Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), i. e., the quantification of serum or plasma concentrations of medications for dose optimization, has proven a valuable tool for the patient-matched psychopharmacotherapy. Uncertain drug adherence, suboptimal tolerability, non-response at therapeutic doses, or pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions are typical situations when measurement of medication concentrations is helpful. Patient populations that may predominantly benefit from TDM in psychiatry are children, pregnant women, elderly patients, individuals with intelligence disabilities, forensic patients, patients with known or suspected genetically determined pharmacokinetic abnormalities or individuals with pharmacokinetically relevant comorbidities. However, the potential benefits of TDM for optimization of pharmacotherapy can only be obtained if the method is adequately integrated into the clinical treatment process. To promote an appropriate use of TDM, the TDM expert group of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Neuropsychopharmakologie und Pharmakopsychiatrie (AGNP) issued guidelines for TDM in psychiatry in 2004. Since then, knowledge has advanced significantly, and new psychopharmacologic agents have been introduced that are also candidates for TDM. Therefore the TDM consensus guidelines were updated and extended to 128 neuropsychiatric drugs. 4 levels of recommendation for using TDM were defined ranging from “strongly recommended” to “potentially useful”. Evidence-based “therapeutic reference ranges” and “dose related reference ranges” were elaborated after an extensive literature search and a structured internal review process. A “laboratory alert level” was introduced, i. e., a plasma level at or above which the laboratory should immediately inform the treating physician. Supportive information such as cytochrome P450 substrate- and inhibitor properties of medications, normal ranges of ratios of concentrations of drug metabolite to parent drug and recommendations for the interpretative services are given. Recommendations when to combine TDM with pharmacogenetic tests are also provided. Following the guidelines will help to improve the outcomes of psychopharmacotherapy of many patients especially in case of pharmacokinetic problems. Thereby, one should never forget that TDM is an interdisciplinary task that sometimes requires the respectful discussion of apparently discrepant data so that, ultimately, the patient can profit from such a joint effort.

We investigated whether morphine and its pro-drug codeine are substrates of the highly genetically polymorphic organic cation transporter OCT1 and whether OCT1 polymorphisms may affect morphine and codeine pharmacokinetics in humans. Morphine showed low transporter-independent membrane permeability (0.5 × 10⁻⁶ cm/s). Morphine uptake was increased up to 4-fold in HEK293 cells overexpressing human OCT1. The increase was concentration-dependent and followed Michaelis-Menten kinetics (KM = 3.4 μM, VMAX = 27 pmol/min/mg protein). OCT1-mediated morphine uptake was abolished by common loss-of-function polymorphisms in the OCT1 gene and was strongly inhibited by drug-drug interactions with irinotecan, verapamil and ondansetron. Morphine uptake in primary human hepatocytes was strongly reduced by MPP⁺, an inhibitor of organic cation transporters, and morphine was not a substrate of OCT3, the other organic cation transporter expressed in human hepatocytes. In concordance with the in vitro data, morphine plasma concentrations in healthy volunteers were significantly dependent on OCT1 polymorphisms. After codeine administration, the mean AUC of morphine was 56% higher in carriers of loss-of-function OCT1 polymorphisms compared to non-carriers (P = 0.005). The difference remained significant after adjustment for CYP2D6 genotype (P = 0.03). Codeine itself had high transporter-independent membrane permeability (8.2 × 10⁻⁶ cm/s). Codeine uptake in HEK293 cells was not affected by OCT1 overexpression and OCT1 polymorphisms did not affect codeine AUCs. In conclusion, OCT1 plays an important role in the hepatocellular uptake of morphine. Carriers of loss-of-function OCT1 polymorphisms may be at higher risk of adverse effects after codeine administration, especially if they are also ultra-rapid CYP2D6 metabolizers.

Polymorphic drug-metabolizing enzymes (DMEs) are responsible for the metabolism of the majority of psychotropic drugs. By explaining a large portion of variability in individual drug metabolism, pharmacogenetics offers a diagnostic tool in the burgeoning era of personalized medicine. This review updates existing evidence on the influence of pharmacogenetic variants on drug exposure and discusses the rationale for genetic testing in the clinical context. Dose adjustments based on pharmacogenetic knowledge are the first step to translate pharmacogenetics into clinical practice. However, also clinical factors, such as the consequences on toxicity and therapeutic failure, must be considered to provide clinical recommendations and assess the cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenetic treatment strategies. DME polymorphisms are relevant not only for clinical pharmacology and practice but also for research in psychiatry and neuroscience. Several DMEs, above all the cytochrome P (CYP) enzymes, are expressed in the brain, where they may contribute to the local biochemical homeostasis. Of particular interest is the possibility of DMEs playing a physiological role through their action on endogenous substrates, which may underlie the reported associations between genetic polymorphisms and cognitive function, personality and vulnerability to mental disorders. Neuroimaging studies have recently presented evidence of an effect of the CYP2D6 polymorphism on basic brain function. This review summarizes evidence on the effect of DME polymorphisms on brain function that adds to the well-known effects of DME polymorphisms on pharmacokinetics in explaining the range of phenotypes that are relevant to psychiatric practice.