Enrico Berretti

Dr. Enrico Berretti

CNR-ICCOM (Italian Nationa Research Council - Institute for the Chemistry of OrganoMetallic Compounds), Rome, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 August 2023 in Electrochemical Energy Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EBEnrico Berretti
Enrico Berretti
Luigi OsmieriLuigi Osmieri
Luigi Osmieri
Vincenzo BaglioVincenzo Baglio
Vincenzo Baglio
Hamish  MillerHamish Miller
Hamish Miller
Filippi JonathanFilippi Jonathan
Filippi Jonathan
ALAlessandro Lavacchi
Alessandro Lavacchi
In the last 20 years, direct alcohol fuel cells (DAFCs) have been the subject of tremendous research efforts for the potential application as on-demand power sources. Two leading technologies respectively based on proton exchange membranes (PEMs) and anion exchange membranes (AEMs) have emerged: the first one operating in an acidic environment and conducting protons; the second one operating in alkaline electrolytes and conducting hydroxyl ions. In this review, we present an analysis of the state-of-the-art acidic and alkaline DAFCs fed with methanol and ethanol with the purpose to support a comparative analysis of acidic and alkaline systems, which is missing in the current literature. A special focus is placed on the effect of the reaction stoichiometry in acidic and alkaline systems. Particularly, we point out that, in alkaline systems, OH− participates stoichiometrically to reactions, and that alcohol oxidation products are anions. This aspect must be considered when designing the fuel and when making an energy evaluation from a whole system perspective. Graphical Abstract

1 August 2025 in Chemical Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MMMohsin Muhyuddin
Mohsin Muhyuddin
Carlo SantoroCarlo Santoro
Carlo Santoro
Luigi OsmieriLuigi Osmieri
Luigi Osmieri
VFValerio C.A. Ficca
Valerio C.A. Ficca
AFAriel Friedman
Ariel Friedman
PAPlamen Atanassov
Plamen Atanassov
Hydrogen is a green and sustainable energy vector that can facilitate the large-scale integration of intermittent renewable energy, renewable fuels for heavy transport, and deep decarbonization of hard-to-abate industries. Anion-exchange-membrane water electrolyzers (AEM-WEs) have several achieved or expected competitive advantages over other electrolysis technologies, including the use of precious metal-free electrocatalysts at both electrodes, fluorine-free hydrocarbon-based ionomeric membranes and bipolar plates based on inexpensive materials. Contrasting the analogous proton-exchange-membrane system (PEM-WE), where pure water is circulated (no support electrolyte), the current generation of AEM-WEs necessitates the circulation of a dilute aqueous alkaline electrolyte for reaching high energy efficiency and durability. For several reasons, including but not limited to lower cost of balance-of-plant, lower operating cost and improved device's lifetime, achieving high cell efficiency and performance using an alkali-free water feed is highly desirable. In this review, we develop and build a foundational understanding of AEM-WEs operating with pure water, as well as discuss the effects of operating with natural water feeds like seawater. After a discussion of the possible advantages of pure-water-fed AEM-WEs, we cover the thermodynamic and kinetic processes involved in AEM-WE, followed by a detailed review of materials and components and their integration in the device. We highlight the influence of electrolyte composition and alkali/electrolyte-free feed on the membrane-electrode assembly, ionomers, electrocatalysts, porous transport layer, bipolar plates and operating configuration. We provide evidence for how the pure water feed engenders several issues related to the degradation of device components and propose mitigation strategies.

11 December 2020 in Coatings
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Walter GiurlaniWalter Giurlani
Walter Giurlani
EBEnrico Berretti
Enrico Berretti
Massimo InnocentiMassimo Innocenti
Massimo Innocenti
ALAlessandro Lavacchi
Alessandro Lavacchi
Thickness dramatically affects the functionality of coatings. Accordingly, the techniques in use to determine the thickness are of utmost importance for coatings research and technology. In this review, we analyse some of the most appropriate methods for determining the thickness of metallic coatings. In doing so, we classify the techniques into two categories: (i) destructive and (ii) non-destructive. We report on the peculiarity and accuracy of each of these methods with a focus on the pros and cons. The manuscript also covers practical issues, such as the complexity of the procedure and the time required to obtain results. While the analysis focuses most on metal coatings, many methods are also applicable to films of other materials.

31 October 2016 in ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Giulia TuciGiulia Tuci
Giulia Tuci
LLLapo Luconi
Lapo Luconi
Andrea RossinAndrea Rossin
Andrea Rossin
EBEnrico Berretti
Enrico Berretti
HBHousseinou Ba
Housseinou Ba
Giuliano GiambastianiGiuliano Giambastiani
Giuliano Giambastiani

17 November 2023 in Applied Catalysis B: Environment and Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MMMohsin Muhyuddin
Mohsin Muhyuddin
EBEnrico Berretti
Enrico Berretti
SMSeyed Ariana Mirshokraee
Seyed Ariana Mirshokraee
JOJacopo Orsilli
Jacopo Orsilli
RLRoberto Lorenzi
Roberto Lorenzi
Carlo SantoroCarlo Santoro
Carlo Santoro

29 January 2019 in Coatings
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Walter GiurlaniWalter Giurlani
Walter Giurlani
EBEnrico Berretti
Enrico Berretti
Massimo InnocentiMassimo Innocenti
Massimo Innocenti
ALAlessandro Lavacchi
Alessandro Lavacchi
X-ray fluorescence is often employed in the measurement of the thickness of coatings. Despite its widespread nature, the task is not straightforward because of the complex physics involved, which results in high dependence on matrix effects. Thickness quantification is accomplished using the Fundamental Parameters approach, adjusted with empirical measurements of standards with known composition and thickness. This approach has two major drawbacks: (i) there are no standards for any possible coating and coating architecture and (ii) even relying on standards, the quantification of unknown samples requires the precise knowledge of the matrix nature (e.g., in the case of multilayer coatings the thickness and composition of each underlayer). In this work, we describe a semiquantitative approach to coating thickness measurement based on the construction of calibration curves through simulated XRF spectra built with Monte Carlo simulations. Simulations have been performed with the freeware software XMI-MSIM. We have assessed the accuracy of the methods by comparing the results with those obtained by (i) XRF thickness determination with standards and (ii) FIB-SEM cross-sectioning. Then we evaluated which parameters are critical in this kind of indirect thickness measurement.