Hong Ji

Dr. Hong Ji

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 July 2010 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KKK. Kim
K. Kim
ADA. Doi
A. Doi
BWBo Wen
Bo Wen
KNK. Ng
K. Ng
RZR. Zhao
R. Zhao
GDG. Q. Daley
G. Q. Daley
Somatic cell nuclear transfer and transcription-factor-based reprogramming revert adult cells to an embryonic state, and yield pluripotent stem cells that can generate all tissues. Through different mechanisms and kinetics, these two reprogramming methods reset genomic methylation, an epigenetic modification of DNA that influences gene expression, leading us to hypothesize that the resulting pluripotent stem cells might have different properties. Here we observe that low-passage induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) derived by factor-based reprogramming of adult murine tissues harbour residual DNA methylation signatures characteristic of their somatic tissue of origin, which favours their differentiation along lineages related to the donor cell, while restricting alternative cell fates. Such an ‘epigenetic memory’ of the donor tissue could be reset by differentiation and serial reprogramming, or by treatment of iPSCs with chromatin-modifying drugs. In contrast, the differentiation and methylation of nuclear-transfer-derived pluripotent stem cells were more similar to classical embryonic stem cells than were iPSCs. Our data indicate that nuclear transfer is more effective at establishing the ground state of pluripotency than factor-based reprogramming, which can leave an epigenetic memory of the tissue of origin that may influence efforts at directed differentiation for applications in disease modelling or treatment.

18 January 2009 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RIRafael A Irizarry
Rafael A Irizarry
CLChristine Ladd-Acosta
Christine Ladd-Acosta
BWBo Wen
Bo Wen
ZWZhijin Wu
Zhijin Wu
CMCarolina Montano
Carolina Montano
AFAndrew P Feinberg
Andrew P Feinberg
Andy Feinberg and colleagues show in a colon cancer model that most DNA methylation alterations occur in sequence regions distinct from promoters or canonical CpG islands, termed 'CpG island shores', and that this methylation is strongly related to gene expression and can discriminate tissue types regardless of species of origin. For the past 25 years, it has been known that alterations in DNA methylation (DNAm) occur in cancer, including hypomethylation of oncogenes and hypermethylation of tumor suppressor genes. However, most studies of cancer methylation have assumed that functionally important DNAm will occur in promoters, and that most DNAm changes in cancer occur in CpG islands. Here we show that most methylation alterations in colon cancer occur not in promoters, and also not in CpG islands, but in sequences up to 2 kb distant, which we term 'CpG island shores'. CpG island shore methylation was strongly related to gene expression, and it was highly conserved in mouse, discriminating tissue types regardless of species of origin. There was a notable overlap (45–65%) of the locations of colon cancer–related methylation changes with those that distinguished normal tissues, with hypermethylation enriched closer to the associated CpG islands, and hypomethylation enriched further from the associated CpG island and resembling that of noncolon normal tissues. Thus, methylation changes in cancer are at sites that vary normally in tissue differentiation, consistent with the epigenetic progenitor model of cancer, which proposes that epigenetic alterations affecting tissue-specific differentiation are the predominant mechanism by which epigenetic changes cause cancer.

