Migration and ethical recruitment of health care workers is receiving increased attention worldwide. Europe’s aging population is creating new opportunities for medical doctors for finding employment in other countries, particularly those of a better standard of living.

Background: The implementation of public policies requires special attention from public authorities to ensure their transparency, effectiveness and efficiency. For this reason, efforts to evaluate the abovementioned politics gained attention and importance. Similar processes, by their very nature, are also noticeable in the area of health policy, however, the nature of the solutions used raises questions about the extent to which they allow to capture the assessed phenomenon in a holistic way. The current approach to the problem of evaluating health policy shows a tendency to break down this phenomenon into components including policies, programs or projects. The purpose of this publication was to assess the main methodological approaches used in evaluation studies in terms of their usefulness and limitations in conducting overall assessment of health policy.Main body: The publication divides evaluation methods based on three main criteria identified in the literature—time, purpose and scope of evaluation. Methodological approaches to evaluation activities detailed on this basis are discussed from the point of view of their characteristics, usefulness and limitations in the creation of comprehensive health policy assessments. The growing awareness of the need for a different approach to evaluation, which was confirmed by the course of the discourse on evaluation in public health, was also pointed out.Conclusion: Given the complexity of the matter making up the health policy, attempts aimed at its overall assessment should be based on an approach integrating many approaches, while ensuring coordination of evaluation activities that should be subject to common assumptions.

Background: Poland is facing the growing problem of overweight and obesity in the population, which makes it necessary to conduct a thorough assessment of the existing food environment policies. The aims of the study were: (1) to depict the strength of healthy food environment policies in Poland and identify implementation policies and infrastructure support gaps; (2) to identify and prioritise improvement policies, taking into account their importance, achievability and equity. Methods: We used the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI). An experts’ panel rated Polish policies and infrastructure compared to international best practices and developed a list of recommended improvement actions addressing both components. Results: eight of the twenty-two policy and four of the twenty-two infrastructure indicators achieved the “no/very weak policy” result. Another four policy and five infrastructure indicators were considered “weak”. Another seven and eight indicators, respectively, were assessed as “moderate”. Among the identified actions, the highest priority was given to a food labelling system and training for persons involved in nutrition in schools. Conclusions: The Polish healthy food environment has been assessed as very weak or weak in most aspects. The infrastructure was assessed as slightly better compared to the policies domain, with more indicators receiving the “moderate” score.

The effectiveness of health systems is an area of constant interest for public health researchers and practitioners. The varied approach to effectiveness itself has resulted in numerous methodological proposals related to its measurement. The limitations of the currently used methods lead to a constant search for better tools for the assessment of health systems. This article shows the possibilities of using the health system synthetic outcome measure (SOM) for this purpose. It is an original tool using 41 indicators referring to the epidemiological situation, health behaviors, and factors related to the health-care system, which allows a relatively quick and easy assessment of the health system in terms of its effectiveness. Construction of the measure of health system functioning in such a way allowed its presentation in dynamic perspective, i.e., assessing not only the health system itself in a given moment of time but also changes in the value of the effectiveness measures. In order to demonstrate the cognitive value of the SOM, the analysis of the effectiveness of health systems in 21 countries of Central and Eastern Europe during the transformation period was carried out. The mean SOM values calculated on the basis of the component measures allowed to differentiate countries in terms of the effectiveness of their health systems. Considering the whole period, a similar level of health system effects can be observed in Slovenia, Croatia, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Poland, Macedonia, and Albania. In the middle group, Hungary, Romania, Latvia, Lithuania, Georgia, Estonia, Bulgaria, Belarus, and Armenia were found. The third group, weakest in terms of achieved effects, was formed by health systems in countries like Ukraine, Moldova, and Russia. The presented method allows for the analysis of the health system outcomes from a comparative angle, eliminating arbitrariness of pinpointing a model solution as a potential reference point in the assessment of the systems. The measure, with the use of additional statistical tools to establish correlations with elements of the external and internal environment of a health system, allows for conducting analyses of conditions for differences in the effects of health system operation and circumstances for the effectiveness of reform processes.

The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) provides a biopsychosocial framework for describing patients' functioning, but its comprehensive structure poses challenges for routine clinical use and health system reporting. In Poland, rehabilitation services lacked a standardized approach to functioning assessment that would support coordinated care and comparable outcome documentation at national level. This paper aims to describe the development and implementation of a tool for the quality assessment of therapeutic rehabilitation in Poland, focusing on the standardisation of patient functioning assessment using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). The study was structured around the creation of functioning assessment standards (categorical profiles), a unified system for planning patient support (intervention sheet), and post-rehabilitation assessment sheets to ensure comprehensive evaluation of rehabilitation effectiveness at individual, hospital, and national levels. Within a national implementation project, we developed an ICF‑based functioning assessment system for inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation, including categorical profiles for major rehabilitation types, auxiliary tools (Short Intuitive Descriptions, rating guides, conversion protocols) and a dedicated IT application. The system was pilot‑tested in 12 rehabilitation centres (1 800 patients; 1 200 inpatients and 600 outpatients) using pre‑ and post‑rehabilitation assessments and WHO's WHODAS 2.0 questionnaires. The pilot indicated that ICF‑based categorical profiles were feasible to use in routine practice and sensitive to changes in patients' functioning over the course of rehabilitation. The system differentiated outcomes between centres and showed moderate to high inter‑rater agreement for most ICF categories, with several codes reaching very high ICC values, which require cautious interpretation. WHODAS 2.0 scores were broadly consistent with ICF‑based profiles, particularly in activity and participation domains. This pilot suggests that an ICF‑based functioning assessment system can support more standardized, biopsychosocially oriented rehabilitation in Poland, while highlighting important implementation challenges, including resource demands, staff training needs and difficulties in assessing environmental factors. Further research is needed to establish long‑term outcomes, refine psychometric properties and evaluate cost‑effectiveness of system‑wide implementation.

Introduction: Healthcare systems are subject to evaluation by all its participants and the public. The results of national studies available in this regard suggest a clearly negative perception of the Polish healthcare system. This attitude can be interpreted as a consequence of unfulfilled expectations of the public opinion, which constitutes expectations as important study field. The general aim is to verify the current state of research on the relationship between the components of knowledge, expectations and evaluation in order to identify dominating research directions as well as gaps in existing knowledge. Material and Methods: The study used the method of narrative review conducted in the PubMed and Embase databases. Only publications in English were included in the review. Results: 2239 source articles were identified, and 36 publications were included in the final analysis. Based on Laferton’s model , the analyzed sources were categorized according to the reference to expectations related to behavior or therapy. Out of 36 analyzed publications 28 (77.78%) were papers assigned to at least 2 categories. In total 24 out of 36 (66.67%) articles included were those referring to expectations related to treatment results. Most of the publications (63.9%, i.e. 23 out of 36) described the relationship between the knowledge and expectations. The connection between expectations and evaluation was investigated by 8 publications, and 5 publications combined all three elements (knowledge, expectations and evaluation). Conclusions: The review of the literature indicates that the level of knowledge of the recipients of health services may be an important determinant of their expectations towards service providers and the forms of treatment received. The collected evidence does not provide a clear answer to the question of the impact of making expectations more realistic on the assessment of the health care system.