Goulven G. Laruelle

Dr. Goulven G. Laruelle


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 July 2020 in Earth System Science Data
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MSMarielle Saunois
Marielle Saunois
ASAnn R. Stavert
Ann R. Stavert
Benjamin PoulterBenjamin Poulter
Benjamin Poulter
PBPhilippe Bousquet
Philippe Bousquet
JCJosep G. Canadell
Josep G. Canadell
Qianlai ZhuangQianlai Zhuang
Qianlai Zhuang
Understanding and quantifying the global methane (CH4) budget is important for assessing realistic pathways to mitigate climate change. Atmospheric emissions and concentrations of CH4 continue to increase, making CH4 the second most important human-influenced greenhouse gas in terms of climate forcing, after carbon dioxide (CO2). The relative importance of CH4 compared to CO2 depends on its shorter atmospheric lifetime, stronger warming potential, and variations in atmospheric growth rate over the past decade, the causes of which are still debated. Two major challenges in reducing uncertainties in the atmospheric growth rate arise from the variety of geographically overlapping CH4 sources and from the destruction of CH4 by short-lived hydroxyl radicals (OH). To address these challenges, we have established a consortium of multidisciplinary scientists under the umbrella of the Global Carbon Project to synthesize and stimulate new research aimed at improving and regularly updating the global methane budget. Following Saunois et al. (2016), we present here the second version of the living review paper dedicated to the decadal methane budget, integrating results of top-down studies (atmospheric observations within an atmospheric inverse-modelling framework) and bottom-up estimates (including process-based models for estimating land surface emissions and atmospheric chemistry, inventories of anthropogenic emissions, and data-driven extrapolations). For the 2008–2017 decade, global methane emissions are estimated by atmospheric inversions (a top-down approach) to be 576 Tg CH4 yr−1 (range 550–594, corresponding to the minimum and maximum estimates of the model ensemble). Of this total, 359 Tg CH4 yr−1 or ∼ 60 % is attributed to anthropogenic sources, that is emissions caused by direct human activity (i.e. anthropogenic emissions; range 336–376 Tg CH4 yr−1 or 50 %–65 %). The mean annual total emission for the new decade (2008–2017) is 29 Tg CH4 yr−1 larger than our estimate for the previous decade (2000–2009), and 24 Tg CH4 yr−1 larger than the one reported in the previous budget for 2003–2012 (Saunois et al., 2016). Since 2012, global CH4 emissions have been tracking the warmest scenarios assessed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Bottom-up methods suggest almost 30 % larger global emissions (737 Tg CH4 yr−1, range 594–881) than top-down inversion methods. Indeed, bottom-up estimates for natural sources such as natural wetlands, other inland water systems, and geological sources are higher than top-down estimates. The atmospheric constraints on the top-down budget suggest that at least some of these bottom-up emissions are overestimated. The latitudinal distribution of atmospheric observation-based emissions indicates a predominance of tropical emissions (∼ 65 % of the global budget, < 30∘ N) compared to mid-latitudes (∼ 30 %, 30–60∘ N) and high northern latitudes (∼ 4 %, 60–90∘ N). The most important source of uncertainty in the methane budget is attributable to natural emissions, especially those from wetlands and other inland waters. Some of our global source estimates are smaller than those in previously published budgets (Saunois et al., 2016; Kirschke et al., 2013). In particular wetland emissions are about 35 Tg CH4 yr−1 lower due to improved partition wetlands and other inland waters. Emissions from geological sources and wild animals are also found to be smaller by 7 Tg CH4 yr−1 by 8 Tg CH4 yr−1, respectively. However, the overall discrepancy between bottom-up and top-down estimates has been reduced by only 5 % compared to Saunois et al. (2016), due to a higher estimate of emissions from inland waters, highlighting the need for more detailed research on emissions factors. Priorities for improving the methane budget include (i) a global, high-resolution map of water-saturated soils and inundated areas emitting methane based on a robust classification of different types of emitting habitats; (ii) further development of process-based models for inland-water emissions; (iii) intensification of methane observations at local scales (e.g., FLUXNET-CH4 measurements) and urban-scale monitoring to constrain bottom-up land surface models, and at regional scales (surface networks and satellites) to constrain atmospheric inversions; (iv) improvements of transport models and the representation of photochemical sinks in top-down inversions; and (v) development of a 3D variational inversion system using isotopic and/or co-emitted species such as ethane to improve source partitioning. The data presented here can be downloaded from https://doi.org/10.18160/GCP-CH4-2019 (Saunois et al., 2020) and from the Global Carbon Project.

