Alona Armstrong

Dr. Alona Armstrong

Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2016 in Environmental Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AAAlona Armstrong
Alona Armstrong
NONicholas J Ostle
Nicholas J Ostle
JWJeanette Whitaker
Jeanette Whitaker

28 March 2014 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AAAlona Armstrong
Alona Armstrong
SWSusan Waldron
Susan Waldron
JWJeanette Whitaker
Jeanette Whitaker
NONicholas J. Ostle
Nicholas J. Ostle
Global energy demand is increasing as greenhouse gas driven climate change progresses, making renewable energy sources critical to future sustainable power provision. Land-based wind and solar electricity generation technologies are rapidly expanding, yet our understanding of their operational effects on biological carbon cycling in hosting ecosystems is limited. Wind turbines and photovoltaic panels can significantly change local ground-level climate by a magnitude that could affect the fundamental plant-soil processes that govern carbon dynamics. We believe that understanding the possible effects of changes in ground-level microclimates on these phenomena is crucial to reducing uncertainty of the true renewable energy carbon cost and to maximize beneficial effects. In this Opinions article, we examine the potential for the microclimatic effects of these land-based renewable energy sources to alter plant-soil carbon cycling, hypothesize likely effects and identify critical knowledge gaps for future carbon research.

1 May 2021 in Solar Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
THTara Hooper
Tara Hooper
AAAlona Armstrong
Alona Armstrong
BVBrigitte Vlaswinkel
Brigitte Vlaswinkel

2 October 2020 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ACAlexander Cagle
Alexander Cagle
AAAlona Armstrong
Alona Armstrong
GEGiles Exley
Giles Exley
Steven GrodskySteven Grodsky
Steven Grodsky
JMJordan Macknick
Jordan Macknick
RHRebecca Hernandez
Rebecca Hernandez
Floating photovoltaic solar energy installations (FPVs) represent a new type of water surface use, potentially sparing land needed for agriculture and conservation. However, standardized metrics for the land sparing and resource use efficiencies of FPVs are absent. These metrics are critical to understanding the environmental and ecological impacts that FPVs may potentially exhibit. Here, we compared techno-hydrological and spatial attributes of four FPVs spanning different climatic regimes. Next, we defined and quantified the land sparing and water surface use efficiency (WSUE) of each FPV. Lastly, we coined and calculated the water surface transformation (WST) using generation data at the world’s first FPV (Far Niente Winery, California). The four FPVs spare 59,555 m2 of land and have a mean land sparing ratio of 2.7:1 m2 compared to ground-mounted PVs. Mean direct and total capacity-based WSUE is 94.5 ± 20.1 SD Wm−2 and 35.2 ± 27.4 SD Wm−2, respectively. Direct and total generation-based WST at Far Niente is 9.3 and 13.4 m2 MWh−1 yr−1, respectively; 2.3 times less area than ground-mounted utility-scale PVs. Our results reveal diverse techno-hydrological and spatial attributes of FPVs, the capacity of FPVs to spare land, and the utility of WSUE and WST metrics.

1 April 2016 in Environmental Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AAAlona Armstrong
Alona Armstrong
RBRalph R Burton
Ralph R Burton
SLSusan Lee
Susan Lee
SMStephen Mobbs
Stephen Mobbs
NONicholas Ostle
Nicholas Ostle
JWJeanette Whitaker
Jeanette Whitaker

30 September 2015 in Ecosystems
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AAAlona Armstrong
Alona Armstrong
SWSusan Waldron
Susan Waldron
NONicholas J. Ostle
Nicholas J. Ostle
HRHarriett Richardson
Harriett Richardson
JWJeanette Whitaker
Jeanette Whitaker
Understanding the spatio-temporal variability of controls on peatland carbon (C) cycling is essential to project the effects of future environmental change. While there is understanding of individual drivers of C cycling, the effect of multiple drivers, including interactions, remains poorly understood. Using a spatially and temporally explicit sampling framework, we examined the effects of biotic and abiotic controls on key indicators of peatland functioning: ecosystem respiration (R eco), photosynthesis (P cal), net ecosystem exchange (NEE), methane (CH4) fluxes, and pore water dissolved organic carbon concentration ([DOC]). Measurements were made over 12 months in a blanket peatland hosting a wind farm in Scotland, UK. Overall, we found that (i) season and plant functional type (PFT) explained most variation in R eco and P cal, (ii) PFT and spatial location within the wind farm, which integrates several peat properties, were dominant predictors of CH4 fluxes, and (iii) season and location within the wind farm correlated with pore water [DOC]. Examination of predictors indicated that interactions, between and within biotic and abiotic factors, explained a significant amount of variation in greenhouse gas fluxes and [DOC]. These findings indicate that combinations of biotic and abiotic factors could mediate or exacerbate the effects of future environmental change on peatland C cycling. Given this, studies of C cycling need to capture the spatial and temporal variance of biotic and abiotic factors and their interactions to project the likely impacts of environmental change.