Jennifer M. Young

Dr. Jennifer M. Young


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 March 2019 in Molecular Ecology Resources
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LWLaura S Weyrich
Laura S Weyrich
AFAndrew G. Farrer
Andrew G. Farrer
RERaphael Eisenhofer
Raphael Eisenhofer
LALuis A. Arriola
Luis A. Arriola
JYJennifer M. Young
Jennifer M. Young
ACAlan Cooper
Alan Cooper
Bacteria are not only ubiquitous on earth but can also be incredibly diverse within clean laboratories and reagents. The presence of both living and dead bacteria in laboratory environments and reagents is especially problematic when examining samples with low endogenous content (e.g., skin swabs, tissue biopsies, ice, water, degraded forensic samples or ancient material), where contaminants can outnumber endogenous microorganisms within samples. The contribution of contaminants within high‐throughput studies remains poorly understood because of the relatively low number of contaminant surveys. Here, we examined 144 negative control samples (extraction blank and no‐template amplification controls) collected in both typical molecular laboratories and an ultraclean ancient DNA laboratory over 5 years to characterize long‐term contaminant diversity. We additionally compared the contaminant content within a home‐made silica‐based extraction method, commonly used to analyse low endogenous content samples, with a widely used commercial DNA extraction kit. The contaminant taxonomic profile of the ultraclean ancient DNA laboratory was unique compared to modern molecular biology laboratories, and changed over time according to researcher, month and season. The commercial kit also contained higher microbial diversity and several human‐associated taxa in comparison to the home‐made silica extraction protocol. We recommend a minimum of two strategies to reduce the impacts of laboratory contaminants within low‐biomass metagenomic studies: (a) extraction blank controls should be included and sequenced with every batch of extractions and (b) the contributions of laboratory contamination should be assessed and reported in each high‐throughput metagenomic study.

1 January 2020 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CLCraig Liddicoat
Craig Liddicoat
HSHarrison Sydnor
Harrison Sydnor
CCChristian Cando-Dumancela
Christian Cando-Dumancela
RDRomy Dresken
Romy Dresken
JLJiajun Liu
Jiajun Liu
MBMartin Breed
Martin Breed

15 October 2014 in Journal of Quaternary Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NRNicolas J. Rawlence
Nicolas J. Rawlence
David LoweDavid Lowe
David Lowe
JWJamie Wood
Jamie Wood
JYJennifer M. Young
Jennifer M. Young
GCG. Jock Churchman
G. Jock Churchman
ACAlan Cooper
Alan Cooper
Palaeoenvironmental DNA (PalEnDNA) is defined as ancient DNA (aDNA) originating from disseminated genetic material within palaeoenvironmental samples. Sources of PalEnDNA include marine and lake sediments, peat, loess, till, ice, permafrost, palaeosols, coprolites, preserved gut contents, dental calculus, tephras, and soils as well as deposits in caves/rockshelters and at archaeological sites. PalEnDNA analysis provides a relatively new tool for Quaternary and archaeological sciences and its applications have included palaeoenvironmental and palaeodietary reconstructions, testing hypotheses regarding megafaunal extinctions, human–environment interactions, taxonomic studies, and studies of DNA damage. Because PalEnDNA samples comprise markedly different materials, and represent wide‐ranging depositional and taphonomic contexts, various issues must be addressed to achieve robust, reproducible findings. Such issues include climatic and temporal limitations, the biological origin and state (free versus bound) of PalEnDNA, stratigraphic reliability, sterile sampling, ability to distinguish modern from aDNA signals, DNA damage and PCR amplification, DNA extraction methods, and taxonomic resolution. In this review, we provide a non‐specialist introduction to the use of PalEnDNA for Quaternary and archaeological researchers, assess attributes and limitations of this palaeoenvironmental tool, and discuss future prospects of using PalEnDNA to reconstruct past environments.

11 February 2020 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CTChris S. M. Turney
Chris S. M. Turney
CFChristopher Fogwill
Christopher Fogwill
NGNicholas R. Golledge
Nicholas R. Golledge
NMNicholas P. McKay
Nicholas P. McKay
ESErik van Sebille
Erik van Sebille
ACAlan Cooper
Alan Cooper
The future response of the Antarctic ice sheet to rising temperatures remains highly uncertain. A useful period for assessing the sensitivity of Antarctica to warming is the Last Interglacial (LIG) (129 to 116 ky), which experienced warmer polar temperatures and higher global mean sea level (GMSL) (+6 to 9 m) relative to present day. LIG sea level cannot be fully explained by Greenland Ice Sheet melt (∼2 m), ocean thermal expansion, and melting mountain glaciers (∼1 m), suggesting substantial Antarctic mass loss was initiated by warming of Southern Ocean waters, resulting from a weakening Atlantic meridional overturning circulation in response to North Atlantic surface freshening. Here, we report a blue-ice record of ice sheet and environmental change from the Weddell Sea Embayment at the periphery of the marine-based West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS), which is underlain by major methane hydrate reserves. Constrained by a widespread volcanic horizon and supported by ancient microbial DNA analyses, we provide evidence for substantial mass loss across the Weddell Sea Embayment during the LIG, most likely driven by ocean warming and associated with destabilization of subglacial hydrates. Ice sheet modeling supports this interpretation and suggests that millennial-scale warming of the Southern Ocean could have triggered a multimeter rise in global sea levels. Our data indicate that Antarctica is highly vulnerable to projected increases in ocean temperatures and may drive ice–climate feedbacks that further amplify warming.

1 May 2014 in Science & Justice
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JYJennifer M. Young
Jennifer M. Young
NRNicolas J. Rawlence
Nicolas J. Rawlence
LWLaura S Weyrich
Laura S Weyrich
ACAlan Cooper
Alan Cooper

1 September 2019 in Earth-Science Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LALinda H. Armbrecht
Linda H. Armbrecht
Marco CoolenMarco Coolen
Marco Coolen
FLFranck Lejzerowicz
Franck Lejzerowicz
Simon GeorgeSimon George
Simon George
KNKarita Negandhi
Karita Negandhi
LWLaura S. Weyrich
Laura S. Weyrich