The Internet of Things (IoT) provides everyday objects and environments with “intelligence” and data connectivity to improve quality of life and the efficiency of a wide range of human activities. However, the ongoing exponential growth of the IoT device ecosystem—up to tens of billions of units to date—poses a challenge regarding how to power such devices. This Progress Report discusses how energy harvesting can address this challenge. It then discusses how indoor photovoltaics (IPV) constitutes an attractive energy harvesting solution, given its deployability, reliability, and power density. For IPV to provide an eco‐friendly route to powering IoT devices, it is crucial that its underlying materials and fabrication processes are low‐toxicity and not harmful to the environment over the product life cycle. A range of IPV technologies—both incumbent and emerging—developed to date is discussed, with an emphasis on their environmental sustainability. Finally, IPV based on emerging lead‐free perovskite‐inspired absorbers are examined, highlighting their status and prospects for low‐cost, durable, and efficient energy harvesting that is not harmful to the end user and environment. By examining emerging avenues for eco‐friendly IPV, timely insight is provided into promising directions toward IPV that can sustainably power the IoT revolution.

A general semiconductor-independent two-dimensional character of the carrier distribution in top-gate polymer field-effect transistors is revealed by analysing temperature-dependent transfer characteristics and the sub-bandgap absorption tails of the polymer semiconductors. A correlation between the extracted width of the density of states and the Urbach energy is presented, corroborating the 2D accumulation layer and demonstrating an intricate connection between optical measurements concerning disorder and charge transport in transistors.

With the exponential rise in the market value and number of devices part of the Internet of Things (IoT), the demand for indoor photovoltaics (IPV) to power autonomous devices is predicted to rapidly increase. Lead‐free perovskite‐inspired materials (PIMs) have recently attracted significant attention in photovoltaics research, due to the similarity of their electronic structure to high‐performance lead‐halide perovskites, but without the same toxicity limitations. However, the capability of PIMs for indoor light harvesting has not yet been considered. Herein, two exemplar PIMs, BiOI and Cs₃Sb₂Cl_xI_9‐x are examined. It is shown that while their bandgaps are too wide for single‐junction solar cells, they are close to the optimum for indoor light harvesting. As a result, while BiOI and Cs₃Sb₂Cl_xI_9‐x devices are only circa 1%‐efficient under 1‐sun illumination, their efficiencies increase to 4–5% under indoor illumination. These efficiencies are within the range of reported values for hydrogenated amorphous silicon, i.e., the industry standard for IPV. It is demonstrated that such performance levels are already sufficient for millimeter‐scale PIM devices to power thin‐film‐transistor circuits. Intensity‐dependent and optical loss analyses show that future improvements in efficiency are possible. Furthermore, calculations of the optically limited efficiency of these and other low‐toxicity PIMs reveal their considerable potential for IPV, thus encouraging future efforts for their exploration for powering IoT devices.

Photodetector technologies based on emerging semiconductors—for example, organic semiconductors, halide perovskites, quantum dots, low-dimensional semiconductors and metal oxides—hold considerable promise for next-generation optoelectronics. However, the breadth and multidisciplinarity of this field, alongside its diverse range of applications, have resulted in inconsistent performance characterization and reporting practices, hindering the effective benchmarking of these technologies. Here we present a consensus among researchers from academia and industry on accurately capturing the key performance metrics of photodetectors based on emerging semiconductors and utilizing the photoelectric effect. We analyse their underlying assumptions, discuss common misunderstandings, and provide guidelines for accurate characterization and reporting. Additionally, we discuss the benchmarking of these photodetector technologies with respect to diverse applications. We expect that these comprehensive guidelines for characterization, reporting and benchmarking will accelerate and streamline further advancements in the field, propelling emerging photodetector technologies towards their full potential.