truls erik Bjerklund Johansen

Prof. truls erik Bjerklund Johansen

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

40Years (1987-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2001 in European Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KNKurt G. Naber
Kurt G. Naber
BBBo Bergman
Bo Bergman
MBMichael C. Bishop
Michael C. Bishop
TJtruls erik Bjerklund Johansen
truls erik Bjerklund Johansen
HBHenry Botto
Henry Botto
FSFrancesco P. Selvaggi
Francesco P. Selvaggi

1 March 2013 in European Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FWFlorian Wagenlehner
Florian Wagenlehner
EOEdgar van Oostrum
Edgar van Oostrum
PTPeter Tenke
Peter Tenke
ZTZafer Tandogdu
Zafer Tandogdu
MÇMete Çek
Mete Çek
TJtruls erik Bjerklund Johansen
truls erik Bjerklund Johansen

1 February 2008 in International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PTPeter Tenke
Peter Tenke
BKBela Kovacs
Bela Kovacs
TJtruls erik Bjerklund Johansen
truls erik Bjerklund Johansen
TMTetsuro Matsumoto
Tetsuro Matsumoto
PTPaul A. Tambyah
Paul A. Tambyah
KNKurt G. Naber
Kurt G. Naber

1 February 2014 in Cryobiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJ.G. Baust
J.G. Baust
AGA.A. Gage
A.A. Gage
TJtruls erik Bjerklund Johansen
truls erik Bjerklund Johansen
JBJ.M. Baust
J.M. Baust

1 December 2011 in International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TJtruls erik Bjerklund Johansen
truls erik Bjerklund Johansen
HBHenry Botto
Henry Botto
MCMete Cek
Mete Cek
MGMagnus Grabe
Magnus Grabe
PTPeter Tenke
Peter Tenke
KNKurt G. Naber
Kurt G. Naber

1 May 2010 in Journal of Endourology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JRJean de la Rosette
Jean de la Rosette
HAH. Ahmed
H. Ahmed
JBJ. Barentsz
J. Barentsz
TJtruls erik Bjerklund Johansen
truls erik Bjerklund Johansen
MBM. Brausi
M. Brausi
TPT. Polascik
T. Polascik
Purpose: To establish a consensus in relation to case selection, conduct of therapy, and outcomes that are associated with focal therapy for men with localized prostate cancer. Material and Methods: Urologic surgeons, radiation oncologists, radiologists, and histopathologists from North America and Europe participated in a consensus workshop on focal therapy for prostate cancer. The consensus process was face to face within a structured meeting, in which pertinent clinical issues were raised, discussed, and agreement sought. Where no agreement was possible, this was acknowledged, and the nature of the disagreement noted. Results: Candidates for focal treatment should have unilateral low- to intermediate-risk disease with clinical stage ≤cT2a. Prostate size and both tumor volume and tumor topography are important case selection criteria that depend on the ablative technology used. Currently, the best method to ascertain the key characteristics for men who are considering focal therapy is exposure to transperineal template mapping biopsies. MRI of the prostate using novel techniques such as dynamic contrast enhancement and diffusion weighed imaging are increasingly being used to diagnose and stage primary prostate cancer with excellent results. For general use, however, these new techniques require validation in prospective clinical trials. Until such are performed, MRI will, in most centers, continue to be an investigative tool in assessing eligibility of patients for focal therapy. Conclusions: Consensus was derived for most of the key aspects of case selection, conduct of treatment, and outcome measures for men who are undergoing focal therapy for localized prostate cancer. The level of agreement achieved will pave the way for future collaborative trials.