Vitaly Smelov

Dr. Vitaly Smelov

World Health Organization
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 January 2014 in BMJ
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KEK Miriam Elfström
K Miriam Elfström
VSVitaly Smelov
Vitaly Smelov
AJA. L. V. Johansson
A. L. V. Johansson
CECarina Eklund
Carina Eklund
PNPontus Nauclér
Pontus Nauclér
JDJoakim Dillner
Joakim Dillner
Objectives To assess whether the increased sensitivity of screening for human papillomavirus (HPV) may represent overdiagnosis and to compare the long term duration of protective effect against cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) in HPV based and cytology based screening. Design 13 year follow-up of the Swedescreen randomised controlled trial of primary HPV screening. Setting Organised cervical screening programme in Sweden. Participants 12 527 women aged 32-38 attending organised screening were enrolled and randomised to HPV and cytology double testing (intervention arm, n=6257) or to cytology only, with samples frozen for future HPV testing (control arm, n=6270). Main outcome measures Cumulative incidence of CIN2+ and CIN3+ (Kaplan Meier curves). Longitudinal test characteristics were calculated for cytology only, HPV testing only, and cytology and HPV testing combined, adjusting for censoring. Results The increased detection of CIN2+ in the intervention arm decreased over time. After six years, the cumulative incidence of CIN3+ was similar in both trial arms, and after 11 years the cumulative incidence of CIN2+ became similar in both arms. The longitudinal sensitivity of cytology for CIN2+ in the control arm at three years was similar to the sensitivity of HPV testing in the intervention arm at five years of follow-up: 85.94% (95% confidence interval 76.85% to 91.84%) v 86.40% (79.21% to 91.37%). The sensitivity of HPV screening for CIN3+after five years was 89.34% (80.10% to 94.58%) and for cytology after three years was 92.02% (80.59% to 96.97%). Conclusions Over long term follow-up, the cumulative incidence of CIN2+ was the same for HPV screening and for cytology, implying that the increased sensitivity of HPV screening for CIN2+ reflects earlier detection rather than overdiagnosis. The low long term risks of CIN3+ among women who tested negative in HPV screening, support screening intervals of five years for such women. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00479375.

1 July 2016 in European Urology Supplements
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VSVitaly Smelov
Vitaly Smelov
KNKurt Naber
Kurt Naber
TJtruls erik Bjerklund Johansen
truls erik Bjerklund Johansen

1 March 2009 in Clinical Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HVHenry J. C. de Vries
Henry J. C. de Vries
VSVitaly Smelov
Vitaly Smelov
JMJudith G. Middelburg
Judith G. Middelburg
JPJolein Pleijster
Jolein Pleijster
ASArjen G. Speksnijder
Arjen G. Speksnijder
SMServass A. Morré
Servass A. Morré
Microbial cure of chlamydia proctitis (lymphogranuloma venereum [LGV] and non-LGV) with doxycycline treatment was evaluated by chlamydia DNA and RNA

19 July 2014 in International Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VSVitaly Smelov
Vitaly Smelov
KEK. Miriam Elfström
K. Miriam Elfström
AJAnna L.V. Johansson
Anna L.V. Johansson
CECarina Eklund
Carina Eklund
PNPontus Naucler
Pontus Naucler
JDJoakim Dillner
Joakim Dillner
Quantitative knowledge of the long‐term human papillomavirus (HPV) type‐specific risks for high‐grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasias Grades 2 and 3 (CIN2 and CIN3) is useful for estimating the effect of elimination of specific HPV types and clinical benefits of screening for specific HPV types. We estimated HPV type‐specific risks for CIN2 and CIN3 using a randomized primary HPV screening trial followed up for 14.6 years using comprehensive, nationwide registers. Poisson regression estimated cumulative incidences, population attributable proportions (PAR) and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of high‐grade lesions by baseline HPV type, with censoring at date of first CIN2/3 or last registered cytology. Multivariate analysis adjusted for coinfections. IRRs were highest during the first screening round, but continued to be high throughout follow‐up (IRRs for CIN3 associated with high‐risk (HR) HPV positivity were 226.9, 49.3, 17.7 and 10.3 during the first, second and third screening round and for >9 years of follow‐up, respectively). Increased long‐term risks were found particularly for HPV Types 16, 18 and 31 and for CIN3+ risks. HPV16/18/31/33 had 14‐year cumulative incidences for CIN3+ above 28%, HPV35/45/52/58 had 14 year risks between 14% and 18% and HPV39/51/56/59/66/68 had risks <10%. HPV16 contributed to the greatest proportion of CIN2+ (first round PAR 36%), followed by Types 31, 52, 45 and 58 (7–11%). HPV16/18/31/33/45/52/58 together contributed 73.9% of CIN2+ lesions and all HR types contributed 86.9%. In summary, we found substantial differences in risks for CIN2 and CIN3 between different oncogenic HPV types. These differences may be relevant for both clinical management and design of preventive strategies.

1 July 2015 in Journal of Infection
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Maria Gabriella DonàMaria Gabriella Donà
Maria Gabriella Donà
TGTarik Gheit
Tarik Gheit
Alessandra LatiniAlessandra Latini
Alessandra Latini
MBMaria Benevolo
Maria Benevolo
MTMontserrat Torres
Montserrat Torres
Massimo GiulianiMassimo Giuliani
Massimo Giuliani

1 October 2013 in Journal of Clinical Virology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LMLaila Sara för Arroyo Mühr
Laila Sara för Arroyo Mühr
VSVitaly Smelov
Vitaly Smelov
DBDavit Bzhalava
Davit Bzhalava
CECarina Eklund
Carina Eklund
EHEmilie Hultin
Emilie Hultin
JDJoakim Dillner
Joakim Dillner