Magnus Bengtsson

Magnus Bengtsson


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2011 in Waste Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
OTOyuna Tsydenova
Oyuna Tsydenova
MBMagnus Bengtsson
Magnus Bengtsson

25 May 2018 in Sustainability Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMagnus Bengtsson
Magnus Bengtsson
Eva AlfredssonEva Alfredsson
Eva Alfredsson
MCMaurie Cohen
Maurie Cohen
SLSylvia Lorek
Sylvia Lorek
PSPatrick Schroeder
Patrick Schroeder
The United Nations formulated the sustainable development goals (SDGs) in 2015 as a comprehensive global policy framework for addressing the most pressing social and environmental challenges currently facing humanity. In this paper, we analyse SDG 12, which aims to “ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns.” Despite long-standing political recognition of this objective, and ample scientific evidence both on its importance and on the efficacy of various ways of promoting it, the SDGs do not provide clear goals or effective guidance on how to accomplish this urgently needed transformation. Drawing from the growing body of research on sustainable consumption and production (SCP), the paper identifies two dominant vantage points—one focused on promoting more efficient production methods and products (mainly through technological improvement and informed consumer choice) and the other stressing the need to consider also overall volumes of consumption, distributional issues, and related social and institutional changes. We label these two approaches efficiency and systemic. Research shows that while the efficiency approach contains essential elements of a transition to sustainability, it is by itself highly unlikely to bring about sustainable outcomes. Concomitantly, research also finds that volumes of consumption and production are closely associated with environmental impacts, indicating a need to curtail these volumes in ways that safeguard social sustainability, which is unlikely to be possible without a restructuring of existing socioeconomic arrangements. Analysing how these two perspectives are reflected in the SDGs framework, we find that in its current conception, it mainly relies on the efficiency approach. On the basis of this assessment, we conclude that the SDGs represent a partial and inadequate conceptualisation of SCP which will hamper implementation. Based on this determination, this paper provides some suggestions on how governments and other actors involved in SDGs operationalisation could more effectively pursue SCP from a systemic standpoint and use the transformation of systems of consumption and production as a lever for achieving multiple sustainability objectives.

2 December 1999 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MLMargareta Lundin
Margareta Lundin
MBMagnus Bengtsson
Magnus Bengtsson
Sverker MolanderSverker Molander
Sverker Molander

1 July 2019 in Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PSPatrick Schröder
Patrick Schröder
MBMagnus Bengtsson
Magnus Bengtsson
MCMaurie Cohen
Maurie Cohen
PDPaul Dewick
Paul Dewick
JHJoerg Hofstetter
Joerg Hofstetter
JSJoseph Sarkis
Joseph Sarkis

24 January 2014 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Lewis AkenjiLewis Akenji
Lewis Akenji
MBMagnus Bengtsson
Magnus Bengtsson
This paper argues that sustainable consumption and production (SCP) should play a prominent role in the formulation and implementation of the sustainable development goals (SDGs) and discusses how this could be practically done. Unsustainable patterns of consumption and production have been declared the primary cause of environmental deterioration. This was clearly recognized already at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (or the Rio Summit) in 1992; and this recognition has been reconfirmed in all high-level sustainability meetings since then. SCP aims to change these patterns; it is a policy agenda for addressing the root causes of our ecological predicament, while, at the same time, providing for human wellbeing and prosperity. Drawing from international agreements, practical policy experience and research from a range of disciplines, the paper provides a clarifying framework for scientifically robust, policy-relevant and practical goal-setting for SCP within the SDGs. Special attention is given to how SCP in the SDGs can create synergies with other international policy initiatives. The paper explores the advantages and disadvantages of two possible options for reflecting SCP in the SDGs framework: (i) SCP as a stand-alone goal; and (ii) SCP as a cross-cutting objective, embedded within relevant goals. While these two options are not necessarily mutually exclusive, given the competing number of issues for prioritization and the fact that a 10-Year Framework of Programs on SCP has also recently been established, it is hardly foreseeable that both options can be realized. The paper further proposes a set of basic principles for SCP at the global level and makes recommendations towards the formulation of indicators supporting SCP objectives in the SDGs.

1 October 2016 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CLChen Liu
Chen Liu
YHYasuhiko Hotta
Yasuhiko Hotta
ASAtsushi Santo
Atsushi Santo
MHMatthew Hengesbaugh
Matthew Hengesbaugh
AWAtsushi Watabe
Atsushi Watabe
MBMagnus Bengtsson
Magnus Bengtsson