Luis Valença Pinto

Mr. Luis Valença Pinto

CERNAS
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
27 June 2023 in Oxford Open Infrastructure and Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LPLuis Valença Pinto
Luis Valença Pinto
MIMiguel Inácio
Miguel Inácio
PPPaulo Pereira
Paulo Pereira
The article explores the contributions of urban green and blue infrastructure (UGBI) and nature-based solutions (NbS) to enhance human and ecological well-being and health in urban areas. It delves into the concepts of UGBI and NbS, highlighting their importance in creating sustainable and liveable cities. We consider UGBI natural elements in the urban environment, grouped into different typologies. NbS are considered solutions, or actions, to promote environmental and human health based on the use of UGBI. The assessment was done under the umbrella of human and ecosystem health, linking well-being dimensions from the Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services—freedom of choice, social relations, mental health, physical health, food security and physical security—with the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals, showing a link with 12 of the 15 goals. The article presents non-exhaustive lists of UGBI types and NbS actions linked to well-being dimensions. We assess ecosystem services provided by GBI and NbS and the implications of incorporating these solutions in urban environments for human and ecosystem health and the future of healthy and liveable cities.

17 August 2020 in Environmental Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RCRaïsa Carmen
Raïsa Carmen
Sander JacobsSander Jacobs
Sander Jacobs
MLMichael Leone
Michael Leone
JPJulia Palliwoda
Julia Palliwoda
LPLuis Valença Pinto
Luis Valença Pinto
António Dinis  FerreiraAntónio Dinis Ferreira
António Dinis Ferreira
With increasing urbanisation, urban green spaces are expected to be crucial for urban resilience and sustainability, through the delivery of ecological, economic and social benefits. In practice, however, planning, management and evaluation of urban green spaces are rarely structured and evidence-based. This represents a missed opportunity to account for, track and foster the multiple benefits that green spaces are expected to deliver. To gain insight into this gap, this study assesses the availability and uptake of relevant evidence by city governments. Interviews, focus groups and quantitative surveys were applied in four medium-sized European cities: Coimbra (Portugal), Genk (Belgium), Leipzig (Germany), and Vilnius (Lithuania), covering the main governance and climatic gradients in Europe. Using straightforward data exploration and regression, we analyse which ecological, economic and social indicators are typically chosen by cities and why. Together with the city stakeholders, we derived a common set of benefit categories and key performance indicators which can be adapted to diverse local contexts. We conclude that cities tend to make pragmatic decisions when composing their indicator sets, but nevertheless cover multiple urban green space dimensions. Finally, we explore how indicator choice could be optimised towards a complementary and credible indicator set, taking into account a realistically feasible monitoring effort undertaken by the cities.

10 March 2022 in Geography and Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LPLuis Valença Pinto
Luis Valença Pinto
CFCarla Ferreira
Carla Ferreira
Miguel InácioMiguel Inácio
Miguel Inácio
PPPaulo Pereira
Paulo Pereira

3 February 2021 in Land
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Jörg PriessJörg Priess
Jörg Priess
LPLuis Valença Pinto
Luis Valença Pinto
IMIeva Misiūnė
Ieva Misiūnė
JPJulia Palliwoda
Julia Palliwoda
The majority of Europeans live in cities, where parks as components of Urban Green Spaces (UGSs) play an important role in well-being and the provision of ecosystem services (ES). UGSs are especially relevant for the implementation of the United Nations (UN) Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals “Good health and wellbeing” (Goal 3) and “Sustainable cities and communities” (Goal 11). This study focused on ES use and users’ motives, which were surveyed during visits at central parks in the cities Leipzig, Coimbra and Vilnius. Park visitors used 17 different ES, dominated by physical interactions such as walking or biking, followed by experiential and aesthetical ES and ES linked to social relations. Age of visitors, cultural setting and distance to homes influenced ES use in the parks differently in each city, limiting the transferability of park—user behaviour or motivations across different spatial and cultural contexts. Results also indicate that aligning sustainability objectives and usability, good accessibility of urban parks plays a central role and encourages the use of non-motorized or public transport for park visits. Concrete information about UGS user motivation and behaviour generated in this and similar studies contributes to convert the UN Agenda 2030 strategies at the municipal level into sustainability and user-oriented design and management of UGS.

7 April 2023 in Heliyon
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LPLuis Valença Pinto
Luis Valença Pinto
MIMiguel Inácio
Miguel Inácio
KBKatažyna Bogdzevič
Katažyna Bogdzevič
MKMarius Kalinauskas
Marius Kalinauskas
Eduardo GomesEduardo Gomes
Eduardo Gomes
PPPaulo Pereira
Paulo Pereira
Assessing preferences of recreational activities related to cultural ecosystem services (CES) in urban areas is essential for decision-making and urban green space (UGS) management. This work aims to assess the preferences and factors (based on socio-demographic and motivation variables) influencing CES-related activities in Vilnius, Lithuania, to provide scientific knowledge to support more efficient UGS design and management. Participatory mapping was reported as relevant for urban park planning and decision-making and was applied to identify spatially explicit CES. We assessed the perceived relevance of five CES-related activities groups (Social activities, Inspirational activities, Cultural activities, Spiritual activities, and Physical activities) via participatory mapping through an online survey (n = 1.114). The users selected one preferred geographic location for each CES-related activities group and attributed relevance (using a 5-point Likert scale) for a set of motivation items. The results showed that Physical and Social activities were the respondents' most important CES-related activity groups, while Spiritual activities were the less popular. Factor Analysis showed that the respondent's recreation experience preferences, or motivations, were the most relevant variables influencing all the groups except for the Social activities group. Regarding Cultural activities, preferences for understanding things & learn about history were the most relevant variables. For Inspirational activities, the variables developing knowledge & to learn were the most important. Enjoying nature's quietness & frequency was the most relevant for Physical activities. Regarding Spiritual activities, the most important variables were related to the development of spiritual activities and the reflection on personal religious values. Finally, socio-demographic variables mainly influenced social activities, namely education level, gender and age group. The spatial distribution was different between activity groups. Inspirational activities showed the highest dispersion, and Spiritual activities the highest concentration. The results of this work are relevant to municipal managers, as they allow for a better understanding of users' interactions with the territory, its multifunctionality, and potential areas of conflict between conservation and recreation.

5 February 2025 in Geography and Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Eglė BaltranaitėEglė Baltranaitė
Eglė Baltranaitė
Miguel InácioMiguel Inácio
Miguel Inácio
LPLuis Valença Pinto
Luis Valença Pinto
KBKatarzyna Bogdziewicz
Katarzyna Bogdziewicz
JRJorge Rocha
Jorge Rocha
PPPaulo Pereira
Paulo Pereira