Vladimir I. Timofeev

Dr. Vladimir I. Timofeev

Shubnikov Institute of Crystallography of Federal Scientific Research Centre “Crystallography and Photonics” of Russian Academy of Sciences, 59, Leninsky pr., Moscow, 119333, Russian Federation
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 February 2010 in Acta Crystallographica Section F Structural Biology and Crystallization Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Vladimir I. TimofeevVladimir I. Timofeev
Vladimir I. Timofeev
RCR. N. Chuprov-Netochin
R. N. Chuprov-Netochin
VSV. R. Samigina
V. R. Samigina
VBV. V. Bezuglov
V. V. Bezuglov
KMKonstantin Miroshnikov
Konstantin Miroshnikov
IKI. P. Kuranova
I. P. Kuranova

4 March 2016 in Crystal Growth & Design
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MKMikhail V. Kovalchuk
Mikhail V. Kovalchuk
ABAlexander E. Blagov
Alexander E. Blagov
YDYulia A. Dyakova
Yulia A. Dyakova
AGAndrey Yu. Gruzinov
Andrey Yu. Gruzinov
Margarita A. MarchenkovaMargarita A. Marchenkova
Margarita A. Marchenkova
VVVladimir V. Volkov
Vladimir V. Volkov

13 November 2017 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DKDmitrii Kamashev
Dmitrii Kamashev
YAYulia Agapova
Yulia Agapova
SRSergey Rastorguev
Sergey Rastorguev
ATAnna A. Talyzina
Anna A. Talyzina
KBKonstantin M. Boyko
Konstantin M. Boyko
TRTatiana V. Rakitina
Tatiana V. Rakitina
The structure and function of bacterial nucleoid are controlled by histone-like proteins of HU/IHF family, omnipresent in bacteria and also founding archaea and some eukaryotes.HU protein binds dsDNA without sequence specificity and avidly binds DNA structures with propensity to be inclined such as forks, three/four-way junctions, nicks, overhangs and DNA bulges. Sequence comparison of thousands of known histone-like proteins from diverse bacteria phyla reveals relation between HU/IHF sequence, DNA–binding properties and other protein features. Performed alignment and clusterization of the protein sequences show that HU/IHF family proteins can be unambiguously divided into three groups, HU proteins, IHF_A and IHF_B proteins. HU proteins, IHF_A and IHF_B proteins are further partitioned into several clades for IHF and HU; such a subdivision is in good agreement with bacterial taxonomy. We also analyzed a hundred of 3D fold comparative models built for HU sequences from all revealed HU clades. It appears that HU fold remains similar in spite of the HU sequence variations. We studied DNA–binding properties of HU from N. gonorrhoeae, which sequence is similar to one of E.coli HU, and HU from M. gallisepticum and S. melliferum which sequences are distant from E.coli protein. We found that in respect to dsDNA binding, only S. melliferum HU essentially differs from E.coli HU. In respect to binding of distorted DNA structures, S. melliferum HU and E.coli HU have similar properties but essentially different from M. gallisepticum HU and N. gonorrhea HU. We found that in respect to dsDNA binding, only S. melliferum HU binds DNA in non-cooperative manner and both mycoplasma HU bend dsDNA stronger than E.coli and N. gonorrhoeae. In respect to binding to distorted DNA structures, each HU protein has its individual profile of affinities to various DNA-structures with the increased specificity to DNA junction. HU/IHF family proteins sequence alignment and classification are updated. Comparative modeling demonstrates that HU protein 3D folding’s even more conservative than HU sequence. For the first time, DNA binding characteristics of HU from N. gonorrhoeae, M. gallisepticum and S. melliferum are studied. Here we provide detailed analysis of the similarity and variability of DNA-recognizing and bending of four HU proteins from closely and distantly related HU clades.

18 September 2011 in Crystallography Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
IKI. P. Kuranova
I. P. Kuranova
ESE. A. Smirnova
E. A. Smirnova
YAYu. A. Abramchik
Yu. A. Abramchik
LCL. A. Chupova
L. A. Chupova
Roman EsipovRoman Esipov
Roman Esipov
MKM. V. Kovalchuk
M. V. Kovalchuk
Crystals of phosphopantetheine adenylyltransferase from Mycobacterium tuberculosis, thymidine phosphorylase from Escherichia coli, carboxypeptidase T from Thermoactinomyces vulgarisand its mutant...

24 January 2016 in Crystallography Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Margarita A. MarchenkovaMargarita A. Marchenkova
Margarita A. Marchenkova
VVV. V. Volkov
V. V. Volkov
ABA. E. Blagov
A. E. Blagov
YDYu. A. Dyakova
Yu. A. Dyakova
KIK. B. Ilina
K. B. Ilina
MKM. V. Kovalchuk
M. V. Kovalchuk

1 January 2023 in Crystals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Vladimir I. TimofeevVladimir I. Timofeev
Vladimir I. Timofeev
VSValeriya R Samygina
Valeriya R Samygina
Proteins are the most important biological macromolecules, and are involved in almost all aspects of life. Therefore, the study of the structure of proteins is of great practical and fundamental importance. On the one hand, knowledge of the spatial structure is necessary to study the basic principles of protein functioning; for example, the mechanisms of enzymatic reactions. On the other hand, knowledge of the spatial structure of proteins is used, for example, in biotechnology, for the design of enzymes with desired properties, as well as in drug design. Today, the main method for determining the spatial structure of a protein is X-ray structural analysis of protein crystals. The main difficulty in applying this method is in obtaining a perfect protein-crystal. This review is devoted to the successes and challenges of modern protein crystallography.