Eva Schernhammer

Prof. Eva Schernhammer

Department of Epidemiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Wien, Austria
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

32Years (1995-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2004 in Nature Reviews Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MPMichael N. Pollak
Michael N. Pollak
Eva SchernhammerEva Schernhammer
Eva Schernhammer
SHSusan E. Hankinson
Susan E. Hankinson

17 October 2001 in JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Eva SchernhammerEva Schernhammer
Eva Schernhammer
FLFrancine Laden
Francine Laden
FSFrank E. Speizer
Frank E. Speizer
WWWalter C. Willett
Walter C. Willett
DHDavid J. Hunter
David J. Hunter
GCGraham A Colditz
Graham A Colditz
Background: Melatonin shows potential oncostatic action, and light exposure during night suppresses melatonin production. There is little information, however, about the direct effect of night work on the risk of cancer. We investigated the effect of night work in breast cancer. Methods: We examined the relationship between breast cancer and working on rotating night shifts during 10 years of follow-up in 78 562 women from the Nurses' Health Study. Information was ascertained in 1988 about the total number of years during which the nurses had worked rotating night shifts with at least three nights per month. From June 1988 through May 1998, we documented 2441 incident breast cancer cases. Logistic regression models were used to calculate relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusted for confounding variables and breast cancer risk factors. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: We observed a moderate increase in breast cancer risk among the women who worked 1–14 years or 15–29 years on rotating night shifts (multivariate adjusted RR = 1.08 [95% CI = 0.99 to 1.18] and RR = 1.08 [95% CI = 0.90 to 1.30], respectively). The risk was further increased among women who worked 30 or more years on the night shift (RR = 1.36; 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.78). The test for trend was statistically significant (P = .02). Conclusions: Women who work on rotating night shifts with at least three nights per month, in addition to days and evenings in that month, appear to have a moderately increased risk of breast cancer after extended periods of working rotating night shifts.

1 December 2004 in American Journal of Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Eva SchernhammerEva Schernhammer
Eva Schernhammer
GCGraham A Colditz
Graham A Colditz

4 June 2003 in JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Eva SchernhammerEva Schernhammer
Eva Schernhammer
FLFrancine Laden
Francine Laden
FSFrank E. Speizer
Frank E. Speizer
WWWalter C. Willett
Walter C. Willett
DHDavid J. Hunter
David J. Hunter
GCGraham A Colditz
Graham A Colditz
Exposure to light at night suppresses the physiologic production of melatonin, a hormone that has antiproliferative effects on intestinal cancers. Although observational studies have associated night-shift work with an increased risk of breast cancer, the effect of night-shift work on the risk of other cancers is not known. We prospectively examined the relationship between working rotating night shifts and the risk of colorectal cancers among female participants in the Nurses’ Health Study. We documented 602 incident cases of colorectal cancer among 78 586 women who were followed up from 1988 through 1998. Compared with women who never worked rotating night shifts, women who worked 1–14 years or 15 years or more on rotating night shifts had multivariate relative risks of colorectal cancer of 1.00 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.84 to 1.19) and 1.35 (95% CI = 1.03 to 1.77), respectively (Ptrend = .04). These data suggest that working a rotating night shift at least three nights per month for 15 or more years may increase the risk of colorectal cancer in women.

6 December 2011 in PLOS Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
APAn Pan
An Pan
Eva SchernhammerEva Schernhammer
Eva Schernhammer
QSQi Sun
Qi Sun
FHFrank B. Hu
Frank B. Hu
Rotating night shift work disrupts circadian rhythms and has been associated with obesity, metabolic syndrome, and glucose dysregulation. However, its association with type 2 diabetes remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate this association in two cohorts of US women. We followed 69,269 women aged 42–67 in Nurses' Health Study I (NHS I, 1988–2008), and 107,915 women aged 25–42 in NHS II (1989–2007) without diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer at baseline. Participants were asked how long they had worked rotating night shifts (defined as at least three nights/month in addition to days and evenings in that month) at baseline. This information was updated every 2–4 years in NHS II. Self-reported type 2 diabetes was confirmed by a validated supplementary questionnaire. We documented 6,165 (NHS I) and 3,961 (NHS II) incident type 2 diabetes cases during the 18–20 years of follow-up. In the Cox proportional models adjusted for diabetes risk factors, duration of shift work was monotonically associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes in both cohorts. Compared with women who reported no shift work, the pooled hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for participants with 1–2, 3–9, 10–19, and ≥20 years of shift work were 1.05 (1.00–1.11), 1.20 (1.14–1.26), 1.40 (1.30–1.51), and 1.58 (1.43–1.74, p-value for trend <0.001), respectively. Further adjustment for updated body mass index attenuated the association, and the pooled hazard ratios were 1.03 (0.98–1.08), 1.06 (1.01–1.11), 1.10 (1.02–1.18), and 1.24 (1.13–1.37, p-value for trend <0.001). Our results suggest that an extended period of rotating night shift work is associated with a modestly increased risk of type 2 diabetes in women, which appears to be partly mediated through body weight. Proper screening and intervention strategies in rotating night shift workers are needed for prevention of diabetes. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary

1 March 2006 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CKCandyce H. Kroenke
Candyce H. Kroenke
LKLaura D. Kubzansky
Laura D. Kubzansky
Eva SchernhammerEva Schernhammer
Eva Schernhammer
MHMichelle D. Holmes
Michelle D. Holmes
IKIchiro Kawachi
Ichiro Kawachi
Purpose: We prospectively examined social ties and survival after breast cancer diagnosis.Patients and Methods: Participants included 2,835 women from the Nurses' Health Study who were diagnosed with stages 1 to 4 breast cancer between 1992 and 2002. Of these women, 224 deaths (107 of these related to breast cancer) accrued to the year 2004. Social networks were assessed in 1992, 1996, and 2000 with the Berkman-Syme Social Networks Index. Social support was assessed in 1992 and 2000 as the presence and availability of a confidant. Cox proportional hazards models were used in prospective analyses of social networks and support, both before and following diagnosis, and subsequent survival.Results: In multivariate-adjusted analyses, women who were socially isolated before diagnosis had a subsequent 66% increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR = 1.66; 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.65) and a two-fold increased risk of breast cancer mortality (HR = 2.14; 95% CI, 1.11 to 4.12) compared with women who were socially integrated. Women without close relatives (HR = 2.65; 95% CI, 1.03 to 6.82), friends (HR = 4.06; 95% CI, 1.40 to 11.75), or living children (HR = 5.62; 95% CI, 1.20 to 26.46) had elevated risks of breast cancer mortality and of all-cause mortality compared with those with the most social ties. Neither participation in religious or community activities nor having a confidant was related to outcomes. Effect estimates were similar in analyses of postdiagnosis networks.Conclusion: Socially isolated women had an elevated risk of mortality after a diagnosis of breast cancer, likely because of a lack of access to care, specifically beneficial caregiving from friends, relatives, and adult children.