterations in TP53 and CDKN2A. Our results illuminate the basis for the radiation resistance of KRAS-mutated lung cancers, with possible implications for prognostic and therapeutic strategies. Cancer Res; 77(8); 2018–28. ©2017 AACR.

1 April 2015 in International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
QI LiuQI Liu
QI Liu
PGPriyanjali Ghosh
Priyanjali Ghosh
NMNicole Magpayo
Nicole Magpayo
MTMauro Testa
Mauro Testa
STShikui Tang
Shikui Tang
HWHenning Willers
Henning Willers

1 December 2018 in Clinical Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
QI LiuQI Liu
QI Liu
LMLin Ma
Lin Ma
TJTrevor Jones
Trevor Jones
LPLuis Palomero
Luis Palomero
MPMiquel Angel Pujana
Miquel Angel Pujana
MBMary Helen Barcellos-Hoff
Mary Helen Barcellos-Hoff
Purpose: Following cytotoxic therapy, 70% of patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) are alive at 5 years compared with 30% of those with similar HPV-negative cancer. Loss of TGFβ signaling is a poorly studied consequence of HPV that could contribute to patient outcome by compromising DNA repair. Experimental Design: Human HNSCC cell lines (n = 9), patient-derived xenografts (n = 9), tissue microarray (n = 194), TCGA expression data (n = 279), and primary tumor specimens (n = 10) were used to define the relationship between TGFβ competency, response to DNA damage, and type of DNA repair. Results: Analysis of HNSCC specimens in situ and in vitro showed that HPV associated with loss of TGFβ signaling that increased response to radiation or cisplatin. TGFβ suppressed miR-182, which inhibited both BRCA1, necessary for homologous recombination repair (HRR), and FOXO3, required for ATM kinase activity. TGFβ signaling blockade by either HPV or inhibitors released miR182 control, compromised HRR and increased response to PARP inhibition. Antagonizing miR-182 rescued the HRR deficit in HPV-positive cells. Loss of TGFβ signaling unexpectedly increased repair by error prone, alternative end-joining (alt-EJ). Conclusions: HPV-positive HNSCC cells are unresponsive to TGFβ. Abrogated TGFβ signaling compromises repair by HRR and increases reliance on alt-EJ, which provides a mechanistic basis for sensitivity to PARP inhibitors. The effect of HPV in HNSCC provides critical validation of TGFβ’s role in DNA repair proficiency and further raises the translational potential of TGFβ inhibitors in cancer therapy.

12 February 2016 in Frontiers in Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KHKathryn D. Held
Kathryn D. Held
HKHidemasa Kawamura
Hidemasa Kawamura
TKTakuya Kaminuma
Takuya Kaminuma
APAthena Evalour S. Paz
Athena Evalour S. Paz
YYYukari Yoshida
Yukari Yoshida
Akihisa TakahashiAkihisa Takahashi
Akihisa Takahashi
The use of charged particle therapy in cancer treatment is growing rapidly, in large part because the exquisite dose localization of charged particles allows for higher radiation doses to be given to tumor tissue while normal tissues are exposed to lower doses and decreased volumes of normal tissues are irradiated. In addition, charged particles heavier than protons have substantial potential clinical advantages because of their additional biological effects including greater cell killing effectiveness, decreased radiation resistance of hypoxic cells in tumors and reduced cell cycle dependence of radiation response. These biological advantages depend on many factors such as endpoint, cell or tissue type, dose, dose rate or fractionation, charged particle type and energy, and oxygen concentration. This review summarizes the unique biological advantages of charged particle therapy and highlights recent research and areas of particular research needs, such as quantification of Relative Biological Effectiveness (RBE) for various tumor types and radiation qualities, role of genetic background of tumor cells in determining response to charged particles, sensitivity of cancer stem-like cells to charged particles, role of charged particles in tumors with hypoxic fractions and importance of fractionation, including use of hypofractionation, with charged particles.

1 March 2013 in International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
QI LiuQI Liu
QI Liu
FSFrank Schneider
Frank Schneider
LMLin Ma
Lin Ma
FWFrederik Wenz
Frederik Wenz
CHCarsten Herskind
Carsten Herskind

1 October 2015 in Seminars in Radiation Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HWHenning Willers
Henning Willers
LGLiliana Gheorghiu
Liliana Gheorghiu
QI LiuQI Liu
QI Liu
JEJason A. Efstathiou
Jason A. Efstathiou
LWLori J. Wirth
Lori J. Wirth
CNCläre Von Neubeck
Cläre Von Neubeck