Peter L. Oliver

Prof. Peter L. Oliver

Mammalian Genetics Unit, MRC Harwell Institute and The Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, UK
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

37Years (1990-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2009 in Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CPChris P. Ponting
Chris P. Ponting
Peter L. OliverPeter L. Oliver
Peter L. Oliver
WRWolf Reik
Wolf Reik

14 September 2011 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TKThomas M. Keane
Thomas M. Keane
LGLeo Goodstadt
Leo Goodstadt
PDPetr Danecek
Petr Danecek
MWMichael A. White
Michael A. White
KWKim Wong
Kim Wong
DADavid Adams
David Adams
We report genome sequences of 17 inbred strains of laboratory mice and identify almost ten times more variants than previously known. We use these genomes to explore the phylogenetic history of the laboratory mouse and to examine the functional consequences of allele-specific variation on transcript abundance, revealing that at least 12% of transcripts show a significant tissue-specific expression bias. By identifying candidate functional variants at 718 quantitative trait loci we show that the molecular nature of functional variants and their position relative to genes vary according to the effect size of the locus. These sequences provide a starting point for a new era in the functional analysis of a key model organism.

13 August 2020 in Antioxidants
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Dominic SimpsonDominic Simpson
Dominic Simpson
Peter L. OliverPeter L. Oliver
Peter L. Oliver
Neurodegenerative disorders, such as Alzheimer’s disease, are a global public health burden with poorly understood aetiology. Neuroinflammation and oxidative stress (OS) are undoubtedly hallmarks of neurodegeneration, contributing to disease progression. Protein aggregation and neuronal damage result in the activation of disease-associated microglia (DAM) via damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). DAM facilitate persistent inflammation and reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation. However, the molecular mechanisms linking DAM activation and OS have not been well-defined; thus targeting these cells for clinical benefit has not been possible. In microglia, ROS are generated primarily by NADPH oxidase 2 (NOX2) and activation of NOX2 in DAM is associated with DAMP signalling, inflammation and amyloid plaque deposition, especially in the cerebrovasculature. Additionally, ROS originating from both NOX and the mitochondria may act as second messengers to propagate immune activation; thus intracellular ROS signalling may underlie excessive inflammation and OS. Targeting key kinases in the inflammatory response could cease inflammation and promote tissue repair. Expression of antioxidant proteins in microglia, such as NADPH dehydrogenase 1 (NQO1), is promoted by transcription factor Nrf2, which functions to control inflammation and limit OS. Lipid droplet accumulating microglia (LDAM) may also represent a double-edged sword in neurodegenerative disease by sequestering peroxidised lipids in non-pathological ageing but becoming dysregulated and pro-inflammatory in disease. We suggest that future studies should focus on targeted manipulation of NOX in the microglia to understand the molecular mechanisms driving inflammatory-related NOX activation. Finally, we discuss recent evidence that therapeutic target identification should be unbiased and founded on relevant pathophysiological assays to facilitate the discovery of translatable antioxidant and anti-inflammatory therapeutics.

27 November 2008 in New England Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SVSonja C. Vernes
Sonja C. Vernes
DNDianne Newbury
Dianne Newbury
BABrett S. Abrahams
Brett S. Abrahams
LWLaura Winchester
Laura Winchester
JNJérôme Nicod
Jérôme Nicod
SFSimon E. Fisher
Simon E. Fisher
Rare mutations affecting the FOXP2 transcription factor cause a monogenic speech and language disorder. We hypothesized that neural pathways downstream of FOXP2 influence more common phenotypes, such as specific language impairment. We performed genomic screening for regions bound by FOXP2 using chromatin immunoprecipitation, which led us to focus on one particular gene that was a strong candidate for involvement in language impairments. We then tested for associations between single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in this gene and language deficits in a well-characterized set of 184 families affected with specific language impairment. We found that FOXP2 binds to and dramatically down-regulates CNTNAP2, a gene that encodes a neurexin and is expressed in the developing human cortex. On analyzing CNTNAP2 polymorphisms in children with typical specific language impairment, we detected significant quantitative associations with nonsense-word repetition, a heritable behavioral marker of this disorder (peak association, P=5.0×10−5 at SNP rs17236239). Intriguingly, this region coincides with one associated with language delays in children with autism. The FOXP2–CNTNAP2 pathway provides a mechanistic link between clinically distinct syndromes involving disrupted language.

