Metal additive manufacturing (AM) allows obtaining functional parts with the possibility of optimizing them topologically without affecting system performance. This is of great interest for sectors such as aerospace, automotive, and medical–surgical. However, from a metrological point of view, the high requirements applied in these sectors constitute a challenge for inspecting these types of parts. Non-contact inspection has gained great relevance due to the rapid verification of AM parts. Optical measurement systems (OMSs) are being increasingly adopted for geometric dimensioning and tolerancing (GD&T) verification within the context of Industry 4.0. In this paper, the suitability (advantages and limitations) of five different OMSs (based on laser triangulation, conoscopic holography, and structured light techniques) for GD&T verification of parts manufactured by selective laser melting (SLM) is analyzed. For this purpose, a specific testing part was designed and SLM-manufactured in 17-4PH stainless steel. Once the part was measured by contact (obtaining the reference GD&T values), it was optically measured. The scanning results allow comparing the OMSs in terms of their inspection speed as well as dimensional and geometrical accuracy. As a result, two portable systems (handheld laser triangulation and structured blue-light scanners) were identified as the most accurate optical techniques for scanning SLM parts.

Additive Manufacturing (AM) is advancing technologically towards the production of components for high-demand mechanical applications with stringent dimensional accuracy, leveraging metallic and ceramic raw materials. The AM process for ceramic components, known as Ultraviolet Laser Stereolithography (SLA), enables the fabrication of unique parts or small batches without substantial investments in molds and dies, and avoids the problems associated with traditional manufacturing, which involves multiple stages and final machining for precision. This study addresses the need to produce reference elements or targets for metrological applications, including verification, adjustment, or calibration of 3D scanners and mid- to high-range optical sensors. Precision spheres are a primary geometry in this context due to their straightforward mathematical definition, facilitating rapid and accurate error detection in equipment. Our objective is to exploit this novel SLA process along with the advantageous optical properties of technical ceramics (such as being white, matte, lightweight, and corrosion-resistant) to materialize these reference objects. Specifically, this work involves the fabrication of alumina hemispheres using SLA. The manufacturing process incorporates four design variables (wall thickness, support shape, fill type, and orientation) and one manufacturing variable (the arrangement of spheres on the printing tray). To evaluate the impact of the design variables, dimensional and geometric parameters (GD&T), including diameters, form errors, and their distribution on the surface of the sphere, have been characterized. These measurements are conducted with high accuracy using a Coordinate Measuring Machine (CMM). The study also examines the influence of these variables in the dimensional and geometric accuracy of the spheres. Correlations between various parameters were identified, specifically highlighting critical factors affecting process precision, such as the position of the piece on the print tray and the wall thickness value. The smallest diameter errors were recorded at the outermost positions of the tray (rear and front), while the smallest shape errors were found at the central position, in both cases with errors in the range of tens of micrometers. In any case, the smallest deformations were observed with the highest wall thickness (2 mm).

Purpose: The lack of geometric and dimensional accuracy of parts produced by additive manufacturing (AM) is directly related to the machine, material and process used. This paper aims to propose a method for the analysis and compensation of machine-related geometric errors applicable to any AM machine, regardless of the manufacturing process and technology used. Design/methodology/approach: For this purpose, an error calculation model inspired by those used in computerized numerical control machines and coordinate measuring machines was developed. The error functions of the model were determined from the position deviations of a set of virtual points that are not sensitive to material and process errors. These points were obtained from the measurement of an ad hoc designed and manufactured master artefact. To validate the model, off-line compensation was applied to both the original designed artefact and an example part. Findings: The geometric deviations in both cases were significantly smaller than those found before applying the geometric compensation. Dimensional enhancements were also achieved on the example part by using a correction parameter available in the three-dimensional printing software, whose value was adjusted from the measurement of the geometrically compensated master artefact. Research limitations/implications: The errors that persist in the part derive from both material and process. Compensation for these type of errors requires a detailed analysis of the influencing parameters, which will be the subject of future research. Originality/value: The use of the virtual-point-based error model increases the quality of additively manufactured parts and can be used in any AM system.

The use of non-contact scanning equipment in metrology and in dimensional and geometric inspection applications is increasing due to its ease of use, the speed and density of scans, and the current costs. In fact, these technologies are becoming increasingly dominant in the industrial environment, thus moving from reverse engineering applications to metrological applications. However, this planned transfer requires actions to ensure the achievable accuracy by providing traceability of measurements. In the present study, a comparison between the devices is carried out and a specific standard artefact is designed, equipped with multiple ceramic optically friendly entities, and allowing a wide variety of geometric dimensioning and tolerancing (GD&T). Four different 3D scanning sensors are used in the experimentation. Three of them are based on laser triangulation, and the fourth is a structured blue light sensor (fringe pattern projection). The standard artefact is calibrated with a high accuracy, using a coordinate measuring machine (CMM) and probing sensors. With this CMM, reference values of multiple predefined GD&T are obtained. The evaluation methodology maximises the accuracy of each device in measuring the dimensions of the artefact due to the good dimensional (milling and turning), surface (control of machining variables), and the dimensional and spatial distribution characteristics. The procedure also includes the same treatment of the captured point clouds (trimming, filtering, and best-fit algorithm, etc.) in each of the four 3D scanning sensors considered. From this process, very reliable measurements of the maximum achievable accuracy of each device (deviations from the CMM measurements) are finally obtained, and a multi-characteristic comparison between the four sensors is performed, also with high reliability.

Resumen: La metodología BIM (Building Information Modelling) está, cada día, acercándose más y más a empresas y otros participantes del sector AEC (Architecture, Engineering and Construction), así como a los centros educativos que empiezan a formar nuevos profesionales en esta materia. La hoja de ruta marcada por la Comisión esBIM establece la obligatoriedad del uso del BIM para toda licitación pública en la Edificación para el 17 de diciembre de 2018 y para el 26 de julio de 2019 en el caso de las Infraestructuras. El objetivo de este artículo es hacer público y compartir los resultados del trabajo de investigación sobre el estado de implantación del BIM en las diferentes universidades y escuelas de Ingeniería Industrial del territorio español. Pero, ¿están las universidades en España preparadas para este reto? ¿Está el profesorado preparado para ello? ¿Y en Latinoamérica? El estudio se realizó a través de la consulta y análisis bibliográfico de publicaciones sobre la materia y comunicaciones en congresos especializados. Se han analizado y comparado diversas experiencias docentes en varias universidades españolas y se han tenido en cuenta las problemáticas encontradas, los resultados obtenidos y las futuras mejoras y necesidades detectadas en sus procesos y procedimientos de implantación.