Jun Seita

Dr. Jun Seita


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 July 2010 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KKK. Kim
K. Kim
ADA. Doi
A. Doi
BWBo Wen
Bo Wen
KNK. Ng
K. Ng
RZR. Zhao
R. Zhao
GDG. Q. Daley
G. Q. Daley
Somatic cell nuclear transfer and transcription-factor-based reprogramming revert adult cells to an embryonic state, and yield pluripotent stem cells that can generate all tissues. Through different mechanisms and kinetics, these two reprogramming methods reset genomic methylation, an epigenetic modification of DNA that influences gene expression, leading us to hypothesize that the resulting pluripotent stem cells might have different properties. Here we observe that low-passage induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) derived by factor-based reprogramming of adult murine tissues harbour residual DNA methylation signatures characteristic of their somatic tissue of origin, which favours their differentiation along lineages related to the donor cell, while restricting alternative cell fates. Such an ‘epigenetic memory’ of the donor tissue could be reset by differentiation and serial reprogramming, or by treatment of iPSCs with chromatin-modifying drugs. In contrast, the differentiation and methylation of nuclear-transfer-derived pluripotent stem cells were more similar to classical embryonic stem cells than were iPSCs. Our data indicate that nuclear transfer is more effective at establishing the ground state of pluripotency than factor-based reprogramming, which can leave an epigenetic memory of the tissue of origin that may influence efforts at directed differentiation for applications in disease modelling or treatment.

1 June 2007 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DRDerrick J. Rossi
Derrick J. Rossi
DBDavid Bryder
David Bryder
JSJun Seita
Jun Seita
ANAndre Nussenzweig
Andre Nussenzweig
JHJan Hoeijmakers
Jan Hoeijmakers
IWIrving L. Weissman
Irving L. Weissman

1 April 2010 in WIREs Mechanisms of Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JSJun Seita
Jun Seita
IWIrving L. Weissman
Irving L. Weissman

1 January 2015 in Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CCCharles KF Chan
Charles KF Chan
ESEun Young Seo
Eun Young Seo
JCJames Y. Chen
James Y. Chen
DLDavid Lo
David Lo
AMAdrian McArdle
Adrian McArdle
Michael T. LongakerMichael T. Longaker
Michael T. Longaker

20 May 2013 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DTDiane Tseng
Diane Tseng
JVJens-Peter Volkmer
Jens-Peter Volkmer
SWStephen B. Willingham
Stephen B. Willingham
HCHumberto Contreras-Trujillo
Humberto Contreras-Trujillo
JFJohn W. Fathman
John W. Fathman
IWIrving L. Weissman
Irving L. Weissman
Mobilization of the T-cell response against cancer has the potential to achieve long-lasting cures. However, it is not known how to harness antigen-presenting cells optimally to achieve an effective antitumor T-cell response. In this study, we show that anti-CD47 antibody–mediated phagocytosis of cancer by macrophages can initiate an antitumor T-cell immune response. Using the ovalbumin model antigen system, anti-CD47 antibody–mediated phagocytosis of cancer cells by macrophages resulted in increased priming of OT-I T cells [cluster of differentiation 8-positive (CD8+)] but decreased priming of OT-II T cells (CD4+). The CD4+T-cell response was characterized by a reduction in forkhead box P3-positive (Foxp3+) regulatory T cells. Macrophages following anti-CD47–mediated phagocytosis primed CD8+T cells to exhibit cytotoxic function in vivo.This response protected animals from tumor challenge. We conclude that anti-CD47 antibody treatment not only enables macrophage phagocytosis of cancer but also can initiate an antitumor cytotoxic T-cell immune response.

15 August 2010 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HJHong Ji
Hong Ji
LELauren I. R. Ehrlich
Lauren I. R. Ehrlich
JSJun Seita
Jun Seita
PMPeter Murakami
Peter Murakami
ADAkiko Doi
Akiko Doi
AFAndrew P. Feinberg
Andrew P. Feinberg
Induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells are produced by reprogramming differentiated adult cells using a cocktail of transcription factors. They share many properties that are characteristic of embryonic stem (ES) cells generated by somatic-cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), and of ES cells from naturally fertilized embryos. The three cell types are not identical, however, and an interesting difference has now been discovered: iPS cells retain an 'epigenetic memory' of the donor tissue from which they derive, whereas SCNT-based reprogramming resets the DNA-methylation state of adult cells so it is closer to the ES cell-like state. In a separate study, Ji et al. examine the role of specific DNA methylation marks in the developmental progression of particular cell lineages. They present a genome-wide DNA-methylation analysis of haematopoietic cell populations that reveals remarkable epigenetic plasticity. Changes in DNA methylation emerge as perhaps a principal factor directing cell-fate choices such as commitment to myeloid or lymphoid development. During haematopoiesis, multipotent progenitors differentiate into progressively restricted myeloid or lymphoid progenitors. A comprehensive genome-wide DNA methylation analysis of haematopoietic cell populations with well-characterized differentiation potentials reveals remarkable epigenetic plasticity during lymphoid and myeloid restriction. Epigenetic modifications must underlie lineage-specific differentiation as terminally differentiated cells express tissue-specific genes, but their DNA sequence is unchanged. Haematopoiesis provides a well-defined model to study epigenetic modifications during cell-fate decisions, as multipotent progenitors (MPPs) differentiate into progressively restricted myeloid or lymphoid progenitors. Although DNA methylation is critical for myeloid versus lymphoid differentiation, as demonstrated by the myeloerythroid bias in Dnmt1 hypomorphs1, a comprehensive DNA methylation map of haematopoietic progenitors, or of any multipotent/oligopotent lineage, does not exist. Here we examined 4.6 million CpG sites throughout the genome for MPPs, common lymphoid progenitors (CLPs), common myeloid progenitors (CMPs), granulocyte/macrophage progenitors (GMPs), and thymocyte progenitors (DN1, DN2, DN3). Marked epigenetic plasticity accompanied both lymphoid and myeloid restriction. Myeloid commitment involved less global DNA methylation than lymphoid commitment, supported functionally by myeloid skewing of progenitors following treatment with a DNA methyltransferase inhibitor. Differential DNA methylation correlated with gene expression more strongly at CpG island shores than CpG islands. Many examples of genes and pathways not previously known to be involved in choice between lymphoid/myeloid differentiation have been identified, such as Arl4c and Jdp2. Several transcription factors, including Meis1, were methylated and silenced during differentiation, indicating a role in maintaining an undifferentiated state. Additionally, epigenetic modification of modifiers of the epigenome seems to be important in haematopoietic differentiation. Our results directly demonstrate that modulation of DNA methylation occurs during lineage-specific differentiation and defines a comprehensive map of the methylation and transcriptional changes that accompany myeloid versus lymphoid fate decisions.