Background. The prediction of motor recovery after stroke is an important issue, and various prediction models have been proposed using either clinical behavioral or neurological biomarkers. This study sought to identify the effects of clinical behavioral biomarkers combined with corticospinal tract (CST) injury measurement on the prediction of motor recovery after stroke. Methods. The region of interest was drawn on the normalized brain magnetic resonance imaging scans of patients with first-ever unilateral hemispheric stroke, and the degree of CST injury was calculated in a total of 67 such subjects. Patients who had initial minor deficits and showed a ceiling effect on motor recovery were excluded. To predict the follow-up Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA) scores, correlation and regression analyses were performed using various clinical behavioral biomarkers, including age, sex, lesion location, and initial FMA scores and CST injury measurements. Results. Only the initial FMA-upper extremity (UE) score was statistically correlated with the follow-up FMA-UE score at ≥2 months after the onset (adjusted ), and the relationship between CST injury and follow-up FMA-UE score was unclear ( ). Hierarchical clustering between the initial and follow-up FMA-UE scores showed three clusters. After exclusion of a cluster with an initial FMA-UE ≥ 35, the prediction of the follow-up FMA-UE score was possible by incorporating the initial FMA-UE score and CST injury measurements ( ). However, the explanatory power decreased (adjusted ), and the unique contribution of the CST injury (10.1%) was lower than that of the initial FMA-UE score (26.7%). With respect to the FMA-lower extremity score, CST injury was not related to recovery. Conclusions. Motor recovery of the upper and lower extremities after stroke could be predicted using the initial FMA score. CST injury was significant for the prediction of motor recovery of the upper extremity in patients with severe initial motor deficits (FMA-UE < 35); however, its portion of prediction of motor recovery was low. The prediction of poststroke motor recovery using the initial motor deficit was not improved by the addition of CST injury measurements.

To compare the effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) and high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on spinal cord injury-related neuropathic pain with sham controls, using neuropathic pain-specific evaluation tools. A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial. Rehabilitation medicine department of a university hospital. Thirty-three patients with spinal cord injury-related neuropathic pain. Patients were randomly allocated to one of three groups (real iTBS, real rTMS, and sham rTMS). Each patient underwent five sessions of assigned stimulation. Before and after completion of the five sessions, patients were evaluated using the self-completed Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs, Numeric Rating Scale, Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory, and Neuropathic Pain Scale. Real iTBS and real rTMS reduced pain levels after stimulation according to all the evaluation tools, and the changes were significant when compared to the values of the sham rTMS group. No significant differences were found between the real iTBS and real rTMS groups. Both iTBS and rTMS were effective in reducing spinal cord injury-related neuropathic pain. When safety, convenience, and compliance are considered, iTBS would have an advantage over rTMS in clinical situations with spinal cord injury-related neuropathic pain.Trial Registration: This trial was registered with the Clinical Research Information Service (registration no. KCT0004976).

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to the pharyngeal motor cortex has shown beneficial effects on poststroke dysphagia. Previous studies, however, using intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) for dysphagia have targeted the suprahyoid motor cortex. This study aimed to investigate the effects of iTBS to the pharyngeal motor cortex in patients with poststroke dysphagia, using ultrasound and videofluoroscopic swallowing studies (VFSS). A randomized controlled trial was conducted on patients with dysphagia due to a first-time unilateral stroke. Patients who had signs and symptoms of dysphagia and showed aspiration or penetration on VFSS were included. Twenty-eight patients were randomly assigned to either real or sham iTBS groups, and each patient underwent five sessions of iTBS to the ipsilesional pharyngeal motor cortex. Each iTBS session was followed by conventional dysphagia treatment for 30 min. The hyoid–larynx approximation measured by ultrasound, penetration–aspiration scale (PAS) and functional dysphagia scale (FDS) assessed by VFSS were evaluated before and after completion of iTBS. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of demographic and clinical characteristics, including age and type of stroke. The hyoid–larynx approximation ratio increased in the real iTBS group and decreased in the sham iTBS group (median values of pre–post differences were 0.27 vs. −0.01, P < 0.001). The PAS and FDS showed greater improvements in the real iTBS group than in the sham iTBS group (median values of pre–post differences of the PAS were −2.50 vs. 0.00, P = 0.004; median values of pre–post differences of the FDS were −12.50 vs. −2.50, P < 0.001). No adverse effects were reported during or after iTBS sessions. Five-session iTBS to the pharyngeal motor cortex combined with conventional treatment led to a significant improvement in poststroke dysphagia in terms of hyoid–larynx approximation which is related to the suprahyoid muscle. Considering the short duration of one iTBS session, this can be an efficient and effective treatment tool for patients with this condition.

Cho AR, et al. Ann Rehabil Med. 2016 Jun;40(3):540-544. http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.2016.40.3.540

Overuse of the nonparetic upper extremity can lead to entrapment neuropathies in chronic stroke patients. However, little is known about the effects of cane use in subacute stage of stroke. The aim of this study was to investigate the short-term effects of cane use on the upper extremity nerves in subacute stroke patients recovering from a bedridden state. Thirty subacute hemiparetic stroke patients who were initially bedridden participated when they were able to walk with a cane. Symptoms and signs related to the median or ulnar nerves were checked, and nerve conduction studies were performed. The largest cross-sectional area (CSA) of these nerves from the wrist to elbow was measured with ultrasound. After 3 weeks of cane use, electrophysiologic and ultrasonographic reevaluation was performed. Nerve conduction studies and CSA of the nerves at the nonparetic upper extremity showed significant changes, whereas those of the hemiparetic upper extremity did not. Walking with a cane for a short period can induce the enlargement of the median and ulnar nerves at the nonparetic extremity of subacute hemiparetic stroke patients. Attention should be placed on correct cane usage from the beginning of rehabilitation.

The purposes of this study were to compare poststroke liquid swallowing methods by including a cup and a straw in videofluoroscopic swallowing studies (VFSS) and to test the hypothesis that increased aspiration would be observed with the cup compared to the straw. Eighty-five poststroke patients who had undergone VFSS using a spoon, cup, and straw were included. Penetration-aspiration scale and functional dysphagia scale (FDS) were used for assessment. These scores did not differ significantly between the cup and the straw. Higher FDS scores were found with the cup than with the straw in patients who had penetration/aspiration with both the cup and the straw and with the cup only. However, FDS scores did not differ significantly between the cup and the straw in patients who had penetration/aspiration with the straw only. Although advantages of the straw over the cup were clear, some patients showed penetration/aspiration only with the straw.