Considering typical spectra of a broad range of carbonaceous materials from gas-shale to nanotubes, various ways by which defects show up in Raman spectra are exampled and discussed. The position, resonance behavior, and linewidth of both the D and G bands are compared, even if in some cases obtaining accurate information on the materials from the fitting parameters is a difficult task. As a matter of fact, even if a full picture is unreachable, defining parameter trends is one acceptable option. Two ways to determine the linewidth, either graphically and or by fitting are proposed in order to be able to compare literature data. The relationship between the crystallite size obtained from the linewidth and from X-ray diffraction, which is complementary to the Tuinstra and Koenig law, is examined. We show that a single approach is not possible unless modeling is performed and therefore that analysis of Raman spectra should be adapted to the specificities of each sample series, i.e., a minimum of knowledge about the materials is always required.

The question of how the texture and structure of carbon nanofilaments (CNTs) are determined during growth is addressed via their preparation using the vapour phase method over Ni–Cu–Mg–Al catalysts. The CNTs formed and the related catalyst particles were investigated by high resolution transmission electron microscopy, electron diffraction, and X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy. The nanofilament features were found to directly relate to the catalyst particle size and morphologies, which in turn depend on both the Ni/Cu ratio in the Ni–Cu alloy that forms the catalyst particles and the route by which they were prepared. The extent and orientation of graphenes within the carbon nanofilaments were found to be controlled by the extent of the related catalyst crystal faces and the angle value between the latter. It is proposed that energetics of graphenes, basically involving the ratio of the edge over the core carbon atoms, the energetic cost of heterocycles (pentagon), and that of the stress induced by the strain at graphene bending sites, determine whether the carbon nanofilaments would actually grow as nanotubes (i.e., hollow) with the dual “herringbone–bamboo” texture, or as nanofibres (i.e., not hollow) with either the “herringbone” texture or the platelet texture. Only the latter allowed the genuine graphite (3D periodicity) structure to develop, while the other nanofilament types could merely adopt the turbostratic structure. Meanwhile, it was demonstrated that the herringbone nanotubes and nanofibres here prepared are of “cup-stack” rather than “single helix” type.