In human motion studies, discrete points such as peak or average kinematic values are commonly selected to test hypotheses. The purpose of this study was to describe a functional data analysis and describe the advantages of using functional data analyses when compared with a traditional analysis of variance (ANOVA) approach. Nineteen healthy participants (age: 22 ± 2 yrs, body height: 1.7 ± 0.1 m, body mass: 73 ± 16 kg) walked under two different conditions: control and pain+effusion. Pain+effusion was induced by injection of sterile saline into the joint capsule and hypertonic saline into the infrapatellar fat pad. Sagittal-plane ankle, knee, and hip joint kinematics were recorded and compared following injections using 2×2 mixed model ANOVAs and FANOVAs. The results of ANOVAs detected a condition × time interaction for the peak ankle (F1,18 = 8.56, p = 0.01) and hip joint angle (F1,18 = 5.77, p = 0.03), but did not for the knee joint angle (F1,18 = 0.36, p = 0.56). The functional data analysis, however, found several differences at initial contact (ankle and knee joint), in the mid-stance (each joint) and at toe off (ankle). Although a traditional ANOVA is often appropriate for discrete or summary data, in biomechanical applications, the functional data analysis could be a beneficial alternative. When using the functional data analysis approach, a researcher can (1) evaluate the entire data as a function, and (2) detect the location and magnitude of differences within the evaluated function.

Context: While arthrogenous muscle inhibition associated with knee injuries is evident, the relative magnitude of functional deficiency related to each individual knee pathology is unclear. Objective: To compare the knee joint and quadriceps dysfunction among patients with anterior knee pain (AKP) without surgical history and those with surgical history (anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction [ACLR]; meniscus surgery) without current AKP, with matched healthy controls. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Laboratory. Participants: A total of 66 patients with knee pathologies and 30 controls. Main Outcome Measures: Pain perception and lower-extremity functional outcomes were assessed. Knee joint function was measured by replication tests. Quadriceps function was measured by strength, voluntary activation, and torque-generating capacity. Results: Patients with AKP reported greater pain perception compared with the other knee conditions (4.3 vs 0.1 of 10 in Numeric Pain Rating Scale, P < .0001). Compared with the controls: (1) patients with AKP showed a greater error on knee-flexion replications at 75° (2.9° vs 5.4°, P = .002), (2) patients with AKP and ACLR showed less quadriceps strength (AKP: 3.3 vs 2.6 N·m/kg, P = .002; ACLR: 3.3 vs 2.7 N·m/kg, P = .02) and voluntary activation (AKP: 0.982 vs 0.928, P < .0001; ACLR: 0.982 vs 0.946, P = .003), and (3) all knee pathologies reported lower scores on functional outcomes (79 vs 65 of 80 points in Lower-Extremity Functional Scale, P < .0001) and showed less quadriceps torque-generating capacity (10.7 vs 7.8 N·m/s/kg, P < .0001). Among the knee pathologies, patients with AKP showed less quadriceps voluntary activation compared with the patients with meniscus surgery (0.928 vs 0.964, P = .03). Conclusion: As patients with AKP had an additional impairment in knee joint flexion replications and reported a less score in functional outcomes, knee pain may produce a greater impact on functional deficiency.

Background. The prediction of motor recovery after stroke is an important issue, and various prediction models have been proposed using either clinical behavioral or neurological biomarkers. This study sought to identify the effects of clinical behavioral biomarkers combined with corticospinal tract (CST) injury measurement on the prediction of motor recovery after stroke. Methods. The region of interest was drawn on the normalized brain magnetic resonance imaging scans of patients with first-ever unilateral hemispheric stroke, and the degree of CST injury was calculated in a total of 67 such subjects. Patients who had initial minor deficits and showed a ceiling effect on motor recovery were excluded. To predict the follow-up Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA) scores, correlation and regression analyses were performed using various clinical behavioral biomarkers, including age, sex, lesion location, and initial FMA scores and CST injury measurements. Results. Only the initial FMA-upper extremity (UE) score was statistically correlated with the follow-up FMA-UE score at ≥2 months after the onset (adjusted ), and the relationship between CST injury and follow-up FMA-UE score was unclear ( ). Hierarchical clustering between the initial and follow-up FMA-UE scores showed three clusters. After exclusion of a cluster with an initial FMA-UE ≥ 35, the prediction of the follow-up FMA-UE score was possible by incorporating the initial FMA-UE score and CST injury measurements ( ). However, the explanatory power decreased (adjusted ), and the unique contribution of the CST injury (10.1%) was lower than that of the initial FMA-UE score (26.7%). With respect to the FMA-lower extremity score, CST injury was not related to recovery. Conclusions. Motor recovery of the upper and lower extremities after stroke could be predicted using the initial FMA score. CST injury was significant for the prediction of motor recovery of the upper extremity in patients with severe initial motor deficits (FMA-UE < 35); however, its portion of prediction of motor recovery was low. The prediction of poststroke motor recovery using the initial motor deficit was not improved by the addition of CST injury measurements.

