Sara Bergante

Dr. Sara Bergante

Council for Agricultural Research and Agricultural Economy Analysis (CREA), Research Centre for Forestry and Wood (FL), 15033 Casale Monferrato, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2015 in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SDS. Njakou Djomo
S. Njakou Djomo
AAAlexander Ac
Alexander Ac
TZT. Zenone
T. Zenone
TGT. De Groote
T. De Groote
SBSara Bergante
Sara Bergante
RCR. Ceulemans
R. Ceulemans
One of the strategies to ensure energy security and to mitigate climate change in the European Union (EU) is the establishment and the use of short rotation woody crops (SRWCs) for the production of renewable energy. SRWCs are cultivated in the EU under different management systems. Addressing the energy security problems through SRWCs requires management systems that maximize the net energy yield per unit land area. We assembled and evaluated on-farm data from within the EU, (i) to understand the relationship between the SRWC yields and spatial distribution of precipitation, as well as the relationship between SRWC yield and the planting density, and (ii) to investigate whether extensively managed SRWC systems are more energy efficient than their intensively managed counterparts. We found that SRWC yield ranged from 1.3 to 24tha−1y−1 (mean 9.3±4.2tha−1y−1) across sites. We looked for, but did not find a relationship between yield and annual precipitation as well as between yield and planting density. The energy inputs of extensively managed SRWC systems ranged from 3 to 8GJha−1y−1 whereas the energy ratio (i.e. energy output to energy input ratio) varied from 9 to 29. Although energy inputs (3–16GJha−1y−1) were larger in most cases than those of extensively managed SRWC systems, intensively managed SRWC systems in the EU had higher energy ratios, i.e. between 15 and 62. The low energy ratio of extensively managed SRWC systems reflected their lower biomass yield per unit area. Switching from intensively managed SRWC systems to extensively managed ones thus creates an energy gap, and will require more arable land to be brought into production to compensate for the yield loss. Consequently, extensification is not the most appropriate path to the success of the wide scale deployment of SRWC for bioenergy production in the EU

29 February 2016 in GCB Bioenergy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Stefano AmaducciStefano Amaducci
Stefano Amaducci
GFGianni Facciotto
Gianni Facciotto
SBSara Bergante
Sara Bergante
Alessia PeregoAlessia Perego
Alessia Perego
PSPaolo Serra
Paolo Serra
CCCarlo Chimento
Carlo Chimento
A wealth of data and information on the cultivation of perennial biomass crops has been collected, but direct comparisons between herbaceous and woody crops are rare. The main objective of this research was to compare the biomass yield, the energy balance and the biomass quality of six perennial bioenergy crops: Populus spp., Robinia pseudoacacia, Salix spp., Arundo donax, Miscanthus × giganteus, and Panicum virgatum, grown in two marginal environments. For giant reed and switchgrass, two levels of nitrogen fertilization were applied annually (0–100 kg ha−1). Nitrogen fertilization did not affect biomass or energy production of giant reed; thus, it significantly reduced the energy return on investment (EROI) (from 73 to 27). In switchgrass, nitrogen fertilization significantly increased biomass production and the capacity of this crop to respond to water availability, making it a favorable option when only biomass production is a target. Net energy gain (NEG) was higher for herbaceous crops than for woody crops. In Casale,EROIcalculated for poplar and willow (7, on average) was significantly lower than that of the other crops (14, on average). In Gariga, the highestEROIwas calculated for miscanthus (98), followed by nonfertilized giant reed and switchgrass (82 and 73, respectively). Growing degree days10during the cropping season had no effect on biomass production in any of the studied species, although water availability from May to August was a major factor affecting biomass yield in herbaceous crops. Overall, herbaceous crops had the highest ranking for bioenergy production due to their high biomass yield, high net energy gain (NEG), and biomass quality that renders them suitable to both biochemical and thermochemical conversion. Miscanthus in particular had the highestEROIin both locations (16 and 98, in Casale and Gariga), while giant reed had the highestNEGon the silty‐loam soil of Gariga.

15 February 2023 in Life
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LRLaura Rosso
Laura Rosso
simone cantamessasimone cantamessa
simone cantamessa
SBSara Bergante
Sara Bergante
CBChiara Biselli
Chiara Biselli
AFAgostino Fricano
Agostino Fricano
ACAndrea Carra
Andrea Carra
Poplar (Populus spp.) is a high-value crop for wood and biomass production and a model organism for tree physiology and genomics. The early release, in 2006, of the complete genome sequence of P. trichocarpa was followed by a wealth of studies that significantly enriched our knowledge of complex pathways inherent to woody plants, such as lignin biosynthesis and secondary cell wall deposition. Recently, in the attempt to cope with the challenges posed by ongoing climate change, fundamental studies and breeding programs with poplar have gradually shifted their focus to address the responses to abiotic stresses, particularly drought. Taking advantage from a set of modern genomic and phenotyping tools, these studies are now shedding light on important processes, including embolism formation (the entry and expansion of air bubbles in the xylem) and repair, the impact of drought stress on biomass yield and quality, and the long-term effects of drought events. In this review, we summarize the status of the research on the molecular bases of the responses to drought in poplar. We highlight how this knowledge can be exploited to select more tolerant genotypes and how it can be translated to other tree species to improve our understanding of forest dynamics under rapidly changing environmental conditions.

1 January 2014 in Biomass and Bioenergy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MMMarco Manzone
Marco Manzone
SBSara Bergante
Sara Bergante
GFGianni FACCIOTTO
Gianni FACCIOTTO

1 February 2013 in Applied Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LRLaura Rosso
Laura Rosso
GFGianni FACCIOTTO
Gianni FACCIOTTO
SBSara Bergante
Sara Bergante
LVLorenzo Vietto
Lorenzo Vietto
GNGiuseppe Nervo
Giuseppe Nervo