Jesse J. Swen

Dr. Jesse J. Swen

Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 March 2011 in Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Jesse J. SwenJesse J. Swen
Jesse J. Swen
MNM Nijenhuis
M Nijenhuis
ABA de Boer
A de Boer
LGL Grandia
L Grandia
Anke H. Maitland-van der ZeeAnke H. Maitland-van der Zee
Anke H. Maitland-van der Zee
HGHenk-Jan Guchelaar
Henk-Jan Guchelaar

20 November 2017 in Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
UAUrsula Amstutz
Ursula Amstutz
LHLinda M. Henricks
Linda M. Henricks
SOSteven M. Offer
Steven M. Offer
JBJulia Barbarino
Julia Barbarino
JSJan H.M. Schellens
Jan H.M. Schellens
Matthias SchwabMatthias Schwab
Matthias Schwab
The purpose of this guideline is to provide information for the interpretation of clinical dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD) genotype tests so that the results can be used to guide dosing of fluoropyrimidines (5‐fluorouracil and capecitabine). Detailed guidelines for the use of fluoropyrimidines, their clinical pharmacology, as well as analyses of cost‐effectiveness are beyond the scope of this document. The Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC®) guidelines consider the situation of patients for which genotype data are already available (updates available at https://cpicpgx.org/guidelines/guideline‐for‐fluoropyrimidines‐and‐dpyd/).

24 October 2019 in Clinical and Translational Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KCKelly E Caudle
Kelly E Caudle
KSKatrin Sangkuhl
Katrin Sangkuhl
MWMichelle Whirl‐Carrillo
Michelle Whirl‐Carrillo
Jesse J. SwenJesse J. Swen
Jesse J. Swen
CHCyrine E. Haidar
Cyrine E. Haidar
AGAndrea Gaedigk
Andrea Gaedigk
Translating CYP2D6 genotype to metabolizer phenotype is not standardized across clinical laboratories offering pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing and PGx clinical practice guidelines, such as the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) and the Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group (DPWG). The genotype to phenotype translation discordance between laboratories and guidelines can cause discordant cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) phenotype assignments and, thus lead to inconsistent therapeutic recommendations and confusion among patients and clinicians. A modified‐Delphi method was used to obtain consensus for a uniform system for translating CYP2D6 genotype to phenotype among a panel of international CYP2D6 experts. Experts with diverse involvement in CYP2D6 interpretation (clinicians, researchers, genetic testing laboratorians, and PGx implementers; n = 37) participated in conference calls and surveys. After completion of 7 surveys, a consensus (> 70%) was reached with 82% of the CYP2D6 experts agreeing to the final CYP2D6 genotype to phenotype translation method. Broad adoption of the proposed CYP2D6 genotype to phenotype translation method by guideline developers, such as CPIC and DPWG, and clinical laboratories as well as researchers will result in more consistent interpretation of CYP2D6 genotype.

31 March 2014 in Current Drug Metabolism
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KCKelly E. Caudle
Kelly E. Caudle
TKTeri E. Klein
Teri E. Klein
JHJames M. Hoffman
James M. Hoffman
DMDaniel J. Muller
Daniel J. Muller
MWMichelle Whirl-Carrillo
Michelle Whirl-Carrillo
SJSamuel G. Johnson
Samuel G. Johnson
The Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) publishes genotype-based drug guidelines to help clinicians understand how available genetic test results could be used to optimize drug therapy. CPIC has focused initially on well-known examples of pharmacogenomic associations that have been implemented in selected clinical settings, publishing nine to date. Each CPIC guideline adheres to a standardized format and includes a standard system for grading levels of evidence linking genotypes to phenotypes and assigning a level of strength to each prescribing recommendation. CPIC guidelines contain the necessary information to help clinicians translate patient-specific diplotypes for each gene into clinical phenotypes or drug dosing groups. This paper reviews the development process of the CPIC guidelines and compares this process to the Institute of Medicine’s Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines.

1 November 2018 in The Lancet Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LHLinda M. Henricks
Linda M. Henricks
CLCarin A T C Lunenburg
Carin A T C Lunenburg
FMFemke De Man
Femke De Man
DMDidier Meulendijks
Didier Meulendijks
GFGeert W J Frederix
Geert W J Frederix
JSJan H M Schellens
Jan H M Schellens

16 January 2013 in Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JHJ K Hicks
J K Hicks
Jesse J. SwenJesse J. Swen
Jesse J. Swen
CTC F Thorn
C F Thorn
KSK Sangkuhl
K Sangkuhl
EKE D Kharasch
E D Kharasch
JSJulia Carolin Stingl
Julia Carolin Stingl