Patrizia Gnagnarella

Dr. Patrizia Gnagnarella

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

32Years (1995-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 1996 in Annals of Epidemiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ADAdriano Decarli
Adriano Decarli
SFSilvia Franceschi
Silvia Franceschi
MFMonica Ferraroni
Monica Ferraroni
PGPatrizia Gnagnarella
Patrizia Gnagnarella
MPMaria Parpinel
Maria Parpinel
AGAttilio Giacosa
Attilio Giacosa

21 March 2007 in European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NSN Slimani
N Slimani
GDG Deharveng
G Deharveng
IUI Unwin
I Unwin
DSD A T Southgate
D A T Southgate
JVJ Vignat
J Vignat
ERElio Riboli
Elio Riboli

1 June 2008 in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PGPatrizia Gnagnarella
Patrizia Gnagnarella
Sara GandiniSara Gandini
Sara Gandini
Carlo La VecchiaCarlo La Vecchia
Carlo La Vecchia
PMPatrick Maisonneuve
Patrick Maisonneuve
Background: Factors linked to glucose metabolism play an important role in the development of cancers, and both glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) have been investigated as potential etiologic factors. Objective: A meta-analysis was performed to explore the association between GI and GL and cancer risk from published studies. Design: A comprehensive, systematic bibliographic search of the medical literature was conducted to identify relevant studies. Case-control and cohort studies published before October 2007 that reported cancer risk estimates for GI and GL were included. Pooled relative risks (RRs) were estimated for breast, colorectal, endometrial, and pancreatic cancer. Results: Thirty-nine studies were included in the meta-analysis. The interquantile ranges of GL were significantly wider in case-control studies, most of which were conducted in European countries, than in cohort studies. Cohort studies that presented lower ranges of GL also reported lower risk estimates. Overall, both GL and GI were significantly associated with a greater risk of colorectal (summary RR = 1.26; 95% CI: 1.11, 1.44 and RR = 1.18; 95% CI: 1.05, 1.34, respectively) and endometrial (RR = 1.36; 95% CI: 1.14, 1.62 and RR = 1.22; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.49) cancer than of breast and pancreatic cancer. There was, however, a significant between-study heterogeneity for colorectal cancer (P < 0.0001). The association between GL and breast cancer disappeared when publication bias was taken into account. No association was found for pancreatic cancer. Conclusion: This comprehensive meta-analysis of GI and GL and cancer risk suggested an overall direct association with colorectal and endometrial cancer.

1 January 1995 in Annals of Epidemiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SFSilvia Franceschi
Silvia Franceschi
FBFabio Barbone
Fabio Barbone
ENEva Negri
Eva Negri
ADAdriano Decarli
Adriano Decarli
MFMonica Ferraroni
Monica Ferraroni
Carlo La VecchiaCarlo La Vecchia
Carlo La Vecchia

1 June 2004 in Journal of Food Composition and Analysis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PGPatrizia Gnagnarella
Patrizia Gnagnarella
MPMaria Parpinel
Maria Parpinel
SSSimonetta Salvini
Simonetta Salvini
SFSilvia Franceschi
Silvia Franceschi
DPDomenico PALLI
Domenico PALLI
PBPeter Boyle
Peter Boyle

1 April 2005 in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Cristina BosettiCristina Bosetti
Cristina Bosetti
LSLuana Spertini
Luana Spertini
MPMaria Parpinel
Maria Parpinel
PGPatrizia Gnagnarella
Patrizia Gnagnarella
PLPagona Lagiou
Pagona Lagiou
Carlo La VecchiaCarlo La Vecchia
Carlo La Vecchia
Few epidemiologic studies have investigated the potential relation between flavonoids and breast cancer risk. We have applied recently published data on the composition of foods and beverages in terms of six principal classes of flavonoids (i.e., flavanones, flavan-3-ols, flavonols, flavones, anthocyanidines, and isoflavones) on dietary information collected in a large-case control study of breast cancer conducted in Italy between 1991 and 1994. The study included 2,569 women with incident, histologically confirmed breast cancer, and 2,588 hospital controls. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals were estimated by multiple logistic regression models. After allowance for major confounding factors and energy intake, a reduced risk of breast cancer was found for increasing intake of flavones (OR, 0.81, for the highest versus the lowest quintile; P-trend, 0.02), and flavonols (OR, 0.80; P-trend, 0.06). No significant association was found for other flavonoids, including flavanones (OR, 0.95), flavan-3-ols (OR, 0.86), anthocyanidins (OR, 1.09), as well as for isoflavones (OR, 1.05). The findings of this large study of an inverse association between flavones and breast cancer risk confirm the results of a Greek study.