Alessandro Lavacchi

Dr. Alessandro Lavacchi

Istituto di Chimica dei Composti OrganoMetallici (ICCOM-CNR), Via Madonna del Piano 10, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Firenze, Italy

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 June 2014 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Yan-Xin ChenYan-Xin Chen
Yan-Xin Chen
ALAlessandro Lavacchi
Alessandro Lavacchi
Hamish  MillerHamish Miller
Hamish Miller
MBM. Bevilacqua
M. Bevilacqua
JFJ. Filippi
J. Filippi
Francesco  VizzaFrancesco Vizza
Francesco Vizza

24 March 2022 in ChemSusChem
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Carlo SantoroCarlo Santoro
Carlo Santoro
ALAlessandro Lavacchi
Alessandro Lavacchi
Piercarlo MustarelliPiercarlo Mustarelli
Piercarlo Mustarelli
VNVito Di Noto
Vito Di Noto
LELior Elbaz
Lior Elbaz
Frédéric JaouenFrédéric Jaouen
Frédéric Jaouen
As highlighted by the recent roadmaps from the European Union and the United States, water electrolysis is the most valuable high‐intensity technology for producing green hydrogen. Currently, two commercial low‐temperature water electrolyzer technologies exist: alkaline water electrolyzer (A‐WE) and proton‐exchange membrane water electrolyzer (PEM‐WE). However, both have major drawbacks. A‐WE shows low productivity and efficiency, while PEM‐WE uses a significant amount of critical raw materials. Lately, the use of anion‐exchange membrane water electrolyzers (AEM‐WE) has been proposed to overcome the limitations of the current commercial systems. AEM‐WE could become the cornerstone to achieve an intense, safe, and resilient green hydrogen production to fulfill the hydrogen targets to achieve the 2050 decarbonization goals. Here, the status of AEM‐WE development is discussed, with a focus on the most critical aspects for research and highlighting the potential routes for overcoming the remaining issues. The Review closes with the future perspective on the AEM‐WE research indicating the targets to be achieved.

8 April 2016 in Angewandte Chemie International Edition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Hamish  MillerHamish Miller
Hamish Miller
ALAlessandro Lavacchi
Alessandro Lavacchi
Francesco  VizzaFrancesco Vizza
Francesco Vizza
Marcello MarelliMarcello Marelli
Marcello Marelli
Francesco Di BenedettoFrancesco Di Benedetto
Francesco Di Benedetto
DDDario R. Dekel
Dario R. Dekel

1 March 2006 in Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Stefano CaporaliStefano Caporali
Stefano Caporali
UBU. Bardi
U. Bardi
ALAlessandro Lavacchi
Alessandro Lavacchi

12 February 2013 in ChemSusChem
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Andrea MarchionniAndrea Marchionni
Andrea Marchionni
MBManuela Bevilacqua
Manuela Bevilacqua
CBClaudio Bianchini
Claudio Bianchini
Yan-Xin ChenYan-Xin Chen
Yan-Xin Chen
JFJonathan Filippi
Jonathan Filippi
Francesco  VizzaFrancesco Vizza
Francesco Vizza

24 August 2023 in Electrochemical Energy Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EBEnrico Berretti
Enrico Berretti
Luigi OsmieriLuigi Osmieri
Luigi Osmieri
Vincenzo BaglioVincenzo Baglio
Vincenzo Baglio
Hamish  MillerHamish Miller
Hamish Miller
Filippi JonathanFilippi Jonathan
Filippi Jonathan
ALAlessandro Lavacchi
Alessandro Lavacchi
In the last 20 years, direct alcohol fuel cells (DAFCs) have been the subject of tremendous research efforts for the potential application as on-demand power sources. Two leading technologies respectively based on proton exchange membranes (PEMs) and anion exchange membranes (AEMs) have emerged: the first one operating in an acidic environment and conducting protons; the second one operating in alkaline electrolytes and conducting hydroxyl ions. In this review, we present an analysis of the state-of-the-art acidic and alkaline DAFCs fed with methanol and ethanol with the purpose to support a comparative analysis of acidic and alkaline systems, which is missing in the current literature. A special focus is placed on the effect of the reaction stoichiometry in acidic and alkaline systems. Particularly, we point out that, in alkaline systems, OH− participates stoichiometrically to reactions, and that alcohol oxidation products are anions. This aspect must be considered when designing the fuel and when making an energy evaluation from a whole system perspective. Graphical Abstract