15 August 2010 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HJHong Ji
Hong Ji
LELauren I. R. Ehrlich
Lauren I. R. Ehrlich
JSJun Seita
Jun Seita
PMPeter Murakami
Peter Murakami
ADAkiko Doi
Akiko Doi
AFAndrew P. Feinberg
Andrew P. Feinberg
Induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells are produced by reprogramming differentiated adult cells using a cocktail of transcription factors. They share many properties that are characteristic of embryonic stem (ES) cells generated by somatic-cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), and of ES cells from naturally fertilized embryos. The three cell types are not identical, however, and an interesting difference has now been discovered: iPS cells retain an 'epigenetic memory' of the donor tissue from which they derive, whereas SCNT-based reprogramming resets the DNA-methylation state of adult cells so it is closer to the ES cell-like state. In a separate study, Ji et al. examine the role of specific DNA methylation marks in the developmental progression of particular cell lineages. They present a genome-wide DNA-methylation analysis of haematopoietic cell populations that reveals remarkable epigenetic plasticity. Changes in DNA methylation emerge as perhaps a principal factor directing cell-fate choices such as commitment to myeloid or lymphoid development. During haematopoiesis, multipotent progenitors differentiate into progressively restricted myeloid or lymphoid progenitors. A comprehensive genome-wide DNA methylation analysis of haematopoietic cell populations with well-characterized differentiation potentials reveals remarkable epigenetic plasticity during lymphoid and myeloid restriction. Epigenetic modifications must underlie lineage-specific differentiation as terminally differentiated cells express tissue-specific genes, but their DNA sequence is unchanged. Haematopoiesis provides a well-defined model to study epigenetic modifications during cell-fate decisions, as multipotent progenitors (MPPs) differentiate into progressively restricted myeloid or lymphoid progenitors. Although DNA methylation is critical for myeloid versus lymphoid differentiation, as demonstrated by the myeloerythroid bias in Dnmt1 hypomorphs1, a comprehensive DNA methylation map of haematopoietic progenitors, or of any multipotent/oligopotent lineage, does not exist. Here we examined 4.6 million CpG sites throughout the genome for MPPs, common lymphoid progenitors (CLPs), common myeloid progenitors (CMPs), granulocyte/macrophage progenitors (GMPs), and thymocyte progenitors (DN1, DN2, DN3). Marked epigenetic plasticity accompanied both lymphoid and myeloid restriction. Myeloid commitment involved less global DNA methylation than lymphoid commitment, supported functionally by myeloid skewing of progenitors following treatment with a DNA methyltransferase inhibitor. Differential DNA methylation correlated with gene expression more strongly at CpG island shores than CpG islands. Many examples of genes and pathways not previously known to be involved in choice between lymphoid/myeloid differentiation have been identified, such as Arl4c and Jdp2. Several transcription factors, including Meis1, were methylated and silenced during differentiation, indicating a role in maintaining an undifferentiated state. Additionally, epigenetic modification of modifiers of the epigenome seems to be important in haematopoietic differentiation. Our results directly demonstrate that modulation of DNA methylation occurs during lineage-specific differentiation and defines a comprehensive map of the methylation and transcriptional changes that accompany myeloid versus lymphoid fate decisions.

22 June 2021 in Communications Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CBCarrie Breton
Carrie Breton
RLRemy Landon
Remy Landon
LKLinda Kahn
Linda Kahn
MEMichelle Bosquet Enlow
Michelle Bosquet Enlow
APAlicia K. Peterson
Alicia K. Peterson
RFRebecca Fry
Rebecca Fry
Environmental exposures, psychosocial stressors and nutrition are all potentially important influences that may impact health outcomes directly or via interactions with the genome or epigenome over generations. While there have been clear successes in large-scale human genetic studies in recent decades, there is still a substantial amount of missing heritability to be elucidated for complex childhood disorders. Mounting evidence, primarily in animals, suggests environmental exposures may generate or perpetuate altered health outcomes across one or more generations. One putative mechanism for these environmental health effects is via altered epigenetic regulation. This review highlights the current epidemiologic literature and supporting animal studies that describe intergenerational and transgenerational health effects of environmental exposures. Both maternal and paternal exposures and transmission patterns are considered, with attention paid to the attendant ethical, legal and social implications.

1 March 2016 in Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HSHari K. Somineni
Hari K. Somineni
XZXue Zhang
Xue Zhang
JMJocelyn M. Biagini Myers
Jocelyn M. Biagini Myers
Melinda Butsch KovacicMelinda Butsch Kovacic
Melinda Butsch Kovacic
AUAshley Ulm
Ashley Ulm
HJHong Ji
Hong Ji

1 January 2012 in Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HJHong Ji
Hong Ji
GHGurjit K. Khurana Hershey
Gurjit K. Khurana Hershey