The immunosensor has been proven a versatile tool to detect various analytes, such as food contaminants, pathogenic bacteria, antibiotics and biomarkers related to cancer. To fabricate robust and reproducible immunosensors with high sensitivity, the covalent immobilization of immunoglobulins (IgGs) in a site-specific manner contributes to better performance. Instead of the random IgG orientations result from the direct yet non-selective immobilization techniques, this review for the first time introduces the advances of stepwise yet site-selective conjugation strategies to give better biosensing efficiency. Noncovalently adsorbing IgGs is the first but decisive step to interact specifically with the Fc fragment, then following covalent conjugate can fix this uniform and antigens-favorable orientation irreversibly. In this review, we first categorized this stepwise strategy into two parts based on the different noncovalent interactions, namely adhesive layer-mediated interaction onto homofunctional support and layer-free interaction onto heterofunctional support (which displays several different functionalities on its surface that are capable to interact with IgGs). Further, the influence of ligands characteristics (synthesis strategies, spacer requirements and matrices selection) on the heterofunctional support has also been discussed. Finally, conclusions and future perspectives for the real-world application of stepwise covalent conjugation are discussed. This review provides more insights into the fabrication of high-efficiency immunosensor, and special attention has been devoted to the well-orientation of full-length IgGs onto the sensing platform.

Sepabeads‐EP (a new epoxy support) has been utilized to immobilize‐stabilize the enzyme penicillin G acylase (PGA) via multipoint covalent attachment. These supports are very robust and suitable for industrial purposes. Also, the internal geometry of the support is composed by cylindrical pores surrounded by the convex surfaces (this offers a good geometrical congruence for reaction with the enzyme), and it has a very high superficial density of epoxy groups (around 100 μmol/mL). These features should permit a very intense enzyme‐support interaction. However, the final stability of the immobilized enzyme is strictly dependent on the immobilization protocol. By using conventional immobilization protocols (neutral pH values, nonblockage of the support) the stability of the immobilized enzyme was quite similar to that achieved using Eupergit C to immobilize the PGA. However, when using a more sophisticated three‐step immobilization/stabilization/blockage procedure, the Sepabeads derivative was hundreds‐fold more stable than Eupergit C derivatives. The protocol used was as follows: (i) the enzyme was first covalently immobilized under very mild experimental conditions (e.g., pH 7.0 and 20 °C); (ii) the already immobilized enzyme was further incubated under more drastic conditions (higher pH values, long incubation periods, etc.) in order to “facilitate” the formation of new covalent linkages between the immobilized enzyme molecule and the support; (iii) the remaining epoxy groups of the support were blocked with very hydrophilic compounds to stop any additional interaction between the enzyme and the support. This third point was found to be critical for obtaining very stable enzymes: derivatives blocked with mercaptoethanol were much less stable than derivatives blocked with glycine or other amino acids. This was attributed to the better masking of the hydrophobicity of the support by the amino acids (having two charges).

Multipoint covalent immobilization of enzymes (through very short spacer arms) on support surfaces promotes a very interesting ‘rigidification’ of protein molecules. In this case, the relative positions of each residue of the enzyme involved in the immobilization process have to be preserved unchanged during any conformational change induced on the immobilized enzyme by any distorting agent (heat, organic solvents etc.). In this way, multipoint covalent immobilization should induce a very strong stabilization of immobilized enzymes. Epoxy-activated supports are able to chemically react with all nucleophile groups placed on the protein surface: lysine, histidine, cysteine, tyrosine etc. Besides, epoxy groups are very stable. This allows the performance of very long enzyme–support reactions, enabling us to get very intense multipoint covalent attachment. In this way, these epoxy supports seem to be very suitable to stabilize industrial enzymes by multipoint covalent attachment. However, epoxy groups exhibit a low intermolecular reactivity towards nucleophiles and hence the enzymes are not able to directly react with the epoxy supports. Thus a rapid physical adsorption of enzymes on the supports becomes a first step, followed by an additional rapid ‘intramolecular’ reaction between the already adsorbed enzyme and the activated support. In this situation, a suitable first orientation of the enzyme on the support (e.g. through regions that are very rich in nucleophiles) is obviously necessary to get a very intense additional multipoint covalent immobilization. The preparation of different ‘generations’ of epoxy supports and the design of different protocols to fully control the first interaction between enzymes and epoxy supports will be reviewed in this paper. Finally, the possibilities of a directed immobilization of mutated enzymes (change of an amino acid by cysteine on specific points of the protein surface) on tailor-made disulfide-epoxy supports will be discussed as an almost-ideal procedure to achieve very intense and very efficient rigidification of a desired region of industrial enzymes.