1 January 2007 in Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DKDavid A. Keays
David A. Keays
GTGuoling Tian
Guoling Tian
KPKarine Poirier
Karine Poirier
GHGuo-Jen Huang
Guo-Jen Huang
CSChristian Siebold
Christian Siebold
JFJonathan Flint
Jonathan Flint
The development of the mammalian brain is dependent on extensive neuronal migration. Mutations in mice and humans that affect neuronal migration result in abnormal lamination of brain structures with associated behavioral deficits. Here, we report the identification of a hyperactive N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU)-induced mouse mutant with abnormalities in the laminar architecture of the hippocampus and cortex, accompanied by impaired neuronal migration. We show that the causative mutation lies in the guanosine triphosphate (GTP) binding pocket of alpha-1 tubulin (Tuba1) and affects tubulin heterodimer formation. Phenotypic similarity with existing mouse models of lissencephaly led us to screen a cohort of patients with developmental brain anomalies. We identified two patients with de novo mutations in TUBA3, the human homolog of Tuba1. This study demonstrates the utility of ENU mutagenesis in the mouse as a means to discover the basis of human neurodevelopmental disorders.

21 August 2009 in PLOS Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JPJasmina Ponjavic
Jasmina Ponjavic
Peter L. OliverPeter L. Oliver
Peter L. Oliver
GLGerton Lunter
Gerton Lunter
CPChris P. Ponting
Chris P. Ponting
Besides protein-coding mRNAs, eukaryotic transcriptomes include many long non-protein-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) of unknown function that are transcribed away from protein-coding loci. Here, we have identified 659 intergenic long ncRNAs whose genomic sequences individually exhibit evolutionary constraint, a hallmark of functionality. Of this set, those expressed in the brain are more frequently conserved and are significantly enriched with predicted RNA secondary structures. Furthermore, brain-expressed long ncRNAs are preferentially located adjacent to protein-coding genes that are (1) also expressed in the brain and (2) involved in transcriptional regulation or in nervous system development. This led us to the hypothesis that spatiotemporal co-expression of ncRNAs and nearby protein-coding genes represents a general phenomenon, a prediction that was confirmed subsequently by in situ hybridisation in developing and adult mouse brain. We provide the full set of constrained long ncRNAs as an important experimental resource and present, for the first time, substantive and predictive criteria for prioritising long ncRNA and mRNA transcript pairs when investigating their biological functions and contributions to development and disease. Virtually all of the eukaryotic genome is transcribed, yet far from all transcripts encode protein. Very little is known about the functions of most non-coding transcripts or, indeed, whether they convey functions at all. Among all such transcripts, we have chosen to consider long non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) that are transcribed outside of known protein-coding gene loci. Our approach has focused on mouse long ncRNAs whose genomic sequences are conserved in humans, and also on ncRNAs that are expressed in the brain. This conservation might reflect the functionality of the underlying DNA, rather than the ncRNA, sequence. However, this cannot fully explain the concentration of predicted RNA structures in these ncRNAs. These long ncRNAs also tend to be transcribed in the genomic neighbourhood of protein-coding genes whose functions relate to transcription or to nervous system development. These observations are consistent with the positive transcriptional regulation in cis of these genes with nearby transcription of ncRNAs. This model implies co-expression of protein-coding and noncoding transcripts, a hypothesis that we validated experimentally. These findings are particularly important because they provide a rationale for prioritising specific ncRNAs when experimentally investigating regulation of protein-coding gene expression.