Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2011; 33: 697–706 Summary Background Accuracy of intraepithelial lymphocytes counts for diagnosing mild enteropathy coeliac disease in absence of villous atrophy can be limited by inappropriate controls included in the studies. Aim To determine the diagnostic accuracy of intraepithelial lymphocytes counts utilising controls lacking HLA coeliac disease‐associated alleles. Methods Intraepithelial lymphocytes counting at villus tip and per 100 enterocytes was performed at haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and CD3‐stainings in: 29 cases (21 with potential coeliac disease and 8 affected by latent coeliac disease) representing the patient population and 14 noncoeliac controls lacking HLA‐DQ2/DQ8 alleles. Results Threshold (mean + 2 s.d.) of duodenal intraepithelial lymphocytes at villus tip and per 100 enterocytes in noncoeliac controls was respectively: 3.5 and 18 at H&E, 3.2 and 17 following CD3‐staining. Considering the whole patient population, the sensitivity of tip intraepithelial lymphocytes in detecting mild enteropathy coeliac disease was 90% (95% CI = 72.6–97.8) both at H&E and CD3‐stainings. The sensitivity of intraepithelial lymphocytes per 100 enterocytes was 93% (95% CI = 77.2–99.2) both at H&E and CD3‐staining. Specificity of both intraepithelial lymphocytes counts was 100% (95% CI = 76.8–100). Using a threshold of 25 intraepithelial lymphocytes per 100 enterocytes could miss 59% of cases at H&E and 48% following CD3‐staining. Conclusions Intraepithelial lymphocytes counts are diagnostic feasible tools to detect mild enteropathy coeliac disease. Threshold of duodenal intraepithelial lymphocytes may be lower than currently accepted.
8 February 2025 in Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Background: There are scarce data available on upadacitinib in children with Crohn's disease (CD).Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of upadacitinib as an induction therapy in paediatric CD.Methods: This was a multicentre retrospective study between 2022 and 2024 of children treated with upadacitinib for induction of remission of active CD conducted in 30 centres worldwide affiliated with the IBD Interest and Porto group of the ESPGHAN. We recorded demographic, clinical and laboratory data and adverse events (AEs) at week 8 post‐induction. The analysis of the primary outcome was based upon the intention‐to‐treat (ITT) principle.Results: We included 100 children (median age 15.8 [interquartile range 14.3–17.2]). All were previously treated with biologic therapies including 89 with ≥ 2 biologics. At the end of the 8‐week induction period, we observed clinical response, clinical remission and corticosteroid‐ and exclusive enteral nutrition‐free clinical remission (CFR) in 75%, 56% and 52%, respectively. By the end of induction, 68% had achieved normalisation of C‐reactive protein, and 58% had faecal calprotectin (FC) < 150 mcg/g. There was combined CFR and FC remission in 13/31 children with available data at 8 weeks (13% of the ITT population). AEs were recorded in 24 children; the most frequent was acne in 12. Two AEs (severe acne and hypertriglyceridemia) led to discontinuation of therapy.Conclusion: Upadacitinib is an effective induction therapy for refractory paediatric CD. Efficacy should be weighed against the potential risks of AEs.
28 November 2024 in Journal of Crohn's and Colitis
Background and Aims: Data on upadacitinib therapy in children with ulcerative colitis (UC) or unclassified inflammatory bowel disease (IBD-U) are scarce. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of upadacitinib as an induction therapy in pediatric UC or IBD-U. Methods: In this multicenter retrospective study, children treated with upadacitinib for induction of remission of active UC or IBD-U from 30 centers worldwide were enrolled. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data, as well as adverse events (AEs), were recorded at Week 8 post-induction. Results: One hundred children were included (90 UC and 10 IBD-U, median age 15.6 [interquartile range 13.3–17.1] years). Ninety-eight were previously treated with biologic therapies, and 76 were treated with ≥2 biologics. At the end of the 8-week induction period, clinical response, clinical remission, and corticosteroid-free clinical remission (CFR) were observed in 84%, 62%, and 56% of the children, respectively. Normal C-reactive protein and fecal calprotectin (FC) <150 mcg/g were achieved in 75% and 50%, respectively. Combined CFR and FC remission was observed in 18/46 (39%) children with available data at 8 weeks. Adverse events were recorded in 37 children, including 1 serious AE of an appendiceal neuroendocrine tumor. The most frequent AEs were hyperlipidemia (n = 13), acne (n = 12), and infections (n = 10, 5 of whom with herpes viruses). Conclusions: Upadacitinib is an effective induction therapy for refractory pediatric UC and IBD-U. Efficacy should be weighed against the potential risks of AEs.
The effects of gluten free diet (GFD) on body mass index (BMI) and growth parameters in pediatric patients with celiac disease (CD) and their dependence on different socio-cultural environments are poorly known. We conducted an international retrospective study on celiac patients diagnosed at the University of Verona, Italy, and at the University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA, as underweight. A total of 140 celiac children and 140 controls (mean age 8.4 years) were enrolled in Chicago; 125 celiac children and 125 controls (mean age 7.3 years, NS) in Verona. At time of diagnosis, Italian celiac children had a weight slightly lower (p = 0.060) and a BMI z-score significantly (p < 0.001) lower than their American counterparts. On GFD, Italian celiac children showed an increased prevalence of both underweight (19%) as well as overweight (9%), while American children showed a decrease prevalence of overweight/obese. We concluded that while the GFD had a similar impact on growth of celiac children in both countries, the BMI z-score rose more in American than in Italian celiac children. Additionally, in Italy, there was an alarming increase in the proportion of celiac children becoming underweight. We speculate that lifestyle and cultural differences may explain the observed variations.
About Me
I am a physician working at Pediatric Liver Transplantation Center in Italy
I am a physician working at Pediatric Liver Transplantation Center in Italy