Ray Froend

Prof. Dr. Ray Froend

Centre for Ecosystem Management, School of Science, Edith Cowan University, Western Australia

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 January 2013 in Journal of Experimental Botany
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PDPaul L. Drake
Paul L. Drake
RFRay Froend
Ray Froend
PFPeter J. Franks
Peter J. Franks
Maximum and minimum stomatal conductance, as well as stomatal size and rate of response, are known to vary widely across plant species, but the functional relationship between these static and dynamic stomatal properties is unknown. The objective of this study was to test three hypotheses: (i) operating stomatal conductance under standard conditions (gop) correlates with minimum stomatal conductance prior to morning light [gmin(dawn)]; (ii) stomatal size (S) is negatively correlated with gop and the maximum rate of stomatal opening in response to light, (dg/dt)max; and (iii) gop correlates negatively with instantaneous water-use efficiency (WUE) despite positive correlations with maximum rate of carboxylation (Vcmax) and light-saturated rate of electron transport (Jmax). Using five closely related species of the genus Banksia, the above variables were measured, and it was found that all three hypotheses were supported by the results. Overall, this indicates that leaves built for higher rates of gas exchange have smaller stomata and faster dynamic characteristics. With the aid of a stomatal control model, it is demonstrated that higher gop can potentially expose plants to larger tissue water potential gradients, and that faster stomatal response times can help offset this risk.

3 November 2006 in Plant, Cell & Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PFPeter J. Franks
Peter J. Franks
PDPaul L. Drake
Paul L. Drake
RFRay Froend
Ray Froend
Isohydric and anisohydric regulations of plant water status have been observed over several decades of field, glasshouse and laboratory studies, yet the functional significance and mechanism of both remain obscure. We studied the seasonal trends in plant water status and hydraulic properties in a natural stand of Eucalyptus gomphocephala through cycles of varying environmental moisture (rainfall, groundwater depth, evaporative demand) in order to test for isohydry and to provide physiological information for the mechanistic interpretation of seasonal trends in plant water status. Over a 16 month period of monitoring, spanning two summers, midday leaf water potential (Ψleaf) correlated with predawn Ψleaf, which was correlated with water table depth below ground level, which in turn was correlated with total monthly rainfall. Eucalyptus gomphocephala was therefore not seasonally isohydric. Despite strong stomatal down‐regulation of transpiration rate in response to increasing evaporative demand, this was insufficient to prevent midday Ψleaf from falling to levels below −2 MPa in the driest month, well into the region likely to induce xylem air embolisms, based on xylem vulnerability curves obtained in the study. However, even though midday Ψleaf varied by over 1.2 MPa across seasons, the hydrodynamic (transpiration‐induced) water potential gradient from roots to shoots (ΔΨplant), measured as the difference between predawn and midday Ψleaf, was relatively constant across seasons, averaging 0.67 MPa. This unusual pattern of hydraulic regulation, referred to here as isohydrodynamic, is explained by a hydromechanical stomatal control model where plant hydraulic conductance is dependent on transpiration rate.

5 April 2006 in Australian Journal of Botany
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DEDerek Eamus
Derek Eamus
RFRay Froend
Ray Froend
RLRobyn Loomes
Robyn Loomes
Grant HoseGrant Hose
Grant Hose
Brad R MurrayBrad R Murray
Brad R Murray
In the past, the phrase ‘environmental allocations of water’ has most often been taken to mean allocation of water to rivers. However, it is now accepted that groundwater-dependent ecosystems are an important feature of Australian landscapes and require an allocation of water to maintain their persistence in the landscape. However, moving from this theoretical realisation to the provision and implementation of a field-based management regime is extremely difficult. The following four fundamental questions are identified as being central to the effective management of groundwater-dependent ecosystems (GDEs): (1) How do we identify GDEs in the field; put another way, which species or species assemblages or habitats are reliant on a supply of groundwater for their persistence in the landscape; (2) what groundwater regime is required to ensure the persistence of a GDE; (3) how can managers of natural resources (principally water and habitats), with limited time, money and other resources, successfully manage GDEs; and (4) what measures of ecosystem function can be monitored to ensure that management is effective? This paper explicitly addresses these questions and provides a step-by-step theoretical and practical framework for providing answers. In particular, this paper provides an introduction to some of the relevant literature and from this, presents a synthesis, presented in the form of a functional methodology for managing groundwater dependent ecosystems.

1 March 2002 in Oecologia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SZSandra J. Zencich
Sandra J. Zencich
RFRay Froend
Ray Froend
JTJeffrey V. Turner
Jeffrey V. Turner
VGVit Gailitis
Vit Gailitis

5 April 2006 in Australian Journal of Botany
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DEDerek Eamus
Derek Eamus
RFRay Froend
Ray Froend
The Australian Journal of Botany is an international journal publishing original research encompassing all plant groups including fossil plants. Plant science areas covered by the scope are as follows: ecology and ecophysiology, conservation biology and biodiversity, forest biology and management, cell and molecular biology, palaeobotany, reproductrive biology and genetics, mycology and pathology, structure and development.

30 August 2018 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KRKatinka Ruthrof
Katinka Ruthrof
DBDavid D. Breshears
David D. Breshears
JFJoseph B. Fontaine
Joseph B. Fontaine
RFRay Froend
Ray Froend
GMGeorge Matusick
George Matusick
GHGiles E. St. J. Hardy
Giles E. St. J. Hardy
Heat waves have profoundly impacted biota globally over the past decade, especially where their ecological impacts are rapid, diverse, and broad-scale. Although usually considered in isolation for either terrestrial or marine ecosystems, heat waves can straddle ecosystems of both types at subcontinental scales, potentially impacting larger areas and taxonomic breadth than previously envisioned. Using climatic and multi-species demographic data collected in Western Australia, we show that a massive heat wave event straddling terrestrial and maritime ecosystems triggered abrupt, synchronous, and multi-trophic ecological disruptions, including mortality, demographic shifts and altered species distributions. Tree die-off and coral bleaching occurred concurrently in response to the heat wave, and were accompanied by terrestrial plant mortality, seagrass and kelp loss, population crash of an endangered terrestrial bird species, plummeting breeding success in marine penguins, and outbreaks of terrestrial wood-boring insects. These multiple taxa and trophic-level impacts spanned >300,000 km2—comparable to the size of California—encompassing one terrestrial Global Biodiversity Hotspot and two marine World Heritage Areas. The subcontinental multi-taxa context documented here reveals that terrestrial and marine biotic responses to heat waves do not occur in isolation, implying that the extent of ecological vulnerability to projected increases in heat waves is underestimated.