Emmanuel Kidando

Dr. Emmanuel Kidando


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
10 November 2022 in Journal of Safety Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NNNorris Novat
Norris Novat
EKEmmanuel Kidando
Emmanuel Kidando
BKBoniphace Kutela
Boniphace Kutela
AKAngela E. Kitali
Angela E. Kitali

1 October 2018 in Accident Analysis & Prevention
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AKAngela Kitali
Angela Kitali
PAPriyanka Alluri
Priyanka Alluri
TSThobias Sando
Thobias Sando
HHHenrick Haule
Henrick Haule
EKEmmanuel Kidando
Emmanuel Kidando
RLRichard Lentz
Richard Lentz

1 January 2021 in Accident Analysis & Prevention
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EKEmmanuel Kidando
Emmanuel Kidando
AKAngela Kitali
Angela Kitali
BKBoniphace Kutela
Boniphace Kutela
MGMahyar Ghorbanzadeh
Mahyar Ghorbanzadeh
AKAlican Karaer
Alican Karaer
TSThobias Sando
Thobias Sando

1 February 2022 in Journal of Safety Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LLLuciano Lalika
Luciano Lalika
AKAngela Kitali
Angela Kitali
HHHenrick J. Haule
Henrick J. Haule
EKEmmanuel Kidando
Emmanuel Kidando
TSThobias Sando
Thobias Sando
PAPriyanka Alluri
Priyanka Alluri

14 March 2020 in Journal of Transportation Safety & Security
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AKAngela Kitali
Angela Kitali
EKEmmanuel Kidando
Emmanuel Kidando
PAPriyanka Alluri
Priyanka Alluri
TSThobias Sando
Thobias Sando
JSJimoku Hinda Salum
Jimoku Hinda Salum
Motorcycles are becoming increasingly popular, especially in developing countries. This increasing exposure, combined with the fact that they most likely result in injury crashes, necessitates new strategies to reduce the severity of crashes involving motorcycles. This study focused on analyzing the factors affecting the injury severity of crashes involving motorcycles in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. A Bayesian Multinomial Logit Model with a Dirichlet random effect parameter was used to analyze four years (2013–2016) of crash data. The main benefit of this model is that it accounts for the groups of unobserved heterogeneity that exists in the data. The response variable is injury severity with three categories: fatal/severe injury, minor injury, and possible/no injury. The potential variables affecting motorcycle crashes were grouped into four categories: human, environment, roadway, and crash. Relative risk ratios and average pseudoelasticity were obtained to identify the factors influencing the severity of motorcycles crashes. The model results suggested that the following factors increase the probability of fatal/severe injury crashes: speeding, violations, head-on collisions, weekend, and off-peak hours. Several countermeasures were recommended based on the study findings. These countermeasures propose holistic safety improvement strategies encompassing the three E’s of highway safety, namely Engineering, Education, and Enforcement.

1 April 2019 in Transportation Planning and Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EKEmmanuel Kidando
Emmanuel Kidando
RMRen Moses
Ren Moses
TSThobias Sando
Thobias Sando
EOEren E. Ozguven
Eren E. Ozguven
Significant efforts have been made in modeling a travel time distribution and establishing measures of travel time reliability (TTR). However, the literature on evaluating the factors affecting TTR is not well established. Accordingly, this paper presents an empirical analysis to determine potential factors that are associated with TTR. This study mainly applies the Bayesian Networks model to assess the probabilistic association between road geometry, traffic data, and TTR. The results from this model reveal that land use characteristics, intersection factors, and posted speed limits are directly associated with TTR. Evaluating the strength of the association between TTR and the directly related variables, the log odds ratio analysis indicates that the land use factor has the highest impact (0.83) followed by the intersection factor (0.57). The findings from this study can provide valuable resources to planners and traffic operators in their decision-making to improve TTR with quantitative evidence.