Context: Little is known about how the combination of pain severity and duration affects quadriceps function and self-reported function in patients with anterior knee pain (AKP). Objective: To examine how severity (low [≤3 of 10] versus high [>3 of 10]) and duration (short [2 years]) of AKP affect quadriceps function and self-reported function. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Laboratory. Patients or Other Participants: Sixty patients with AKP (mean pain severity = 4 of 10 on the numeric pain rating scale, mean pain duration = 38 months) and 48 healthy control individuals. Patients with AKP were categorized into 3 subdivisions based on pain: (1) severity (low versus high); (2) duration (short versus long); and (3) severity and duration (low and short versus low and long versus high and short versus high and long). Main Outcome Measure(s): Quadriceps maximal (maximal voluntary isometric contraction) and explosive (rate of torque development) strength, activation (central activation ratio), and endurance (average peak torque) and self-reported function (Lower Extremity Functional Scale score). Results: Compared with the healthy control group, (1) all AKP subgroups showed less quadriceps maximal strength (P < .005, d ≥ 0.78) and activation (P < .02, d ≥ 0.85), except for the AKP subgroup with low severity and short duration of pain (P > .32); (2) AKP subgroups with either high severity or long duration of pain showed less quadriceps explosive strength (P < .007, d ≥ 0.74) and endurance (P < .003, d ≥ 0.79), but when severity and duration were combined, only the AKP subgroup with high severity and long duration of pain showed less quadriceps explosive strength (P = .006, d = 1.09) and endurance (P = .0004, d = 1.21); and (3) all AKP subgroups showed less self-reported function (P < .0001, d ≥ 3.44). Conclusions: Clinicians should be aware of the combined effect of severity and duration of pain and incorporate both factors into clinical practice when rehabilitating patients with AKP.

Background: Little is known about how chronic unilateral anterior knee pain (AKP) affects bilateral quadriceps function and lower quarter flexibility. Objective: To determine if patients with chronic unilateral AKP present bilateral deficits in quadriceps function and lower quarter flexibility. Methods: Twenty-two patients with chronic unilateral AKP (pain duration: 48.6 months) and 22 matched healthy controls were evaluated. Pain perception and functional outcomes were obtained. Knee joint and thigh circumferences, quadriceps subcutaneous tissue thickness and function (i.e. maximal and explosive strength, activation, and endurance), and lower quarter flexibility (i.e. hamstrings and iliopsoas/rectus femoris muscle) in both legs were compared across conditions. Results: Knee joint and thigh circumferences, and quadriceps subcutaneous tissue thickness were not different between conditions (P ≥ .39). Compared with matched healthy controls, patients with chronic unilateral AKP showed: 1) greater pain perception (0.0 versus 4.4 cm, P < .0001); 2) a lower score for functional outcomes (79.6 versus 53.9, P < .0001); 3) less bilateral quadriceps maximal (3.5 versus 2.8 Nm/kg, P < .0001) and explosive (10.8 versus 8.7 Nm/kg/s, P = .01) strength, activation (0.95 versus 0.83, P < .0001), and endurance (1.66 versus 1.52 Nm/kg, P = .02); and 4) less bilateral hamstrings (86.8 versus 72.6°, P = .002) and iliopsoas/rectus femoris (11.6 versus 7.8°, P < .05) flexibility. Conclusion: Patients with chronic unilateral AKP (without knee joint effusion or quadriceps muscle atrophy) appear to have bilateral deficits in quadriceps function and lower quarter flexibility, which should be addressed with pain reduction.