Travis Klein

Dr. Travis Klein

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2012 in Progress in Polymer Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Ferry MelchelsFerry Melchels
Ferry Melchels
Marco DomingosMarco Domingos
Marco Domingos
TKTravis Klein
Travis Klein
JMJos Malda
Jos Malda
Paulo BartoloPaulo Bartolo
Paulo Bartolo
Dietmar Werner HutmacherDietmar Werner Hutmacher
Dietmar Werner Hutmacher

17 March 2016 in Nature Protocols
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Daniela LoessnerDaniela Loessner
Daniela Loessner
CMChristoph Meinert
Christoph Meinert
EKElke Kaemmerer
Elke Kaemmerer
LMLaure C Martine
Laure C Martine
KYKan Yue
Kan Yue
Dietmar Werner HutmacherDietmar Werner Hutmacher
Dietmar Werner Hutmacher

18 February 2013 in Macromolecular Bioscience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
WSWouter Schuurman
Wouter Schuurman
PLPeter A. Levett
Peter A. Levett
MPMichiel W. Pot
Michiel W. Pot
PWPaul René van Weeren
Paul René van Weeren
WDWouter J. A. Dhert
Wouter J. A. Dhert
JMJos Malda
Jos Malda

1 July 2016 in Materials Today
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ZCZetao Chen
Zetao Chen
TKTravis Klein
Travis Klein
RMRachael Z. Murray
Rachael Z. Murray
RCRoss Crawford
Ross Crawford
JCJiang Chang
Jiang Chang
Yin XiaoYin Xiao
Yin Xiao
As direct effector cells for osteogenesis, osteoblastic cells are commonly used for evaluating the in vitro osteogenic capacity of bone biomaterials, and the traditional biological principle for developing bone biomaterials is to directly stimulate osteogenic differentiation. With this principle, most efforts are currently spent on optimizing the bio-mechanical and physicochemical properties to induce osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. This strategy has achieved certain success in the development of bone biomaterials; however, inconsistencies between in vitro and in vivo studies are not uncommon, implying the mechanisms that govern the material's capacity to mediate osteogenesis is not well-understood. Osteoimmunology has revealed the vital role of immune cells in regulating bone dynamics. Neglecting the importance of the immune response is a major shortcoming of the traditional strategy, and may explain inconsistencies between in vitro and in vivo conditions. Here, we proposed osteoimmunomodulation (OIM) in recognition of the importance of the immune response during biomaterial-mediated osteogenesis. Accordingly, we proposed the paradigm shift of bone biomaterials to an osteoimmunomodulatory material and discussed the evaluation strategy for the osteoimmunomodulation property of bone biomaterials. It is the ambition of authors that this review will change traditional methods for bone biomaterials assessment and assist in developing new bone biomaterials with the osteoimmunomodulatory property for orthopedic and dental applications

1 January 2014 in Acta Biomaterialia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PLPeter A. Levett
Peter A. Levett
Ferry MelchelsFerry Melchels
Ferry Melchels
KSKarsten Schrobback
Karsten Schrobback
Dietmar Werner HutmacherDietmar Werner Hutmacher
Dietmar Werner Hutmacher
JMJos Malda
Jos Malda
TKTravis Klein
Travis Klein

1 February 2014 in Biomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZCZetao Chen
Zetao Chen
CWChengtie Wu
Chengtie Wu
WGWenyi Gu
Wenyi Gu
TKTravis Klein
Travis Klein
RCRoss Crawford
Ross Crawford
Yin XiaoYin Xiao
Yin Xiao