7 October 2020 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HTHanqin Tian
Hanqin Tian
RXRongting Xu
Rongting Xu
JCJosep G. Canadell
Josep G. Canadell
RTRona L. Thompson
Rona L. Thompson
WWWilfried Winiwarter
Wilfried Winiwarter
YYYuanzhi Yao
Yuanzhi Yao

9 June 2013 in Nature Geoscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PRPierre Regnier
Pierre Regnier
PFPierre Friedlingstein
Pierre Friedlingstein
PCPhilippe Ciais
Philippe Ciais
FMFred T. Mackenzie
Fred T. Mackenzie
NGNicolas Gruber
Nicolas Gruber
MTMartin Thullner
Martin Thullner
A substantial amount of the atmospheric carbon taken up on land through photosynthesis and chemical weathering is transported laterally along the aquatic continuum from upland terrestrial ecosystems to the ocean. So far, global carbon budget estimates have implicitly assumed that the transformation and lateral transport of carbon along this aquatic continuum has remained unchanged since pre-industrial times. A synthesis of published work reveals the magnitude of present-day lateral carbon fluxes from land to ocean, and the extent to which human activities have altered these fluxes. We show that anthropogenic perturbation may have increased the flux of carbon to inland waters by as much as 1.0 Pg C yr−1 since pre-industrial times, mainly owing to enhanced carbon export from soils. Most of this additional carbon input to upstream rivers is either emitted back to the atmosphere as carbon dioxide (~0.4 Pg C yr−1) or sequestered in sediments (~0.5 Pg C yr−1) along the continuum of freshwater bodies, estuaries and coastal waters, leaving only a perturbation carbon input of ~0.1 Pg C yr−1 to the open ocean. According to our analysis, terrestrial ecosystems store ~0.9 Pg C yr−1 at present, which is in agreement with results from forest inventories but significantly differs from the figure of 1.5 Pg C yr−1 previously estimated when ignoring changes in lateral carbon fluxes. We suggest that carbon fluxes along the land–ocean aquatic continuum need to be included in global carbon dioxide budgets.SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

7 April 2015 in Global Biogeochemical Cycles
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RLRonny Lauerwald
Ronny Lauerwald
GLGoulven G. Laruelle
Goulven G. Laruelle
JHJens Hartmann
Jens Hartmann
PCPhilippe Ciais
Philippe Ciais
PRPierre A.G. Regnier
Pierre A.G. Regnier
CO 2 evasion from rivers ( F CO 2 ) is an important component of the global carbon budget. Here we present the first global maps of CO 2 partial pressures ( p CO 2 ) in rivers of stream orders 3 and higher and the resulting F CO 2 at 0.5° resolution constructed with a statistical model. A geographic information system based approach is used to derive a p CO 2 prediction function trained on data from 1182 sampling locations. While data from Asia and Africa are scarce and the training data set is dominated by sampling locations from the Americas, Europe, and Australia, the sampling locations cover the full spectrum from high to low latitudes. The predictors of p CO 2 are net primary production, population density, and slope gradient within the river catchment as well as mean air temperature at the sampling location ( r 2 = 0.47). The predicted p CO 2 map was then combined with spatially explicit estimates of stream surface area A river and gas exchange velocity k calculated from published empirical equations and data sets to derive the F CO 2 map. Using Monte Carlo simulations, we assessed the uncertainties of our estimates. At the global scale, we estimate an average river p CO 2 of 2400 (2019–2826) µatm and a F CO 2 of 650 (483–846) Tg C yr −1 (5th and 95th percentiles of confidence interval). Our global CO 2 evasion is substantially lower than the recent estimate of 1800 Tg C yr −1 although the training set of p CO 2 is very similar in both studies, mainly due to lower tropical p CO 2 estimates in the present study. Our maps reveal strong latitudinal gradients in p CO 2 , A river , and F CO 2 . The zone between 10°N and 10°S contributes about half of the global CO 2 evasion. Collection of p CO 2 data in this zone, in particular, for African and Southeast Asian rivers is a high priority to reduce uncertainty on F CO 2 .

13 August 2010 in Geophysical Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GLGoulven G. Laruelle
Goulven G. Laruelle
HDHans H. Dürr
Hans H. Dürr
CSCaroline P. Slomp
Caroline P. Slomp
ABAlberto Borges
Alberto Borges

1 March 2011 in Estuaries and Coasts
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HDHans H. Dürr
Hans H. Dürr
GLGoulven G. Laruelle
Goulven G. Laruelle
CKCheryl M. van Kempen
Cheryl M. van Kempen
CSCaroline P. Slomp
Caroline P. Slomp
MMMichel Meybeck
Michel Meybeck
HMHans Middelkoop
Hans Middelkoop
We present a spatially explicit global overview of nearshore coastal types, based on hydrological, lithological and morphological criteria. A total of four main operational types act as active filters of both dissolved and suspended material entering the ocean from land: small deltas (type I), tidal systems (II), lagoons (III) and fjords (IV). Large rivers (V) largely bypass the nearshore filter, while karstic (VI) and arheic coasts (VII) act as inactive filters. This typology provides new insight into the spatial distribution and inherent heterogeneity of estuarine filters worldwide. The relative importance of each type at the global scale is calculated and types I, II, III and IV account for 32%, 22%, 8% and 26% of the global coastline, respectively, while 12% have a very limited nearshore coastal filter. As an application of this typology, the global estuarine surface area is re-estimated to 1.1 × 106 km2 instead of 1.4 × 106 km2 in earlier work.