This article outlines the input data and partial shading conditions employed in the replication model of Sequential Monte Carlo (SMC)-based tracking techniques for photovoltaic (PV) systems. The model aims to compare the performance of classical perturb and observe (P&O) algorithm, particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm, flower pollination algorithm (FPA), and SMC-based tracking techniques. The mathematical design and methodology of the complete PV system were detailed in our prior research, titled "Dynamic and Adaptive Maximum Power Point Tracking Using Sequential Monte Carlo Algorithm for Photovoltaic System" by Odat et al. (2023) [1]. The provided data facilitate precise replication of the output, saving significant simulation time. Additionally, these data can be readily applied to compare algorithmic results referenced by (Babu, T.S. et al., 2015; PrasanthRam, J. et al., 2017) [2,3], and contribute to the development of new processes for practical applications.
15 June 2023 in Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering
Jordan experienced flash floods that resulted in numerous fatalities and injuries. This research focuses on identifying the Wadi Mujib’s flash flood potential zones and evaluating their potential magnitude. In this work, hydrological models were developed by integrating GIS settings with HEC-HMS software (V. 4.11). The hydrological model for Wadi Mujib is simulated in this research by means of the Soil Conservation Service (curve number method) while using rainfall data from 1970 to 2022. The results show that the optimum curve number values (CN) were 78.5 at normal antecedent moisture content. Additionally, in order to aid in the decision-making process for flash flood warnings, a flash flood potential index (FFPI) was also introduced based on four main physiographic parameters (slope, land use, plant cover, and soil texture) ranging from 1 to 10. The accumulative chart’s FFPI threshold, which indicates the areas with the highest potential for flash floods, was set at 95% or above. The FFPI threshold was chosen using the accumulative chart of FFPI, which shows that the FFPM threshold value is 7 and covers 13.39% of the study area.