Eric Decker

Dr. Eric Decker

Department of Food Science, University of Massachusetts, Chenoweth Laboratory, Amherst, MA 01003, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

41Years (1986-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 May 2008 in Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Ryan EliasRyan Elias
Ryan Elias
SKSarah S. Kellerby
Sarah S. Kellerby
Eric DeckerEric Decker
Eric Decker
Proteins can inhibit lipid oxidation by biologically designed mechanisms (e.g. antioxidant enzymes and iron-binding proteins) or by nonspecific mechanisms. Both of these types of antioxidative proteins contribute to the endogenous antioxidant capacity of foods. Proteins also have excellent potential as antioxidant additives in foods because they can inhibit lipid oxidation through multiple pathways including inactivation of reactive oxygen species, scavenging free radicals, chelation of prooxidative transition metals, reduction of hydroperoxides, and alteration of the physical properties of food systems. A protein's overall antioxidant activity can be increased by disruption of its tertiary structure to increase the solvent accessibility of amino acid residues that can scavenge free radicals and chelate prooxidative metals. The production of peptides through hydrolytic reactions seems to be the most promising technique to form proteinaceous antioxidants since peptides have substantially higher antioxidant activity than intact proteins. While proteins and peptides have excellent potential as food antioxidants, issues such as allergenicity and bitter off-flavors as well as their ability to alter food texture and color need to be addressed.


1 March 1990 in Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Eric DeckerEric Decker
Eric Decker
BWBarbara Welch
Barbara Welch

10 October 2007 in Journal of Food Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
David Julian McClementsDavid Julian McClements
David Julian McClements
Eric DeckerEric Decker
Eric Decker
JWJ. Weiss
J. Weiss
ABSTRACT:  There is a pressing need for edible delivery systems to encapsulate, protect, and release bioactive lipids within the food, medical, and pharmaceutical industries. The fact that these delivery systems must be edible puts constraints on the type of ingredients and processing operations that can be used to create them. Emulsion technology is particularly suited for the design and fabrication of delivery systems for encapsulating bioactive lipids. This review provides a brief overview of the major bioactive lipids that need to be delivered within the food industry (for example, ω‐3 fatty acids, carotenoids, and phytosterols), highlighting the main challenges to their current incorporation into foods. We then provide an overview of a number of emulsion‐based technologies that could be used as edible delivery systems by the food and other industries, including conventional emulsions, multiple emulsions, multilayer emulsions, solid lipid particles, and filled hydrogel particles. Each of these delivery systems could be produced from food‐grade (GRAS) ingredients (for example, lipids, proteins, polysaccharides, surfactants, and minerals) using simple processing operations (for example, mixing, homogenizing, and thermal processing). For each type of delivery system, we describe its structure, preparation, advantages, limitations, and potential applications. This knowledge can be used to facilitate the selection of the most appropriate emulsion‐based delivery system for specific applications.

28 May 2009 in Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
David Julian McClementsDavid Julian McClements
David Julian McClements
Eric DeckerEric Decker
Eric Decker
YPYeonhwa Park
Yeonhwa Park
JWJochen Weiss
Jochen Weiss
There have been major advances in the design and fabrication of structured delivery systems for the encapsulation of nutraceutical and functional food components. A wide variety of delivery systems is now available, each with its own advantages and disadvantages for particular applications. This review begins by discussing some of the major nutraceutical and functional food components that need to be delivered and highlights the main limitations to their current utilization within the food industry. It then discusses the principles underpinning the rational design of structured delivery systems: the structural characteristics of the building blocks; the nature of the forces holding these building blocks together; and, the different ways of assembling these building blocks into structured delivery systems. Finally, we review the major types of structured delivery systems that are currently available to food scientists: lipid-based (simple, multiple, multilayer, and solid lipid particle emulsions); surfactant-based (simple micelles, mixed micelles, vesicles, and microemulsions) and biopolymer-based (soluble complexes, coacervates, hydrogel droplets, and particles). For each type of delivery system we describe its preparation, properties, advantages, and limitations.

1 March 2011 in Food Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SHSun Jin Hur
Sun Jin Hur
BLBeong Ou Lim
Beong Ou Lim
Eric DeckerEric Decker
Eric Decker
David Julian McClementsDavid Julian McClements
David Julian McClements