The backfat of pig carcasses is greater in spring than summer in Australia. The unexplained seasonal variation in carcass backfat creates complications for pig producers in supplying consistent lean carcasses. As a novel explanation, we hypothesised that the increased carcass fatness in spring was due to a greater percentage of born-light progeny from sows that were mated in summer and experienced hot conditions during early gestation. The first part of our experiment compared the birth weight of piglets born to the sows mated in summer (February, the Southern Hemisphere) with those born to sows mated in autumn (May; the Southern Hemisphere), and the second part of the experiment compared the growth performance and carcass fatness of the progeny that were stratified as born-light (0.7–1.1 kg) and born-normal (1.3–1.7 kg) from the sows mated in these two seasons. The results showed that the sows mated in summer experienced hotter conditions during early gestation as evidenced by an increased respiration rate and rectal temperature, compared with those mated in autumn. The sows mated in summer had a greater proportion of piglets that were born ≤1.1 kg (24.2% vs. 15.8%, p < 0.001), lower average piglet birth weight (1.39 kg vs. 1.52 kg, p < 0.001), lower total litter weights (18.9 kg vs. 19.5 kg, p = 0.044) and lower average placental weight (0.26 vs. 0.31 kg, p = 0.011) than those mated in autumn, although litter sizes were similar. Feed intake and growth rate of progeny from 14 weeks of age to slaughter (101 kg live weight) were greater for the born-normal than born-light pigs within the progeny from sows mated in autumn, but there was no difference between the born-light and normal progeny from sows mated in summer, as evidenced by the interaction between piglet birth weight and sow mating season (Both p < 0.05). Only the born-light piglets from the sows mated in summer had a greater backfat thickness and loin fat% than the progeny from the sows mated in autumn, as evidenced by a trend of interaction between piglet birth weight and sow mating season (Both p < 0.10). In conclusion, the increased proportion of born-light piglets (0.7–1.1 kg range) from the sows mated in summer contributed to the increased carcass fatness observed in spring.

This review seeks to analyse and prioritise needs and gaps in research and development (R&D) for the north Australian beef cattle breeding industry, and to advise on options to increase rates of adoption and successful implementation of this R&D. The material reviewed includes the peer-reviewed literature as well as industry reports and other relevant publications in three targeted areas of R&D deemed to be important by industry leaders and supporting scientists: (i) breeding herd management, (ii) feedbase management, and (iii) management of environmental sustainability. For breeding herd management, the need for uniform definition and consistent utilisation of appropriate productivity metrics is highlighted, with emphasis on assessment of maternal reproductive efficiency in terms of weaning (or branding) rates. Priority is given to the urgent need for reliable means of remotely assessing causes of neonatal calf mortality to enable the development and application of management interventions that improve calf survival rates. The highest priority for feedbase management is to increase producer awareness and willingness to adopt stocking rates that are appropriately matched to the long-term carrying capacity of native rangeland pastures that predominate in northern Australia. Other opportunities include increasing the use of perennial, tropically adapted legumes, where conditions permit, to improve soil fertility and nitrogen intake of cattle, and devising strategies to overcome widespread phosphorus deficiency through diagnosis and supplementation, especially in the wet season. In order to enhance environmental sustainability in the face of climate change, priorities include improving producer awareness and use of increasingly robust tools for predicting key weather events, as well as developing genetic strategies to increase heat tolerance of cattle and evaluating management interventions to mitigate heat stress. Conclusions drawn from these sections are summarised and used to make recommendations on priorities for increasing adoption of existing research-proven practices and technologies, and for further R&D on selected topics.

This account of the development and achievements of the animal sciences in Australia is prefaced by a brief history of the livestock industries from 1788 to the present. During the 19th century, progress in industry development was due more to the experience and ingenuity of producers than to the application of scientific principles; the end of the century also saw the establishment of departments of agriculture and agricultural colleges in all Australian colonies (later states). Between the two world wars, the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research was established, including well supported Divisions of Animal Nutrition and Animal Health, and there was significant growth in research and extension capability in the state departments. However, the research capacity of the recently established university Faculties of Agriculture and Veterinary Science was limited by lack of funding and opportunity to offer postgraduate research training. The three decades after 1945 were marked by strong political support for agricultural research, development and extension, visionary scientific leadership, and major growth in research institutions and achievements, partly driven by increased university funding and enrolment of postgraduate students. State-supported extension services for livestock producers peaked during the 1970s. The final decades of the 20th century featured uncertain commodity markets and changing public attitudes to livestock production. There were also important Federal Government initiatives to stabilise industry and government funding of agricultural research, development and extension via the Research and Development Corporations, and to promote efficient use of these resources through creation of the Cooperative Research Centres program. These initiatives led to some outstanding research outcomes for most of the livestock sectors, which continued during the early decades of the 21st century, including the advent of genomic selection for genetic improvement of production and health traits, and greatly increased attention to public interest issues, particularly animal welfare and environmental protection. The new century has also seen development and application of the ‘One Health’ concept to protect livestock, humans and the environment from exotic infectious diseases, and an accelerating trend towards privatisation of extension services. Finally, industry challenges and opportunities are briefly discussed, emphasising those amenable to research, development and extension solutions.

This article is a compilation of pieces that are part biographical sketches and part personal recollections of 18 scientists with whom the author was acquainted in three continents over almost 50 years. The subjects, from Australia, the United States and the United Kingdom, will be recognisable to many in the field, especially more experienced scientists. For younger scientists, the article also is intended to put a human face on a generation of famous researchers who otherwise would be familiar only as somewhat anonymous authors of classic papers and reviews.

The purpose of this entry is to describe the processes of normal morphological and functional development of the placenta, the unique organ of pregnancy in higher animals. The consequences of abnormal development for fetal growth and development are also briefly considered. Examples are confined to eutherian mammals in which the placenta is most highly developed, with most emphasis on the large domestic species.