Agroecology represents a pertinent option to improve the sustainability of agriculture. To promote its application, agroecological concepts should be taught to students and professionals in the agricultural sector. However, most agricultural courses are not adapted to teach these concepts due to little interactivity or interdisciplinarity, and a lack of a systems approach to farm management. Serious games help to fill these gaps by simulating complex models in which players can learn by doing. We thus developed a serious computer game, called SEGAE (SErious Game for AgroEcology learning), which represents a mixed crop-livestock farm and assesses impacts of farming practices on indicators related to environmental, economic, and social sustainability. Its pedagogical interest was evaluated through two types of surveys given to university students who played the game during a one-week workshop: A knowledge survey on agroecology, and a feedback survey based on flow theory. Results showed that students increased their knowledge of agroecology significantly, particularly those who had had little knowledge of crop production. More than 86% of the students enjoyed the game, appreciating its interaction and feedback. Thus, SEGAE is an interesting tool to help students acquire knowledge of agroecology in a fun way by facilitating interdisciplinary and collaborative learning.

Organic dairy farmers must live up to the organic goal of 'good health' in respect the organic principles and regulation. Veterinarians could be the organic dairy farmers' expected sparring partners in reaching this goal but have found difficulties to establish advisory relationships with them. The objectives of this study are -from organic dairy farmers' points of view- (i) to describe farmers' objectives and strategies regarding herd health, (ii) to describe private veterinarians' roles in farmers' animal health promotion strategies and (iii) to identify farmers' reasons for accepting veterinarians in an advisory role. Fourteen organic dairy farmers were interviewed using qualitative research interviews. Data collection and analysis was performed using a modified approach to Grounded Theory. Organic dairy farmers had animal health management strategies focusing on animal health promotion. Veterinarians had most often solely the role of therapist in farmers' animal health management strategies. Reasons explaining that veterinarians were not able to establish advisory roles were found in the differences between veterinarians and farmers regarding their animal health strategies and solutions to disease problems. Furthermore, veterinarians did not always share farmers' (organic) objectives, values and priorities and this could lead to disagreement on the best choice in animal health management practices. This might be further amplified in situations where there exists a lack of dialogue and mutual interest in other.

The performance of dairy herds is affected mainly by factors related to cows' characteristics and herd management practices. However, these factors are interrelated, and as such, the estimation of their individual effect on the performance of dairy herds remains difficult. The aim of this study was to estimate the weight of these factors as well the interactions between them on the reproductive and economic performance of dairy farms. A stochastic dynamic model was used to simulate most physiological and management processes occurring on a dairy farm. A herd of 60 Holstein cows, with a milk yield of 8,000 L/cow-year, representative of French Holstein dairy herds, was simulated. A total of 216 scenarios were run by combining 2 levels of postpartum cyclicity resumption (average: 45 d, high: 75 d), 3 levels of 21-d conception rate of the herd (i.e., proportion of cows pregnant 21 d after insemination; low: 25%, average: 45%, high: 70%), 3 levels of probability of pregnancy loss until 120 d (low: 3%, average: 15%, high: 43%), 3 levels of sensitivity of estrus detection by the farmer (low: 20%, average: 50%, high: 90%), 2 alternative managerial goals (constant number of cows or constant volume of milk sold), and 2 types of management for the sale and purchase of animals (closed or open herd). The effect of each factor was estimated by sensitivity analysis. The parameter that had the greatest effect on reproductive performance was the sensitivity of estrus detection: a 10-percentage-point increase between the low and average levels and between the average and high levels reduced the calving interval by 16 and 5.7 d, respectively. However, the factor that had the greatest effect on economic performance was the 21-d conception rate: a 10-percentage-point increase between the low and average levels and between the average and high levels increased the gross margin by €62.2 and €22.3/cow-year, respectively. The pregnancy loss until 120 d had an effect on economic performance: an increase of 1 percentage point of this parameter decreased the gross margin by €2/cow-year. The other factors studied, and their interactions, did not have a major effect (low value of sensitivity indices). Closed herds or farms with a constant number of cows had economic losses of €58/cow-year compared with open herds or to farms with constant volume of milk sold. Altogether, our data suggest that, in a typical French dairy farm, farmers' efforts on estrus detection will be more profitable when associated with improvement of the conception rate of the cows.