Objective. To prospectively evaluate current demographics, distribution and severity of rock climbing-related injuries after the sport’s inclusion into the Olympic program and to analyze changes in comparison to two prior study populations. Methods. In 2017-2018, we performed a single-center injury survey including 436 climbing patients with a total number of 633 independent climbing-related injuries or complaints. Results. 77.1% of the injuries affected the upper extremities, 17.7% the lower and 5.2% other body regions. Injury severity was overall low (Union Internationale des Associations d’Alpinisme (UIAA) metric scale: 1.8 ± 1 (1-4)). The most frequent injuries were finger pulley injuries (12.3%) and finger tenosynovitis (10.6%). 43.9% of reported injuries were acute and 56.1% were chronic. Bouldering accidents were the leading cause of acute injuries (60.4%). Among shoulder injuries, superior labral lesion tears from anterior to posterior (SLAP) represented the leading diagnosis (29.8%). In comparison to our two prior study populations (1998-2001 and 2009-2012), we found: 1) an overall decrease in upper extremity injuries, 2) an increase of lower extremity injuries, 3) a constant decrease of finger pulley injuries and epicondylitis, 4) a rise of knee injuries and shoulder dislocations, 5) an increase of adolescents finger growth plate injuries. Conclusions. Severity of climbing injuries is low overall. Distinct trends are noticeable: being that some injury rates rose while others fell, preventative strategies only seem partially effective. Therefore, adjustment of preventive strategies is required.

Intervertebral disc degeneration is considered a major source of low back pain. We therefore examined an absorbable polyglycolic acid (PGA) biomaterial for its utility to support disc tissue regeneration. Microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation was performed in six patients. Intervertebral disc cells were isolated and in vitro cell expansion was accomplished using human serum and FGF2. In a fibrin–hyaluronan solution, disc cells were loaded on PGA scaffolds and cultured for 2 weeks. Formation of disc tissue was documented by histological staining of the extracellular matrix as well as gene expression analysis of typical disc marker genes. The use of human serum and FGF2 ensures efficient isolation and expansion of human disc cells. During this phase, dedifferentiation of the disc cells was observed. Subsequent 3D tissue culture of disc cells in PGA scaffolds, however, is accompanied by the induction of typical disc marker genes, resulting in tissue containing glycosaminoglycans and collagens. Propidium iodide/fluorescein diacetate (PI/FDA) staining documented that 3D assembly of disc cells in PGA scaffolds allows prolonged culture and high viability of disc cells. Disc cells from tissue of the nucleus compartment can be reliably isolated and expanded in vitro with FGF. In combination with a fibrin–hyaluronan solution and loaded on a PGA scaffold, disc cells from expansion culture commence a redifferentiation process. PGA-based scaffolds could be useful as temporal matrices for regenerative disc repair approaches. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The treatment of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI), and especially of re-infections, poses a highly complex problem in orthopaedic surgery. While fungal infections are rare, they present a special challenge. The therapy is often protracted and based on limited evidence. A total of 510 hip and knee revision surgeries were analysed for the occurrence of bacterial and fungal PJI. In patients with PJI, the duration of the hospital stay and the incidence of disarticulation of the infected joint were recorded. Out of the analysed revision arthroplasties, 43.5% were due to PJI. Monomicrobial infection occurred in 55.2%, dual microbial infection in 21.4%, and polymicrobial (≥3 different bacterial or fungal species) infection in 17.2% of the cases. Overall, Candida species were detected in 12.4% cases. Candida albicans was the main fungal pathogen. In 6.9% of cases, disarticulation of the joint was the only option to control PJI. The detection of polymicrobial infection more than doubled in follow-up revisions and there was a strong association between detection of Candida infection and disarticulation (OR 9.39). The majority of fungal infections were mixed infections of bacteria and Candida albicans. The choice of a biofilm penetrating antimycotic, e.g., caspofungin, together with a sufficient standard procedure for detection and surgical treatment can help to control the infection situation. Fungal infection often proves to be more difficult to treat than anticipated and is more frequent than expected.

Background: The periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a severe complication in the field of arthroplasty. Despite the rising number of primary joint replacements, no unified therapeutic standard has been established for the treatment of PJI yet. Methods: A survey on the principles of treatment of PJI in Germany was conducted. A total of 515 EndoProthetikZentren (EPZ) were included, resulting in a response rate of 100%. Results: For early infections 97.6% of the centers use prosthesis-preserving procedures (DAIR). A one-stage exchange was implemented by less than 50% of the centers. If implemented, this treatment entails a prior selection of patients for a successful treatment. The two-stage exchange is performed in all centers, and most centers proceed with the implantation of a cemented spacer between stages. 75% of the centers proceed with a center-based concept for the treatment of PJI. Conclusion: The aim of a uniform PJI standard at the centers has not yet been fully achieved. Further improvements within the certification were initiated. The most relevant treatment options in Germany are displayed. The two-stage revision with a cemented spacer is the most widely implemented treatment. This exposition of principles could help for the further development of standardized treatment guidelines and definitions.

Background: The diagnosis of low-grade infections of endoprostheses is challenging. There are still no unified guidelines for standardised diagnostic approaches, recommendations are categorised into major and minor criteria. Additional histopathological samples might sustain the diagnosis. However, ambulatory preoperative biopsy collection is not widespread. Method: 102 patients with hip or knee endoprosthesis and suspected periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) were examined by arthrocentesis with microbiological sample and histopathological punch biopsy. The data were retrospectively analysed for diagnosis concordance. Results: Preoperative microbiology compared to intraoperative results was positive in 51.9% (sensitivity 51.9%, specificity 97.3%). In comparison of preoperative biopsy to intraoperative diagnostic results 51.9% cases were positive (sensitivity 51.9%, specificity 100.0%). The combination of preoperative biopsy and microbiology in comparison to intraoperative results was positive in 70.4% of the cases (sensitivity 70.4%, specificity 97.3%). Conclusion: The diagnosis of PJI is complex. One single method to reliably detect an infection is currently not available. With the present method histopathological samples might be obtained quickly, easily and safely for the preoperative detection of PJI. A combination of microbiological and histopathological sampling increases the sensitivity up to 18.5% to detect periprosthetic infection.