Katinka Ruthrof

Dr. Katinka Ruthrof


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 August 2015 in Ecosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MPMichael P. Perring
Michael P. Perring
RSRachel J. Standish
Rachel J. Standish
JPJodi N. Price
Jodi N. Price
MCMichael D. Craig
Michael D. Craig
TETodd E. Erickson
Todd E. Erickson
RHRichard J. Hobbs
Richard J. Hobbs
Simultaneous environmental changes challenge biodiversity persistence and human wellbeing. The science and practice of restoration ecology, in collaboration with other disciplines, can contribute to overcoming these challenges. This endeavor requires a solid conceptual foundation based in empirical research which confronts, tests and influences theoretical developments. We review conceptual developments in restoration ecology over the last 30 years. We frame our review in the context of changing restoration goals which reflect increased societal awareness of the scale of environmental degradation and the recognition that inter‐disciplinary approaches are needed to tackle environmental problems. Restoration ecology now encompasses facilitative interactions and network dynamics, trophic cascades, and above‐ and belowground linkages. It operates in a non‐equilibrium, alternative states framework, at the landscape scale, and in response to changing environmental, economic and social conditions. Progress has been marked by conceptual advances in the fields of trait‐environment relationships, community assembly, and understanding the links between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Conceptual and practical advances have been enhanced by applying evolving technologies, including treatments to increase seed germination and overcome recruitment bottlenecks, high throughput DNA sequencing to elucidate soil community structure and function, and advances in satellite technology and GPS tracking to monitor habitat use. The synthesis of these technologies with systematic reviews of context dependencies in restoration success, model based analyses and consideration of complex socio‐ecological systems will allow generalizations to inform evidence based interventions. Ongoing challenges include setting realistic, socially acceptable goals for restoration under changing environmental conditions, and prioritizing actions in an increasingly space‐competitive world. Ethical questions also surround the use of genetically modified material, translocations, taxon substitutions, and de‐extinction, in restoration ecology. Addressing these issues, as the Ecological Society of America looks to its next century, will require current and future generations of researchers and practitioners, including economists, engineers, philosophers, landscape architects, social scientists and restoration ecologists, to work together with communities and governments to rise to the environmental challenges of the coming decades.

25 February 2021 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DBDana M. Bergstrom
Dana M. Bergstrom
BWBarbara C. Wienecke
Barbara C. Wienecke
JHJohn van den Hoff
John van den Hoff
LHLesley Hughes
Lesley Hughes
DLDavid B Lindenmayer
David B Lindenmayer
JSJustine D. Shaw
Justine D. Shaw

17 March 2021 in New Phytologist
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DBDavid D. Breshears
David D. Breshears
JFJoseph B. Fontaine
Joseph B. Fontaine
KRKatinka Ruthrof
Katinka Ruthrof
JFJason P. Field
Jason P. Field
XFXiao Feng
Xiao Feng
GHGiles Hardy
Giles Hardy
Summary: With climate change, heat waves are becoming increasingly frequent, intense and broader in spatial extent. However, while the lethal effects of heat waves on humans are well documented, the impacts on flora are less well understood, perhaps except for crops. We summarize recent findings related to heat wave impacts including: sublethal and lethal effects at leaf and plant scales, secondary ecosystem effects, and more complex impacts such as increased heat wave frequency across all seasons, and interactions with other disturbances. We propose generalizable practical trials to quantify the critical bounding conditions of vulnerability to heat waves. Collectively, plant vulnerabilities to heat waves appear to be underappreciated and understudied, particularly with respect to understanding heat wave driven plant die‐off and ecosystem tipping points.

17 February 2013 in European Journal of Forest Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GMGeorge Matusick
George Matusick
KRKatinka Ruthrof
Katinka Ruthrof
NBNiels Brouwers
Niels Brouwers
BDBernard Dell
Bernard Dell
GHGiles Hardy
Giles Hardy

30 August 2018 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KRKatinka Ruthrof
Katinka Ruthrof
DBDavid D. Breshears
David D. Breshears
JFJoseph B. Fontaine
Joseph B. Fontaine
RFRay Froend
Ray Froend
GMGeorge Matusick
George Matusick
GHGiles E. St. J. Hardy
Giles E. St. J. Hardy
Heat waves have profoundly impacted biota globally over the past decade, especially where their ecological impacts are rapid, diverse, and broad-scale. Although usually considered in isolation for either terrestrial or marine ecosystems, heat waves can straddle ecosystems of both types at subcontinental scales, potentially impacting larger areas and taxonomic breadth than previously envisioned. Using climatic and multi-species demographic data collected in Western Australia, we show that a massive heat wave event straddling terrestrial and maritime ecosystems triggered abrupt, synchronous, and multi-trophic ecological disruptions, including mortality, demographic shifts and altered species distributions. Tree die-off and coral bleaching occurred concurrently in response to the heat wave, and were accompanied by terrestrial plant mortality, seagrass and kelp loss, population crash of an endangered terrestrial bird species, plummeting breeding success in marine penguins, and outbreaks of terrestrial wood-boring insects. These multiple taxa and trophic-level impacts spanned >300,000 km2—comparable to the size of California—encompassing one terrestrial Global Biodiversity Hotspot and two marine World Heritage Areas. The subcontinental multi-taxa context documented here reveals that terrestrial and marine biotic responses to heat waves do not occur in isolation, implying that the extent of ecological vulnerability to projected increases in heat waves is underestimated.

1 December 2019 in Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RMRussell Miller
Russell Miller
RTRyan Tangney
Ryan Tangney
NENeal J. Enright
Neal J. Enright
JFJoseph B. Fontaine
Joseph B. Fontaine
DMDavid J. Merritt
David J. Merritt
BMBen P. Miller
Ben P. Miller