Remote monitoring including transmission of electrocardiogram (ECG) strips has been implemented in implantable cardiac monitors (ICM). We appraise whether the physician can rely on remote monitoring to be informed of all possibly significant arrhythmias. We analyzed remote monitoring transmissions of patients in the ongoing BIO|GUARD-MI study, in which Biotronik devices are used. Once per day, the devices automatically transmit messages with up to six ECG snapshots to the Home Monitoring Service Center. If more than one type of arrhythmia is recorded during a day, at least one ECG of each arrhythmia type is transmitted. 212 study patients were registered at the service center. The mean age of the patients was 70 ± 8 years, and 74% were male. Patients were followed for an average of 13 months. The median time from device implantation until the first message receipt in the service center was 2 days. The median patient-individual transmission success was 98.0% (IQR 93.6-99.8) and remained stable in the second and third year. The most frequent arrhythmias were atrial fibrillation, bradycardia and high ventricular rate. 17.3% of the messages with ECG snapshots contained more than one arrhythmia type. Our analysis confirms that the physician can rely on Home Monitoring to be informed of all possibly significant arrhythmias during long-term follow-up. We have found hints that the transmission of only one episode per day may lead to the loss of clinically relevant information if patients with ICMs are followed by remote monitoring only.

Background: The QLV ratio (QLV/baseline QRS width) is an established intraoperative-measurable parameter during cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device implantation, potentially predicting the efficacy of electrical resynchronization. Methods: Left bundle branch area pacing-optimized CRT (LOT-CRT) is a novel approach with the potential to improve both responder rate and responder level in the CRT candidate patient group, even when an optimal electro-anatomical left ventricular lead position is not achievable. In our observational study, 72 CRT-defibrillator candidate patients with a QRS duration of 160 ± 12 ms were consecutively implanted. Using a QLV-ratio-based implant strategy, 40 patients received a biventricular CRT device (Biv-CRT) with an optimal QLV ratio (≥70%). Twenty-eight patients with a suboptimal QLV ratio (<70%) were upgraded intraoperatively to a LOT-CRT system. Patients were followed for 12 months. Results: The postoperative results showed a significantly greater reduction in QRS width in the LOT-CRT patient group compared to the Biv-CRT patients (40.4 ± 14 ms vs. 32 ± 13 ms; p = 0.024). At 12 months, the LOT-CRT group also demonstrated a significantly greater improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (14.9 ± 8% vs. 10.3 ± 7.4%; p = 0.001), and New York Heart Association functional class (1.2 ± 0.5 vs. 0.8 ± 0.4; p = 0.031), and a significant decrease in NT-pro-BNP levels (1863± 380 pg/mL vs. 1238 ± 412 pg/mL; p = 0.012). Notably, the LOT-CRT patients showed results comparable to Biv-CRT patients with a super-optimal QLV ratio (>80%) in terms of QRS width reduction and LVEF improvement. Conclusions: Our single-center study demonstrated the feasibility of a QLV-ratio-based implantation strategy during CRT implantation. Patients with a LOT-CRT system showed significant improvements, whereas Biv-CRT patients with a super-optimal QLV ratio may not be expected to benefit from an additional LOT-CRT upgrade.

Introduction: The impact of remote monitoring (RM) on clinical outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D) is controversial. This study sought to evaluate the performance of an RM follow-up protocol using modified criteria of PARTNERS HF...

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) had spread into a pandemic affecting healthcare providers worldwide. Heart failure patients with implanted cardiac devices require close follow-up in-spite of pandemic related healthcare restrictions. Methods: Patients were retrospectively registered and clinical outcomes were compared of 61 remote monitored (RMG) versus 71 conventionally (in-office only) followed (CFG) cardiac device implanted, heart failure patients. Follow-up length was 12 months, during the COVID-19 pandemic related intermittent insitutional restrictions. We used a specified heart failure detection algorithm in RMG. This investigation compared worsening heart failure-, arrhythmia- and device related adverse events as primary outcome and heart failure hospitalization rates as secondary outcome in the two patient groups. Results: No significant difference was observed in the primary composite end-point during the first 12 months of COVID-19 pandemic (p = 0.672). In RMG, patients who had worsening heart failure event had relative modest deterioration in heart failure functional class (p = 0.026), relative lower elevation of N terminal-pro BNP levels (p < 0.01) at in-office evaluation and were less hospitalized for worsening heart failure in the first 6 months of pandemic (p = 0.012) compared to CFG patients. Conclusions: Specified remote monitoring alert-based detection algorithm and workflow in device implanted heart failure patients may potentially indicate early worsening in heart failure status. Preemptive adequate intervention may prevent further progression of deteriorating heart failure and thus prevent heart failure hospitalizations.

Background Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is considered an efficient method to improve the left ventricular (LV) dysfunction with left bundle branch block. However, coronary venous anatomy is not appropriate in about 10% of the cases; thus other alternatives, such as epicardial lead implantation via minithoracotomy are needed. Methods During the period 2007-2017, a total of 57 patients were operated at our institute via left anterior minithoracotomy after an unsuccessful transvenous CRT. The best position of the LV epicardial electrode was determined by intraoperative epicardial mapping, that is locating the latest activation spot relative to the right ventricular (RV) electrode. The authors analyzed the survival by Kaplan-Meier estimator with Tarone-Ware equality test and multiple Cox regression analysis, the changes of the LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and dimensions, the development of the impedance and threshold of the LV epicardial electrode, the possible associations between the survival and intraoperative sensed RV-LV activation delay. Results The intraoperative RV-LV activation delay was 92.250 +/- 26.538 milliseconds. There were no intraoperative complications except ventricular fibrillation in three patients. Within 30 days there were neither wound healing complications nor pocket hematoma. There was no significant difference in survival with regard to gender or etiology, but significantly better survival was found in the cohort with intraoperative sensed RV-LV activation delay >86 milliseconds. The LVEF and dimensions improved following the operation and continued to be improved in the survivors. Conclusion CRT via minithoracotomy with epicardial mapping is a safe, efficient, simple, and reproducible second-line alternative to the transvenous method.

The treatment of severe coronary stenoses with stent implantation is very effective nevertheless, the underlying problem of atherosclerosis remains unsolved with the implantation of a stent. Therefore, besides lifestyle changes, the adequate medication therapy is of pivotal importance. In the majority of patients scheduled for or acutely undergoing catheterisation, beta-blockers form the basis of medication therapy. Members of the group, however, show significant differences in terms of pharmacodynamics. The third-generation beta-blocker and vasodilator carvedilol possesses complex adrenerg-blocking and Ca-channel blocking effects as well. In the background of the favourable effects, a further positive property is its anti-free-radical effect which most beta-blockers do not have. Therefore, as has been proven by several studies, it provides considerable benefits in hypertension, after myocardial infarction, in diabetes and also in the treatment of patients with cardiac failure. These positive effects have been markedly observed in interventional cardiology practice, as the majority of patients undergoing cardiac catheterisation have hypertension, diabetes or hyperlipidaemia. Its anti-free-radical effect is especially beneficial together with its smooth muscle proliferation-inhibitor effect which may favourably affect in-stent restenosis (ISR) as well. To summarise, due to its vasculoprotective effect, carvedilol is an ideal drug of choice following stent implantation in routine everyday practice. Orv Hetil. 2017; 158(37): 1453–1457.