Marco Domingos

Dr. Marco Domingos

University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2012 in Progress in Polymer Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Ferry MelchelsFerry Melchels
Ferry Melchels
Marco DomingosMarco Domingos
Marco Domingos
TKTravis Klein
Travis Klein
JMJos Malda
Jos Malda
Paulo BartoloPaulo Bartolo
Paulo Bartolo
Dietmar Werner HutmacherDietmar Werner Hutmacher
Dietmar Werner Hutmacher

25 July 2019 in Advanced Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
WYWenji Yang
Wenji Yang
JYJie Yang
Jie Yang
JBJae Jong Byun
Jae Jong Byun
FMFrancis P. Moissinac
Francis P. Moissinac
JXJiaqi Xu
Jiaqi Xu
SBSuelen Barg
Suelen Barg

1 April 2013 in Acta Biomaterialia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Marco DomingosMarco Domingos
Marco Domingos
FIF. Intranuovo
F. Intranuovo
AGA. Gloria
A. Gloria
RGRoberto Gristina
Roberto Gristina
LALuigi Ambrosio
Luigi Ambrosio
PFPietro Favia
Pietro Favia

1 January 2013 in Procedia CIRP
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Tatiana Marisa Fernandes PatrícioTatiana Marisa Fernandes Patrício
Tatiana Marisa Fernandes Patrício
Marco DomingosMarco Domingos
Marco Domingos
AGA. Gloria
A. Gloria
Paulo BartoloPaulo Bartolo
Paulo Bartolo

6 November 2013 in Biofabrication
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Marco DomingosMarco Domingos
Marco Domingos
FIF Intranuovo
F Intranuovo
Teresa RussoTeresa Russo
Teresa Russo
RSR De Santis
R De Santis
AGA Gloria
A Gloria
Paulo BartoloPaulo Bartolo
Paulo Bartolo
Novel additive manufacturing processes are increasingly recognized as ideal techniques to produce 3D biodegradable structures with optimal pore size and spatial distribution, providing an adequate mechanical support for tissue regeneration while shaping in-growing tissues. With regard to the mechanical and biological performances of 3D scaffolds, pore size and geometry play a crucial role. In this study, a novel integrated automated system for the production and in vitro culture of 3D constructs, known as BioCell Printing, was used only to manufacture poly(ε-caprolactone) scaffolds for tissue engineering; the influence of pore size and shape on their mechanical and biological performances was investigated. Imposing a single lay-down pattern of 0°/90° and varying the filament distance, it was possible to produce scaffolds with square interconnected pores with channel sizes falling in the range of 245-433 µm, porosity 49-57% and a constant road width. Three different lay-down patterns were also adopted (0°/90°, 0°/60/120° and 0°/45°/90°/135°), thus resulting in scaffolds with quadrangular, triangular and complex internal geometries, respectively. Mechanical compression tests revealed a decrease of scaffold stiffness with the increasing porosity and number of deposition angles (from 0°/90° to 0°/45°/90°/135°). Results from biological analysis, carried out using human mesenchymal stem cells, suggest a strong influence of pore size and geometry on cell viability. On the other hand, after 21 days of in vitro static culture, it was not possible to detect any significant variation in terms of cell morphology promoted by scaffold topology. As a first systematic analysis, the obtained results clearly demonstrate the potential of the BioCell Printing process to produce 3D scaffolds with reproducible well organized architectures and tailored mechanical properties.

16 September 2020 in Chemical Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Ana C. FonsecaAna C. Fonseca
Ana C. Fonseca
Ferry MelchelsFerry Melchels
Ferry Melchels
MFMiguel J. S. Ferreira
Miguel J. S. Ferreira
Samuel MoxonSamuel Moxon
Samuel Moxon
GPGeoffrey Potjewyd
Geoffrey Potjewyd
Marco DomingosMarco Domingos
Marco Domingos
The lack of in vitro tissue and organ models capable of mimicking human physiology severely hinders the development and clinical translation of therapies and drugs with higher in vivo efficacy. Bioprinting allow us to fill this gap and generate 3D tissue analogues with complex functional and structural organization through the precise spatial positioning of multiple materials and cells. In this review, we report the latest developments in terms of bioprinting technologies for the manufacturing of cellular constructs with particular emphasis on material extrusion, jetting, and vat photopolymerization. We then describe the different base polymers employed in the formulation of bioinks for bioprinting and examine the strategies used to tailor their properties according to both processability and tissue maturation requirements. By relating function to organization in human development, we examine the potential of pluripotent stem cells in the context of bioprinting toward a new generation of tissue models for personalized medicine. We also highlight the most relevant attempts to engineer artificial models for the study of human organogenesis, disease, and drug screening. Finally, we discuss the most pressing challenges, opportunities, and future prospects in the field of bioprinting for tissue engineering (TE) and regenerative medicine (RM).