Stefan Zerbe

Prof. Stefan Zerbe

Faculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Bozen, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2013 in Environmental Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Stefan ZerbeStefan Zerbe
Stefan Zerbe
PSPeggy Steffenhagen
Peggy Steffenhagen
KPKarsten Parakenings
Karsten Parakenings
TTTiemo Timmermann
Tiemo Timmermann
AFAnnett Frick
Annett Frick
DZDominik Zak
Dominik Zak

31 May 2018 in Journal of Applied Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Andrew SpeakAndrew Speak
Andrew Speak
Francisco J EscobedoFrancisco J Escobedo
Francisco J Escobedo
Alessio RussoAlessio Russo
Alessio Russo
Stefan ZerbeStefan Zerbe
Stefan Zerbe

29 July 2014 in SpringerPlus
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SCSonia Ciccazzo
Sonia Ciccazzo
AEAlfonso Esposito
Alfonso Esposito
EREleonora Rolli
Eleonora Rolli
Stefan ZerbeStefan Zerbe
Stefan Zerbe
DDDaniele Daffonchio
Daniele Daffonchio
Lorenzo BrusettiLorenzo Brusetti
Lorenzo Brusetti
The rhizobacterial communities of 29 pioneer plants belonging to 12 species were investigated in an alpine ecosystem to assess if plants from different species could select for specific rhizobacterial communities. Rhizospheres and unvegetated soils were collected from a floristic pioneer stage plot at 2,400 m a.s.l. in the forefield of Weisskugel Glacier (Matsch Valley, South Tyrol, Italy), after 160 years of glacier retreat. To allow for a culture-independent perspective, total environmental DNA was extracted from both rhizosphere and bare soil samples and analyzed by Automated Ribosomal Intergenic Spacer Analysis (ARISA) and Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (DGGE). ARISA fingerprinting showed that rhizobacterial genetic structure was extremely different from bare soil bacterial communities while rhizobacterial communities clustered strictly together according to the plant species. Sequencing of DGGE bands showed that rhizobacterial communities were mainly composed of Acidobacteria and Proteobacteria whereas bare soil was colonized by Acidobacteria and Clostridia. UniFrac significance calculated on DGGE results confirmed the rhizosphere effect exerted by the 12 species and showed different bacterial communities (P < 0.05) associated with all the plant species. These results pointed out that specific rhizobacterial communities were selected by pioneer plants of different species in a high mountain ecosystem characterized by oligotrophic and harsh environmental conditions, during an early primary succession.

30 October 2013 in Annals of Forest Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ARAnna Radtke
Anna Radtke
DTDavid Toe
David Toe
FBFrederic Berger
Frederic Berger
Stefan ZerbeStefan Zerbe
Stefan Zerbe
FBFranck Bourrier
Franck Bourrier

8 December 2023 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AVAnna M. Visscher
Anna M. Visscher
PMPaula Meli
Paula Meli
SFSteven Fonte
Steven Fonte
GBGianmaria Bonari
Gianmaria Bonari
Stefan ZerbeStefan Zerbe
Stefan Zerbe
CWCamilla Wellstein
Camilla Wellstein
Mountain agroecosystems in Latin America provide multiple ecosystem functions (EFs) and products from global to local scales, particularly for the rural communities who depend on them. Agroforestry has been proposed as a climate‐smart farming strategy throughout much of the region to help conserve biodiversity and enhance multiple EFs, especially in mountainous regions. However, large‐scale synthesis on the potential of agroforestry across Latin America is lacking. To understand the potential impacts of agroforestry at the continental level, we conducted a meta‐analysis examining the effects of agroforestry on biological activity and diversity (BIAD) and multiple EFs across mountain agroecosystems of Latin America. A total of 78 studies were selected based on a formalized literature search in the Web of Science. We analysed differences between (i) silvoarable systems versus cropland, (ii) silvopastoral systems versus pastureland, and (iii) agroforestry versus forest systems, based on response ratios. Response ratios were further used to understand how climate type, precipitation and soil properties (texture) influence key EFs (carbon sequestration, nutrient provision, erosion control, yield production) and BIAD in agroforestry systems. Results revealed that BIAD and EFs related to carbon sequestration and nutrient provisioning were generally higher in agroforestry systems (silvopastoral and silvoarable) compared to croplands and pasturelands without trees. However, the impacts of agroforestry systems on crop yields varied depending on the system considered (i.e., coffee vs. cereals), while forest systems generally provided greater levels of BIAD and EFs than agroforestry systems. Further analysis demonstrated that the impacts of agroforestry systems on BIAD and EFs depend greatly on climate type, soil, and precipitation. For example, silvoarable systems appear to generate the greatest benefits in arid or tropical climates, on sandier soils, and under lower precipitation regimes. Overall, our findings highlight the widespread potential of agroforestry systems to BIAD and multiple EFs across montane regions of Latin America.