Flotation is a complex process that exhibits high dimensionality which makes modeling and optimization very challenging. One technique to alleviate the dimensionality problem is to combine variables together into more informative ones. Bubble surface area flux and air recovery are examples of dimensionality reduction. Gas holdup also captures the effect of a plurality of variables including gas rate, bubble size, surfactant type, and concentration. This work makes use of a dual flotation–conductivity cell to explore the relationship between gas dispersion properties, including frother concentration and flotation performance. Results demonstrate that gas holdup effectively captured the effect of gas rate and frother concentration and better correlates to flotation performance.
This paper describes a method to predict water recovery rate into and through the foam in a bubble column operating under different gas rates, froth depths, and frother types and concentrations. Three frothers were considered: Metil Isobutil Carbinol (MIBC), a proprietary blend of alcohols, aldehydes, and esters commercialized under the name PINNACLE® 9891, and a PGE-based Dow Froth 1012 (DF1012). The water rate entering into the froth (foam) layer from the bubbly (collection) zone was estimated as the water rate overflowing the column when operating at a thin stable foam layer, i.e., 0.5 cm. It was observed that the rate at which water entered into the froth phase could be modelled as a unique linear function of the gas holdup below the froth, regardless of the frother chemistry. This is a fundamental result not previously found in the literature that also facilitates the calculation of the froth zone water recovery for deeper froths. The water recovery in the froth was found to be an inverse logarithmic function of the average liquid residence time in the froth. Although the same trend was observed for the three frothers tested, they did not converge into a single function, which suggests that frother chemistry plays a role in determining froth structure and then needs to be incorporated when modeling water transport in the froth. Finally, the water overflow rate calculated as the product of the water rate into the froth and froth water recovery predicted the actual measured values fairly well. The water transport model here proposed provides a simple representation of the interactions between collection and froth zone and its relation to easily measure operating variables.
Froth flotation is a process in which hydrophobic particles attach to bubbles forming particle–bubble aggregates, which are transported to the top section of the cell where they overflow to form the concentrate. Particles also reach the concentrate by entrainment, which is a non-selective process that leads to low concentrate grades. The objective of this work was to study and compare the degree of entrainment measured using three methods, in fresh and seawater, and using methyl isobutyl carbinol (MIBC) and DF-250 as frothers. The experimental results indicated that the degree of entrainment decreased in seawater. Besides, water recovery was lower in the experiments with seawater regardless of the frother that was used in the experiments, which correlated with the observed low degrees of entrainment. It is proposed that the reduction of entrainment and water recovery in seawater can be explained by a reduction of air recovery and/or more bubble coalescence in the froth. It is also proposed that surfactant diffusion/convection from the lamellae to the Plateau borders in the froth is reduced in seawater, which reduces the surface tension gradients, and thus the restoring liquid flow from the Plateau borders to the lamellae.
Minerals flotation is a widely used process to produce base metal concentrates through the selective capture of particles on the surface of bubbles. The process performance depends on the size distribution of the bubble population generated by gas dispersion, which is characterized by three variables: superficial gas velocity, gas holdup, and bubble size. A literature review revealed that current instrumentation cannot provide reliable on-line measurement of these variables except for gas velocity. There are some promising alternatives for gas holdup, but bubble size measurement will continue to be unavailable. The use of a model that integrates the three gas dispersion variables makes possible the calculation of one of the variables when knowing the values of the other two. Modelling bubble flow has been pursued using two approaches: determining the bubble terminal velocity reduction by the presence of other bubbles and regarding the bubble swarm as a packed bed through which a fluid is allowed to flow. Models based on these approaches (drift-flux and Molerus, respectively) were found in the literature and used to assess their prediction ability. Gas holdup predictions for known values of gas velocity and bubble size showed similar trends for both models; Molerus results were always higher than those obtained with the drift-flux model, and the difference between both predictions increased with bubble size and gas velocity. A relationship between bubble surface area flux and gas holdup was explored (a single line was expected); Molerus values showed a noticeable effect of bubble size, while drift-flux results showed a minor effect of bubble size only for gas holdups below 10%. Model accuracy was established using a data set collected to characterize frother roles in flotation for six commercial frothers, which included values of the three gas dispersion variables measured simultaneously and reported at the same conditions. The results indicate that bubble size predictions obtained from Molerus model are closer to the measured values than those obtained from the drift-flux model. Drift-flux predictions systematically underestimated the measured bubble size, with relative errors between 10 and 30%, while Molerus predictions showed values around the measured size with relative errors not larger than 15% (and in most cases below 10%). The accuracy of the Molerus predictions is acceptable for applications in the control of individual cells and flotation circuits operation. Further testing to assess the performance of Molerus model with data collected in lab and industrial mechanical cells and columns, where conditions in the test volume may not be stable or homogeneous, is recommended.
20 March 2024 in Physicochemical Problems of Mineral Processing
The impact of air distribution on the metallurgical performance of a flotation bank operating with a mineral slurry having a moderate and high frother concentration is assessed. A flotation bank of two and three 5L Denver cells was implemented, and air flow was distributed down the bank as...