This paper presents a two-dimensional implementation of the high-order penalized vortex in cell method applied to solve the flow past an airfoil with a vortex trapping cavity operating under moderate Reynolds number. The purpose of this article is to investigate the fundamentals of the vortex trapping cavity. The first part of the paper treats with the numerical implementation of the method and high-order schemes incorporated into the algorithm. Poisson, stream-velocity, advection, and diffusion equations were solved. The derivation, finite difference formulation, Lagrangian particle remeshing procedure, and accuracy tests were shown. Flow past complex geometries was possible through the penalization method. A procedure description for preparing geometry data was included. The entire methodology was tested with flow past impulsively started cylinder for three Reynolds numbers: 550, 3000, 9500. Drag coefficient, streamlines, and vorticity contours were checked against results obtained by other authors. Afterwards, simulations and experimental results are presented for a standard airfoil and those equipped with a trapping vortex cavity. Airfoil with an optimized cavity shape was tested under three angles of attack: 3°, 6°, 9°. The Reynolds number is equal to Re = 2 × 10⁴. Apart from performing flow analysis, drag and lift coefficients for different shapes were measured to assess the effect of vortex trapping cavity on aerodynamic performance. Flow patterns were compared against ultraviolet dye visualizations obtained from the water tunnel experiment.

In recent years, morphing wings have become not only a concept, but an aerodynamic solution for the aviation industry to take a step forward toward future technologies. However, continuously morphing airfoils became an interesting answer to provide green energy solutions. In this paper, the authors conducted experimental research on a continuously camber-morphing airfoil using the Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) and Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) methods. The main objective of this work was to research a variety of morphing airfoils with different camber deflections. An average velocity distribution and turbulence distribution were compared and are discussed. The two-dimensional PIV results were compared to the CFD simulations to validate the numerical method’s accuracy and obtain the aerodynamic coefficient’s trends. A further comparison revealed that morphing airfoils have better aerodynamic performance than conventional airfoils for very low camber deflections and create substantial amounts of drag for significant camber deflections.

Thrust vector control (TVC) might be used to control aircraft at large altitudes and in post-stall conditions when aerodynamic control surfaces are ineffective. This study demonstrated that the implementation of the TVC on high-speed aircraft is a reasonable solution and might be an alternative when compared to the complicated reaction control system or large aerodynamic control surfaces. The numerical flight dynamics model of the X-15 experimental aircraft was developed and implemented in MATLAB/Simulink and then used to investigate the proposed solution. The obtained results indicate that the aircraft, equipped with full 3D thrust vectoring and two independent horizontal stabilizers to control the roll angle, was able to achieve flight along the path that was defined by a set of waypoints. This paper also highlights the potential benefits and challenges of using TVC as a control method for aircraft. The results of this study contribute to the growing body of research on aircraft control and simulation. Future work can explore the use of TVC for other aircraft with unique configurations and low maneuverability features.

Experimental quantitative (local velocity measurements by Laser Doppler Anemometry) and qualitative researches (visualization by dye marker) of flow around a bridge pillar model for the Reynolds number Re _D in the range of 40 up to 350 (for laminar, transitional and turbulent flow) were conducted. Re _D was the Reynolds number referred to the diameter of the model (cylinder), D = 14.65 mm.