Parental behavior is one of the most influential factors on the development of adolescent externalizing and internalizing behavior problems. These behavioral problems are closely related and often co-occur. The objectives of this work were: (i) to identify adolescents profiles according to their behavior problems; (ii) to explore individual, family, and social characteristics associated with these profiles; and (iii) to analyze the potential role of parenting styles in belonging to adolescents’ profiles. A total of 449 Spanish adolescents (223 from families declared at-risk and enrolled in Child Welfare Services and 226 from families from the general population) participated in this study. The analyses revealed three profiles of adolescents based on external and internal behavior problems (adjusted, external maladjustment, and internal maladjustment). Parenting styles explained the adolescents’ belonging to different profiles, in which the indulgent style was the most favorable in general terms. The distinctive role of parenting styles on two types of maladjustment profiles was confirmed. The relationship between parenting styles and adolescent adjustment is a key component that should be included in interventions according to adolescents’ behavior problem profiles. Furthermore, the results shed light on the need that family interventions are complemented with individualized interventions with adolescents that accumulate stressful life events.

Negative stereotypes towards ageing and the old age may negatively influence relationships and working with older people. The CENVE (Negative Stereotypes Towards Ageing) questionnaire is a validated Spanish tool designed to evaluate these stereotypes, but there are no evidence about its factorial structure with young people and adults. This factorial structure of CENVE is analysed in non-elderly subjects, and its relationship with various sociodemographic and experience-related indicators is also examined. A total of 350 young people and adults completed the CENVE. Information on demographics, specialised academic training in aging, and level of contact with elderly people were also provided. An analysis was performed on the factorial structure of the questionnaire and its relationship with socio-demographic and experiential indicators. The analyses performed did not confirm the original structure in 3 sub-scales, suggesting an alternative one-dimensional structure. It also suggested the existence of different ageist stereotypes associated with the socio-demographic profile of non-elderly subjects (particularly related to educational level). Less conclusive results were obtained regarding former experience and level of information on aging. CENVE is a useful tool for evaluating ageism, but in the present article a one-dimensional correction is suggested for the non-elderly population.

ResumenA partir de la revisión de algunos de los estudios y de las investigaciones que se han realizado en nuestro país en los últimos años, en este artículo se lleva a cabo una síntesis de los principales indicadores del fenómeno de los malos tratos a mujeres a manos de sus parejas o ex-parejas en España en cuanto a su frecuencia, prevalencia y desarrollo. Asimismo, se revisan las principales características de los protagonistas de este grave problema social: las víctimas (directas e indirectas), los agresores y el contexto social y profesional en el que tiene lugar este fenómeno. La revisión efectuada permite concluir que la violencia de pareja que sufren las mujeres constituye un grave problema social que afecta a un colectivo importante de personas en nuestro país y que se trata de un fenómeno muy heterogéneo y universal sobre todo en cuanto al perfil de las víctimas. No obstante, las evidencias disponibles reflejan un perfil más homogéneo respecto al curso y desarrollo de los episodios violentos. Vistos en su conjunto, los indicadores disponibles sobre los malos tratos a mujeres en España invitan a poner en duda y rebatir muchos de los prejuicios que existen respecto a este problema.AbstractAfter a literature review of recent studies on partner violence against women in Spain, this paper describes the central indicators of frequency, prevalence and course of domestic abuse. The main characteristics of battered women, their children, the male aggressors, and the social and professional context in which these actions take place are summarized. Partner violence against women in Spain appears to be a serious social problem affecting a significant number of people. It is also a very heterogeneous and widespread phenomenon particularly with respect to female victims’ characteristics. However, studies offer a more homogenous profile of the course of domestic violence against women. As a whole, available indicators of domestic violence against women in Spain led us to cast some doubt and refute many of the prejudices about this subject

Resumen Este estudio tuvo como objetivo examinar las relaciones entre el bienestar psicológico, la autoeficacia para envejecer y la autoestima en personas mayores de 60 años no dependientes. Han participado 148 personas con edades comprendidas entre 60 y 96 años, completando una batería de instrumentos relacionados con la autonomía, el grado y tipo de actividad, la autoeficacia para afrontar el proceso de envejecimiento, la autoestima y el bienestar psicológico. Los resultados indican que el bienestar psicológico no está asociado con la edad, sino con un conjunto de factores de corte psicológico. En concreto la percepción de la salud, las actividades físico-deportivas, la autoeficacia para envejecer, la autoestima y la autonomía se relacionan con el bienestar psicológico, aunque sólo los tres últimos indicadores lo explican. Por tanto la autoeficacia y la autoestima funcionan como promotores del bienestar físico, psicológico y social, de manera que resulta fundamental motivar la participación de los mayores en actividades físico-deportivas, recreativas, sociales y cognitivas promoviendo así su bienestar.

Background: The Parenting Stress Index Short Form (PSI-SF) is a widely used instrument in scientific literature to evaluate the levels of stress a parent feels when facing parenting-related tasks. Despite the potential usefulness of the PSI-SF with at-risk families, no validation studies have been carried out on this population in Spain. Objectives: The main objective of this study is to report evidences of the reliability and validity of PSI-SF with a sample of at-risk mothers. Specifically, (1) to examine the discriminative capacity of PSI-SF to differentiate between a community sample and another sample composed of families with various levels of risk and (2) to analyze the relationships with general health indicators and parental sense of competence. Results: Analyses reported in this article show satisfactory results regarding appropriate internal consistency coefficients for the scale. With respect to the evidences of validity, results reported here suggest that the total PSI-SF score, but not the two subscales, could be useful to differentiate between different groups of mothers with different levels of risk. The Childrearing stress subscale was associated with a poorer perception as a mother as well as with an external locus of control, and the Personal distress subscale was related to all the general health indicators, explaining a high percentage of variance. Conclusion: The results reported show that the total score or the subscales should be used in a differentiated way according to the professional’s objectives. Hence, PSI-SF may be a useful instrument for researchers and practitioners who work with at-risk families.