A diverse supply of pollen is an important factor for honey bee health, but information about the pollen diversity available to colonies at the landscape scale is largely missing. In this COLOSS study, beekeeper citizen scientists sampled and analyzed the diversity of pollen collected by honey bee colonies. As a simple measure of diversity, beekeepers determined the number of colors found in pollen samples that were collected in a coordinated and standardized way. Altogether, 750 beekeepers from 28 different regions from 24 countries participated in the two-year study and collected and analyzed almost 18,000 pollen samples. Pollen samples contained approximately six different colors in total throughout the sampling period, of which four colors were abundant. We ran generalized linear mixed models to test for possible effects of diverse factors such as collection, i.e., whether a minimum amount of pollen was collected or not, and habitat type on the number of colors found in pollen samples. To identify habitat effects on pollen diversity, beekeepers’ descriptions of the surrounding landscape and CORINE land cover classes were investigated in two different models, which both showed that both the total number and the rare number of colors in pollen samples were positively affected by ‘urban’ habitats or ‘artificial surfaces’, respectively. This citizen science study underlines the importance of the habitat for pollen diversity for bees and suggests higher diversity in urban areas.

Recent research has highlighted the potential of honeybees and bee products as biological samplers for monitoring xenobiotic pollutants. However, the effectiveness of these biological samplers in tracking microplastics (MPs) has not yet been explored. This study evaluates several methods of sampling MPs, using honeybees, pollen, and a novel in-hive passive sampler named the APITrap. The collected samples were characterized using a stereomicroscopy to count and categorise MPs by morphology, colour, and type. To chemical identification, a micro-Fourier transform-infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy was employed to determine the polymer types. The study was conducted across four consecutive surveillance programmes, in five different apiaries in Denmark. Our findings indicated that APITrap demonstrated better reproducibility, with a lower variation in results of 39%, compared to 111% for honeybee samples and 97% for pollen samples. Furthermore, the use of APITrap has no negative impact on bees and can be easily applied in successive samplings. The average number of MPs detected in the four monitoring studies ranged from 39 to 67 in the APITrap, 6 to 9 in honeybee samples, and 6 to 11 in pollen samples. Fibres were the most frequently found, accounting for an average of 91% of the total MPs detected in the APITrap, and similar values for fragments (5%) and films (4%). The MPs were predominantly coloured black, blue, green and red. Spectroscopy analysis confirmed the presence of up to five different synthetic polymers. Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) was the most common in case of fibres and similarly to polypropylene (PP), polyethylene (PE), polyacrylonitrile (PAN) and polyamide (PA) in non fibrous MPs. This study, based on citizen science and supported by beekeepers, highlights the potential of MPs to accumulate in beehives. It also shows that the APITrap provides a highly reliable and comprehensive approach for sampling in large-scale monitoring studies.

Due to their foraging behavior, honey bees interact with the landscape. As a result, honey bees and their brood will be exposed to pesticides through nectar and pollen entering the hive. Although these pathways seem rather straightforward, there are several steps between the entry of nectar and pollen and its consumption by the colony. One of the aspects involved here is the time between collection and consumption of pollen in the hive. This is of importance for the actual exposure of nurse bees and larvae to pesticides in pollen. Although lab and short-term field studies indicated that bees prefer to consume freshly stored pollen, this has to our knowledge not been verified in a long-term field study under realistic environmental and apiculturist conditions. To study pollen consumption dynamics, influx and consumption were recorded at 3 or 4 day intervals over a six-week period in two colonies. It was demonstrated that throughout the experimental period, beebread consumption was high in the first 3 to 5 days after collection, over which approximately 70% was consumed. The remaining 30% was consumed within a 2 to 3 week period. Pollen consumption is swift and indicates that only limited time is available for potential degradation processes. As actual data on degradation of pesticides in stored pollen are not available, a justified worse case assumption would be that the actual exposure concentrations consumed by the nurse bees and larvae are the same as the concentrations in collected pollen.

As the honey bee and bumble bee may suffer from the same or related microbial pathogens, cross contamination from commercially reared Bombus spp. to honey bees and wild bumble bees and vice versa is a major concern. Honey bee-collected pollen to feed commercially reared Bombus spp. is a potential risk. Nosema spp. is a fungal pathogen in bees. In this study, we developed new quantitative detection tools based on the detection of RNA using a TaqMan-based RT-qPCR for Nosema ceranae and Nosema apis, with extraction controls based on the actin gene of honey bees and bumble bees, respectively. These tools were subsequently applied to study the epidemiology of N. ceranae, a main disease in honey bees. We screened gamma radiation and cold treatment sterilisation for their efficacy to kill N. ceranae spores fed in sugar water and in pollen to honey bees and bumble bees, respectively. N. ceranae infection in adult bumble bees was checked. Spores passing the inter-alimentary track were found but no infection was observed. N. ceranae spores were fed to honey bees. Their presence and multiplication were demonstrated, showing the spores were both viable and infectious. Our results indicate that N. ceranae found in honey bees cannot infect commercially reared bumble bees (Bombus terrestris) and, that gamma radiation effectively kills N. ceranae. The highly specific and sensitive molecular assays developed, were exploited to detect N. ceranae in pollen and faeces, which would allow more comprehensive epidemiological studies on this important pathogen.

Propolis is a resinous natural product produced by honeybees from plant exudates and beeswax. Its complex chemical composition varies significantly with geographical origin and seasonal factors. This study aimed to characterize the chemical composition of propolis samples collected from different regions of Latvia using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS). In total, 47 metabolites were identified, with chemical profiles dominated by phenolic acids and their esters—compounds typical of European propolis. Regional variations reflected differences in local vegetation, and two samples exhibited flavonoid constituents indicative of poplar-type botanical sources. The Daugavpils sample, which showed a particularly rich chemical profile, was further fractionated chromatographically, leading to the isolation of twelve metabolites: 2’,4’,6’-trihydroxy-4-methoxy dihydrochalcone, 2’,6’,4-trihydroxy-4’-methoxy dihydrochalcone, 2’,6’-dihydroxy-4,4’-dimethoxy dihydrochalcone, 2’,6’-dihydroxy-4’-methoxy dihydrochalcone, 2’,4’,6’-trihydroxy dihydrochalcone, palmitic acid, benzyl benzoate, cinnamyl cinnamate, pinostrobin, pinostrobin chalcone, pinocembrin, and pinobanksin. Given the limited prior research on Latvian propolis, this study provides valuable insights into its chemical diversity and the influence of regional flora on its composition.

Dr. Pieter Oomen, born in 1946, a prominent and inspirational scientist in many areas of the biosafety of pesticides, most notably ecotoxicology, regulatory, risk assessment and bioassays, passed away peacefully on 19th of January 2024. His efforts have had a great and long-lasting impact on bee risk assessment and have improved bee protection. While we will miss a very warm and brilliant person; his many contributions to science and our ability to detect and mitigate risks to the environment remain.