Enrique Morán-Tejeda

Dr. Enrique Morán-Tejeda

Department of Geography, University of the Balearic Islands, Palma, Spain

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 December 2012 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Sergio Vicente-SerranoSergio Vicente-Serrano
Sergio Vicente-Serrano
Célia GouveiaCélia Gouveia
Célia Gouveia
J Julio CamareroJ Julio Camarero
J Julio Camarero
SBSantiago Beguería
Santiago Beguería
RTRicardo Machado Trigo
Ricardo Machado Trigo
ALArturo Sanchez Lorenzo
Arturo Sanchez Lorenzo
We evaluated the response of the Earth land biomes to drought by correlating a drought index with three global indicators of vegetation activity and growth: vegetation indices from satellite imagery, tree-ring growth series, and Aboveground Net Primary Production (ANPP) records. Arid and humid biomes are both affected by drought, and we suggest that the persistence of the water deficit (i.e., the drought time-scale) could be playing a key role in determining the sensitivity of land biomes to drought. We found that arid biomes respond to drought at short time-scales; that is, there is a rapid vegetation reaction as soon as water deficits below normal conditions occur. This may be due to the fact that plant species of arid regions have mechanisms allowing them to rapidly adapt to changing water availability. Humid biomes also respond to drought at short time-scales, but in this case the physiological mechanisms likely differ from those operating in arid biomes, as plants usually have a poor adaptability to water shortage. On the contrary, semiarid and subhumid biomes respond to drought at long time-scales, probably because plants are able to withstand water deficits, but they lack the rapid response of arid biomes to drought. These results are consistent among three vegetation parameters analyzed and across different land biomes, showing that the response of vegetation to drought depends on characteristic drought time-scales for each biome. Understanding the dominant time-scales at which drought most influences vegetation might help assessing the resistance and resilience of vegetation and improving our knowledge of vegetation vulnerability to climate change.

26 June 2012 in Earth Interactions
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Sergio Vicente-SerranoSergio Vicente-Serrano
Sergio Vicente-Serrano
SBSantiago Beguería
Santiago Beguería
JLJorge Lorenzo-Lacruz
Jorge Lorenzo-Lacruz
J Julio CamareroJ Julio Camarero
J Julio Camarero
Juan Ignacio López-MorenoJuan Ignacio López-Moreno
Juan Ignacio López-Moreno
ALArturo Sanchez Lorenzo
Arturo Sanchez Lorenzo
In this study, the authors provide a global assessment of the performance of different drought indices for monitoring drought impacts on several hydrological, agricultural, and ecological response variables. For this purpose, they compare the performance of several drought indices [the standardized precipitation index (SPI); four versions of the Palmer drought severity index (PDSI); and the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI)] to predict changes in streamflow, soil moisture, forest growth, and crop yield. The authors found a superior capability of the SPEI and the SPI drought indices, which are calculated on different time scales than the Palmer indices to capture the drought impacts on the aforementioned hydrological, agricultural, and ecological variables. They detected small differences in the comparative performance of the SPI and the SPEI indices, but the SPEI was the drought index that best captured the responses of the assessed variables to drought in summer, the season in which more drought-related impacts are recorded and in which drought monitoring is critical. Hence, the SPEI shows improved capability to identify drought impacts as compared with the SPI. In conclusion, it seems reasonable to recommend the use of the SPEI if the responses of the variables of interest to drought are not known a priori.

1 March 2018 in The Cryosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMartin Beniston
Martin Beniston
DFDaniel Farinotti
Daniel Farinotti
MSMarkus Stoffel
Markus Stoffel
LALiss M. Andreassen
Liss M. Andreassen
ECErika Coppola
Erika Coppola
CVChristian Vincent
Christian Vincent
The mountain cryosphere of mainland Europe is recognized to have important impacts on a range of environmental processes. In this paper, we provide an overview on the current knowledge on snow, glacier, and permafrost processes, as well as their past, current, and future evolution. We additionally provide an assessment of current cryosphere research in Europe and point to the different domains requiring further research. Emphasis is given to our understanding of climate–cryosphere interactions, cryosphere controls on physical and biological mountain systems, and related impacts. By the end of the century, Europe's mountain cryosphere will have changed to an extent that will impact the landscape, the hydrological regimes, the water resources, and the infrastructure. The impacts will not remain confined to the mountain area but also affect the downstream lowlands, entailing a wide range of socioeconomical consequences. European mountains will have a completely different visual appearance, in which low- and mid-range-altitude glaciers will have disappeared and even large valley glaciers will have experienced significant retreat and mass loss. Due to increased air temperatures and related shifts from solid to liquid precipitation, seasonal snow lines will be found at much higher altitudes, and the snow season will be much shorter than today. These changes in snow and ice melt will cause a shift in the timing of discharge maxima, as well as a transition of runoff regimes from glacial to nival and from nival to pluvial. This will entail significant impacts on the seasonality of high-altitude water availability, with consequences for water storage and management in reservoirs for drinking water, irrigation, and hydropower production. Whereas an upward shift of the tree line and expansion of vegetation can be expected into current periglacial areas, the disappearance of permafrost at lower altitudes and its warming at higher elevations will likely result in mass movements and process chains beyond historical experience. Future cryospheric research has the responsibility not only to foster awareness of these expected changes and to develop targeted strategies to precisely quantify their magnitude and rate of occurrence but also to help in the development of approaches to adapt to these changes and to mitigate their consequences. Major joint efforts are required in the domain of cryospheric monitoring, which will require coordination in terms of data availability and quality. In particular, we recognize the quantification of high-altitude precipitation as a key source of uncertainty in projections of future changes. Improvements in numerical modeling and a better understanding of process chains affecting high-altitude mass movements are the two further fields that – in our view – future cryospheric research should focus on.

1 April 2014 in Environmental Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Sergio Vicente-SerranoSergio Vicente-Serrano
Sergio Vicente-Serrano
Juan Ignacio López-MorenoJuan Ignacio López-Moreno
Juan Ignacio López-Moreno
SBSantiago Beguería
Santiago Beguería
JLJorge Lorenzo-Lacruz
Jorge Lorenzo-Lacruz
ALArturo Sanchez Lorenzo
Arturo Sanchez Lorenzo
FEFrancisco Espejo
Francisco Espejo

1 February 2012 in Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Sergio Vicente-SerranoSergio Vicente-Serrano
Sergio Vicente-Serrano
Juan Ignacio López-MorenoJuan Ignacio López-Moreno
Juan Ignacio López-Moreno
SBSantiago Beguería
Santiago Beguería
JLJorge Lorenzo-Lacruz
Jorge Lorenzo-Lacruz
CACesar Azorin-Molina
Cesar Azorin-Molina
Enrique Morán-TejedaEnrique Morán-Tejeda
Enrique Morán-Tejeda
In this study, the authors investigated an approach to calculate the standardized streamflow index (SSI), which allows accurate spatial and temporal comparison of the hydrological conditions of a stream or set of streams. For this purpose, the capability of six three-parameter distributions (lognormal, Pearson Type III, log-logistic, general extreme value, generalized Pareto, and Weibull) and two different approaches to select the most suitable distribution the best monthly fit (BMF) and the minimum orthogonal distance (MD), were tested by using a monthly streamflow data set for the Ebro Basin (Spain). This large Mediterranean basin is characterized by high variability in the magnitude of streamflows and in seasonal regimes. The results show that the most commonly used probability distributions for flow frequency analysis provided good fits to the streamflow series. Thus, the visual inspection of the L-moment diagrams and the results of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test did not enable the selection of a single ...